Do drift over and leave a comment for Maggie Chapman

scratchedbymycat · 2023-02-11T00:28:02+00:00

Link to tweet. Comments are just perfect. How could she not anticipate exactly this reaction? https://twitter.com/maggiechapman/status/1624007949738815490?s=46&t=erNCY3F-lBZJgpNWHyvCRQ

ArabellaScott · 12/02/2023 15:56

I guess so. These zones are supported by women who are servicing the desires of men and upholding the status of women as sex objects. Just other women who should stay away.

Kucinghitam · 12/02/2023 14:38

Fab to see the Greens are supporting an industry that creates no-go zones for women, though, eh?

Only the wrong kind of women, because all Righteous Folx magically know (despite being unable to identify the sex of members of our own species) which are the Actual People whose desires are paramount, and which are the partially-sentient service bipeds whose purpose of existence is to please the Actual People.

ArabellaScott · 12/02/2023 14:32

I think most women/girls do, Waitwhat. Fab to see the Greens are supporting an industry that creates no-go zones for women, though, eh?

Waitwhat23 · 11/02/2023 19:54

ArabellaScott · 11/02/2023 19:28

This is unfair. Maggie has not ONLY posted about women in science. She's also retweeted a tweet celebrating the re-licensing of strip bars in Edinburgh - so she's in favour of maintaining the grotty sleaze of the Pubic Triangle as a no-go area for local women and girls, too!

twitter.com/susan4leithwalk/status/1624052762387308548?cxt=HHwWiICz6b_Y5YktAAAA

The Pubic Triangle is absolutely grim - I usually skirt around it.

LexMitior · 11/02/2023 19:39

Sturgeoning

ArabellaScott · 11/02/2023 19:28

This is unfair. Maggie has not ONLY posted about women in science. She's also retweeted a tweet celebrating the re-licensing of strip bars in Edinburgh - so she's in favour of maintaining the grotty sleaze of the Pubic Triangle as a no-go area for local women and girls, too!

twitter.com/susan4leithwalk/status/1624052762387308548?cxt=HHwWiICz6b_Y5YktAAAA

SDTGisAnEvilWolefGenius · 11/02/2023 18:08

I have left a comment or two.

ArabellaScott · 11/02/2023 18:04

Chersfrozenface · 11/02/2023 13:33

Moggie Personperson has no idea what a woman is. Or what science is.

😂

nepeta · 11/02/2023 17:52

This drift into the view that anyone can decide what facts are and that nobody needs to research their own beliefs because that is some kind of bigotry seems to be part of what someone called the onset of the Age of Endarkenment, derived from the Age of Enlightenment.

nepeta · 11/02/2023 17:51

I watched one video of her opinions. She gets biological science completely and totally and utterly wrong, which is not surprising in itself, as many people seem to be in the same boat, but she is completely convinced that it is she who is getting it right and the rest of the world is mistaken. And that is shocking in someone with the powers she has in politics.

dapsnotplimsolls · 11/02/2023 16:34

twitter.com/TerfyMcTerfy/status/1624190018167181316

Chersfrozenface · 11/02/2023 16:30

I like Moggie as her first name.

Since she doesn't know whether she's a woman, she might very well be a domestic feline.

And yes, Personperson is suitably gender neutral

ResisterRex · 11/02/2023 16:25

WarriorNun · 11/02/2023 16:23

Magpie Personperson.

Stealing women's rights.

This is excellent

WarriorNun · 11/02/2023 16:23

Magpie Personperson.

Stealing women's rights.

flyingbuttress43 · 11/02/2023 16:16

Ironically, Maggie Chapperson took a dig at her namesake Maggie Thatcher (Roberts) who was one of the earliest politicians to warn about acid rain, climate pollution and climate change way back in the 1980s while Maggie Chapperson was still in nappies.

Redshoeblueshoe · 11/02/2023 13:59

Stella Creasy has also made an idiot of herself, complaining about the non binary Brit Awards, which doesn't include any women.

Chersfrozenface · 11/02/2023 13:33

Moggie Personperson has no idea what a woman is. Or what science is.

Original poster

scratchedbymycat · 11/02/2023 11:38

Aaah. Thank you! (... oh dear Maggie).

OP posts:

Wiccan · 11/02/2023 11:10

Maggie Chapman you HYPOCRITE !
My back is well and truly up .

CrossPurposes · 11/02/2023 11:04

CrossPurposes · 11/02/2023 11:01

This is one way of looking at those figures.
There are 11,900 views of the tweet and 155 people have liked it. The ratio of likes to views is 155:11,900 which could be taken to mean that out of every 1000 people seeing the tweet only 13 people liked it.

Since I wrote that out the ratio has gone down to approximately 5 people in every 1000 views.

CrossPurposes · 11/02/2023 11:01

This is one way of looking at those figures.
There are 11,900 views of the tweet and 155 people have liked it. The ratio of likes to views is 155:11,900 which could be taken to mean that out of every 1000 people seeing the tweet only 13 people liked it.

WarriorN · 11/02/2023 10:52

scratchedbymycat · 11/02/2023 10:45

Can someone explain Twitter ratio to me, and how you see it? I'm on the mobile app and think I might be missing something.

That's the ratio!

Boiledbeetle · 11/02/2023 10:50

This is now if someone would like to translate the numbers at the bottom for those of us who still don't understand how Twitter works. As I haven't a clue.

Do drift over and leave a comment for Maggie Chapman

WarriorN · 11/02/2023 10:48

One example is that 155 likes for Maggie; 766 for bindel. Many people responding on thread have way over Maggie's like number.

Another way is if there's more quote tweets than likes, people are quoting her negatively.

Original poster

scratchedbymycat · 11/02/2023 10:46

I revisited her tweet and scrolled and scrolled and scrolled. I can't find a single comment supporting her. Not one.

OP posts: