Mark Hamill is a “transphobe” for liking JK’s tweet

Which case is this again? Link?

Evidence shows transpeople are more likely to be victims of crime than commit it, and trans hate crime is increasing.

www.gov.scot/publications/updated-study-characteristics-police-recorded-hate-crime-scotland/

Not only is "whatabouttery" boring, it is also a logical fallacy.

Oh and he's in a women's prison. Of course. Because fuck female prisoners, right?

Of course you haven't been following the case. Why would you? It's only the very real, direct and actual consequences of the ideology you spend your life promoting on here.

Has this post been reported for its appalling transphobia?

Who the hell do you think you are to declare that someone who says they are trans isn't, in fact, trans?

What gives you that right?

Predatory chancers who may potentially commit a serious crime like rape aren't going to follow whatever the rules are for transpeople are they? They aren't going to go through all the time and effort to live as a woman or obey any rules that say they can't access a certain area, if they're a rapist they will do what they want
What "time and effort", exactly?

No he's correct. And brave.

Christ alive! Predatory trans people aren't actually trans, they're just chancers..
Wtf? And very transphobic actually, how presumptuous of you to suggest someone who declares themselves trans are actually only pretending!
Isn't Self-ID one of your goals @MargaritaPie ??
Have you any notion of what it actually means?

*less

The predatory chancers aren't trans, they're just predatory chancers

so being trans is mutually exclusive with being a predator?

Obviously most trans people aren’t predators, but how do we know which are genuinely trans?

Isnt the evidence that trans women offend against women at a similar rate to males as a whole? Why do you think someone identifying as trans is some kind of protective factor such that they are Les than a risk than any other anatomically male person?

-The predatory chancers aren't trans, they're just predatory chancers as you say.

-Permitting transpeople to live life as the sex they identify as including which facilities they use has not been proven to put women in danger here or abroad (including countries where transpeople don't face the extreme scrutiny as they do here). It isn't backed by evidence.

-Predatory chancers who may potentially commit a serious crime like rape aren't going to follow whatever the rules are for transpeople are they? They aren't going to go through all the time and effort to live as a woman or obey any rules that say they can't access a certain area, if they're a rapist they will do what they want.

The difference is Nick Griffin is saying that immigrants are bad. No one is saying trans people are bad, far from it. Simply that trans women remain physically male and that sometimes that affects their access to womens spaces. Being an immigrant is not relevant to the crime committed. Being male is very relevant to the crime of forcing your penis inside of someone.

But it's not possible to lie about being trans, is it, Marg?

Do you not believe that if you say you are trans then you are? Or that if you say you are a woman, you are? (Don't panic... I know won't be able to answer!)

That’s what GC women have been saying - that predatory men/chancers will take advantage so natal women must be protected. We’re not equating trans with the predatory men, although presumably the usual proportion of males will be a danger to women, however they identify.

I haven't been following the case but if this is accurate then it may be possible this individual isn't trans at all but potentially just a chancer

Now extrapolate that to ALL the men who call themselves women - how any of them are sufferers of gender dysphoria and how many are just chancers? How can you tell?

And for prisons - sod the case by case excuse and Keep Prisons Single Sex. Problem solved!

You can choose literally any group of people and with enough time find news articles where they have apparently done something bad. It doesn't prove anything because it's a biased approach and cherry-picking.

"What with the rapist who suddenly decided he was a woman halfway through his rape trial,"

I haven't been following the case but if this is accurate then it may be possible this individual isn't trans at all but potentially just a chancer. This is why prisons decide on a case-by-case basis which prison transpeople should go to.

Always first in line with the whataboutery... Boring.

Talk about cherry picking?

Anyone remember Nick Griffin of the BNP? I recall his Twitter timeline full of articles where immigrants had committed a crime as if that somehow proved his point. (Which it didn't, because he was cherry picking to suit his agenda and ignoring the fact most immigrants were law abiding just like the locals).

Mark clearly is gender critical and has 'liked' this sort of gc tweet before and then backtracked. He needs to hold his ground, but there is so much pressure on these people to backtrack. He has a wife and adult daughters I think, and lives for a Hollywood star a normal life, kind of like a normal person. Of course he knows what a woman is. Mark do the decent thing - take a stand!

Wow, you've come back out of the woodwork quickly. What with the rapist who suddenly decided he was a woman halfway through his rape trial, and the charming sex pest calling for the decapitation of feminists, I thought you might be feeling a little contrite.

Stupid of me!

What's the point of posting at all, when he's too much of a fucking weasel to even clarify what he means? Gobshite.

I found his reply interesting, as it never actually commits to a position and doesn't "pick a side". He doesn't actually say he agrees with JKR or IW.
Plausible deniability either way.

twitter.com/MarkHamill/status/1618012349516115968