Jeffrey Marsh

Indeed- Like underage children “KIDS”.
🤢
Children need protection from early sexualisation.

Apologists for that creepy “Kids” person Jeffrey Marsh are on here-
Marsh creeps the heck out of women with his sibilant voice laden with innuendo.

Why does Marsh constantly address “ Kids”
An adult male of any persuasion would be viewed with major suspicion if he made grinning “KIDSSSSSSSSSSSssssssss” videos.

Should stick to people of his own age to 🎯.

But kids are innocent and malleable ~and very vulnerable.

A demented grinning middle aged adult of either sex should not be encouraging kids to message them.

to point out suggesting people may "need their devices checking" based on their sexual preferences

Some sexual preferences are illegal.

Rent free, mate, rent free.

"‘PP’ in a forum context generally means ‘previous poster’ or ‘previous posters’."

Apologies, I thought Posie parker was referred to as she is mentioned often.

As far as I know, JM has not deleted anything as he is not doing anything illegal.

Also to point out suggesting people may "need their devices checking" based on their sexual preferences, gender identity or views etc can be seen as malicious communication by police. See case by Christopher Mitchell who stalked and harassed a drag queen.

https://www.thepinknews.com/2023/04/18/anti-drag-christopher-mitchell-auntie-titania-trust-hate-crime/

https://www.edp24.co.uk/news/23451533.protester-christopher-mitchell-court-drag-queen-slurs/

You mean the video by Shumirun Neesa on Tiktok which has been removed because, according to her own account in another video, the police told her to remove it?

I've done a little researching and I presume you are all aware that-

-JM's videos in question are behind a patreon paywall. Therefore they can't be accessed by children as a card payment is needed. SN has not mentioned this.

-The videos are designed to be watched by the parents first. And then, if the parent chooses to, be watched together by the parent and their children. SN has not mentioned this.

-In the videos JM says "hey parents and kids". However SN has edited out the "parents" to make a compilation of him saying "hey kids".

-JM has received threats of violence (which I can confirm as I've seen them for myself) and been accused of "grooming" and being called names such as "p*do" countless times since the tiktok video was released?

As the saying goes, every story has 2 sides.

‘Have’ not ‘has’ - the post you replied to was clearly talking about ‘previous posters’ plural, not Posie Parker (singular).

I suspect they/them (singular) has rotted your brain 😆

Anyway, back on topic, what’s JEFFREY MARSH been up to lately?

Has he DFE?

(That’s ‘Deleted Fucking Everything’ btw)

‘PP’ in a forum context generally means ‘previous poster’ or ‘previous posters’.

Posie really must be living rent free in your head if you think we’re talking about her on every single thread that uses the ‘PP’ abbreviation 😂😂😂

You keep misgendering, kjk is a man according to kjks driving licence.
I guess kjk sometimes is a woman and she her pronouns are used and sometimes a man so he him is required.i think you should either contact kjk to find out which pronouns to use when or say kjk like the rest of us.

(FWIW, I don't agree that rapists or sex offenders should be subject to violent punishment. But it's quite a commonly expressed opinion that they should be.

If you want to take issue with people's expressed opinions on rapists, paedophiles and sex offenders, I suggest that it's not Mumsnet users who are generally suggesting this type of punishment.

And as for this rapist being a transwoman - for me, when it comes to crimes, I don't think someone's 'gender identity' should have any bearing on how they are treated. I think criminals should be judged according to their crime, not their gender identity.)

Who was this 'perpetrator'? Was she being Untoward About Rapists?

Obviously, I don’t actually think the punishment for rape should be having your penis nailed to a flaming tree stump, but hey, I bet we’d have a few less rapes.

From reading that thread, kjk wasn’t making the comment about a trans woman being nailed to a tree, but a trans rapist’s penis. I suppose that still is a transwoman being nailed to a tree, but I’m suddenly a bit more sympathetic to the kjk position.

Lostmarbles, you’ve seen the vids of JM encouraging children to leave their parents and contact him, right? And you don’t find that disturbing??

The same PP, Kelly Jay Keen, who said she likes the she "likes the imagery" of a trans woman being nailed to a tree and set on fire?

Video here:
https://twitter.com/shaun_vids/status/1649146986598133847

Remind me again what JM's alleged crime was?

Marsh and Mulvaney.
Two extremely disturbing males on social media.

The way that Marsh stares into the camera with cold eyes and that maniac's grin is beyond disturbing.

As PP have said, his hard drive needs a look.

Or The Red Room talking backwards.

Having watched a clip of him, he would fit right in with Mystery Man in Lost Highway, or Ben singing In Dreams to Frank Booth in Blue Velvet.

Thankyou go updates on this, I'd missed all this due to heavy work load.

Utterly horrific what's happened to this poor woman.

His stuffing video was hideous

This is an incredibly frightening man. Every instinct of a lifetime's experience tells me there's something very dangerous going on in him.

And using the logic that some posters have used to victim blame Shumriun (on the other thread), surely Marsh should not be posting anything that might stir up dissent with anyone. Even the fucked up supposed jokes about taxidermists whether that was intended to be sick joke/threat/ goady/ or whatever.

I mean, there was a poster who was very clear that Shumirun should never be posting anything that could incite threats and violence against her.

This episode has really brought out the fuckwittery behind the thinking of some people who cannot see beyond creating a situation where a group of people are seemingly blameless for their violence, the abuse they dish out and the blatant inappropriate and harmful behaviour. And that somehow pointing this out is hate.

Thanks ohholy

Shall we wait and see if posters come on and use the same fucked up logic about Al Jazeera using a similar format being ‘transphobic’ or that Al Jazeera deserves threats to them and their staff because of their video?

The fuckwittery we have seen on this thread has been a good live demonstration of silencing tactics used by extremists though. I guess we should expect the same commentary about Al Jazeera. They even added music!!!