Helloprint has suddenly refused to supply stickers to Kellie-Jay Keen

You can teach someone but you can't learn for them.

I give up. I simply can't spell it out any clearer. I tried but it just isn't possible.

People say that about trans women, though and have seen it on here.. So where exactly does it refer to "being obviously about AGP?"
It doesn't.

You’re men who get sexual kicks from being treated like women.

'Autogynephilia is defined as a male's propensity to be sexually aroused by the thought of himself as a female.'(National Library of Medicine)

.....

Quite obviously she is referring to AGP there
It's made obvious where exactly in that you've just quoted?

Here's the full quote I assume you are referring to -

“You are fucking blackface actors. You aren’t women. You’re men who get sexual kicks from being treated like women. fuck you and your dirty fucking perversions. our oppression isn’t a fetish you pathetic, sick, fuck.”

Quite obviously she is referring to AGP there. Which is a paraphillia. And women don't particularly like their oppression used as a sexual fetish. Some examples of how those who have AGP view women - “an open mouth, an expectant asshole, blank, blank eyes” (Andrea Long Chu) or “sometimes I wonder if dressing up like this is the equivalent of having sex with myself' (Caitlyn Jenner).

(As that term used to be banned here, I have to see how long this stays up). TRA's don't like it when it is pointed out that for at least some (certainly not all) it is a sexual fetish.

I addressed the black face issue in my previous post. Perhaps you missed it?

People who openly celebrate the death of a young woman are sick fucks so I can't say I disagree with her there
People who do that are sick fucks, I completely agree
That's not what she said were sick fucks though - not sure if you're aware, or if you're twisting?
She said people who are trans are sick fucks and black face actors
Do you agree there with her?

For any lurkers, here's Magdalen's YouTube channel - https://youtube.com/@MagdalenBerns

Yes. That was the cyclepath.

People who openly celebrate the death of a young woman are sick fucks so I can't say I disagree with her there.

I'm not a fan of the whole blackface/womanface equivalency but I can certainly understand the objections behind the concept of using the concept of women as a costume (I.e. nothing more than stereotypes of appearance and behaviours). Dylan 'I've been a girl for 100 days!!' Mulvaney being a perfect example of what women are objecting to.

Not sure what specific incident you're referring to, is it the one where some gender criticals tried to hijack a pride march and march at the front (they hadn't registered, which was required) but weren't permitted to do so by other marchers and (after causing an obstruction and disturbance) were asked by police to leave?

That's nothing at all to do with their beliefs, that's because they didn't follow the rules (which everyone else had to follow) and were causing trouble.

It's happened a few times, gender criticals trying to make out they were victimised "because of their beliefs" then it turns out there's a valid explanation.

Are they great people in your eyes?
No, people saying or doing that aren't great people in my eyes.
Where do you get from my post that I thought they would be?
I think that's a disgusting thing to do.
Why the whataboutery, anyway?
Do you think calling people who are trans black face actors and sick fucks are great people?
Seeing as you're asking me if I think dancing on people's graves is a nice thing to do or saying that you quoted (no, I don't, as I said and have never implied otherwise)

Out of curiosity is there anyone who passes your purity test?

When Magdalen died tragically early from a brain tumour, TRA's made horrific posts about dancing on her grave. 'Veronica Ivy' (formerly Rachel McKinnon, formally a man's name) said, of those people who were celebrating Magdalen's impending death, such celebrations are "ethically justified when the person dying has engaged in extreme harassment of a marginalised group'.

Are they great people in your eyes?

Magdalen fought against many things well before others were aware of them - she criticised the hideous concept of the cotton ceiling, she spoke against deplatforming and for single sex spaces for girls in Schools, among many other things. If any lurkers haven't heard or her, look her up. She's great.

As she said herself - 'I'd rather be rude than a fucking liar'.

I utterly reject them too.

The one who called people who are trans blackface actors and sick fucks?
Late great obviously a matter of opinion as doesn't sound great to me.

So Mermaids can be excluded then according to your logic?

Let's not forget that the late, great Magdalen Berns was thrown out of the Lesbian Society at Edinburgh University for stating that men cannot be lesbians.

Wasn’t it lesbians who got thrown out of Pride marches for refusing to accept that males can be lesbians? So males with a trans identity were not content with co opting the word woman, but demanded to be recognised as female homosexuals. I’d like all these gender ideologists to explainhow it is that insisting female homosexuals should be fine with dating males is not conversion therapy and deeply homophobic. What is the difference between a male with a trans identity claiming he is a lesbian, and the blokes down the pub stating they are ‘lesbians in a man’s body’?

It's hardly an 'inclusive' event for LGBT people, where LGB people are only welcome if fully compliant to straight sex with a TQ+ person.

They can I suppose be homosexual but only if they never talk about it and act TQ+ compliant in public. Effectively back in the closet. Because their homosexuality is a threat to people who do not wish others to perceive the reality of their sex, or be allowed to date exclusively on a sex based orientation. In peace.

Let it all sink in. You can have any kink at all, even MAPS now welcome, but homosexuality?

How does it go in the interviews and articles, let's see if I remember...'Learn to cope' with straight sex. Don't selfishly prioritise your own orgasms when there are TQ+ people who urgently need your service provision. Break the cotton ceiling. Down with conversion therapy (except for homosexuals.) Inclusive events! (But not for them.) Be kind! (But not to them.) And the homosexuals better not resist any of this or the TQ+ lobby will throw them out of gay Pride.

So @RedAndBlueStripedGolfingUmbrella should all the people carrying trans tights now been ejected also? They were excluding LGB people weren’t they? Are you saying no one can be at a pride unless they tow the party line? Why?

As you can see from the posts here: 'LGBT event' now means nothing more than 'people compliant to the T ideology'
That's not what I meant or said at all though - just that it's a no brainer someone wasn't welcome there when they wear attire excluding some the event is for.
You're entitled to want to exclude the L, G, the B or the T but it's a bit daft to think that at an inclusive event for all of those everyone would be accepting of you blatantly pushing one out, seems a bit doing it to try and be antogonising.
Wear it at LGB events, not LGBT ones - unless you're deliberately seeking drama/publicity

@Rendell " or TRAs want to 'decapitate TERFs' now. "

I wish i had your confidence in that because tbqh, they seem to be a very unhinged/dangerous group, that i wouldn't trust as far as i could throw them!
Death threats, rape threats, actual assaults don't come from sane, rational people!