The people who wanted to make scientific language 'inclusive' by erasing words such as 'mother' and 'woman' and so on also stated this:
Much of Western science is rooted in colonialism, white supremacy, and patriarchy, and these power structures continue to permeate our scientific culture
And no doubt that is true, but then the important question is to ask what non-Western science is rooted in. Certainly patriarchy, and more so, probably, than Western science. And probably some kind of race-based supremacy, privileging the race of those who wrote it.
Not critically examining alternatives is so common among the far left that you stop noticing it.
Critically examining all alternatives is not excusing the problems having to do with ideologies common in the West, but being realistic about the fact that other parts of the world also have problems, and when it comes to women's status those problems are more severe than in the West.