Miriam Cates abuse in HoC by Lloyd Russell-Moyle

See para 2 under Annexe C for commentary.
https://www.gov.scot/publications/gender-recognition-reform-scotland-bill-letter-to-msps/

It appears that it is a notification obligation on the SO rather than any automatic link up between law enforcement and the GRC process

I suspected that that would be the case Chaz. Do you have a source for that? (I'm not doubting you, it's just I couldn't find one.)

And the way the CC becomes aware is but the Sex Offender telling them they intend to apply. So all we have to do is rely on the Sex Offender to do the right thing.

Isn't it just great being female in 2023?

In the spirit of Tony the Tiger 🐅

It's just GRR(Scotland)reat!

Tis feeling more like women must have felt in 1923, 1823, and 1723 at the moment depending on which delight is popping its head up to stick the boot in.

Clearly a very dangerous man.

Women have been pointing this out for bloody years.

Who is going to stand on the doorway of a woman's space and demand to see a GRC or birth certificate?

No one. And the suggestion of gatekeeping causes raging because privacy of the male: it's not like any female matters, is it?.

And we're told that a male may be at any stage of transition, and may have made his decision two minutes before walking into the female space. And a male obviously does not have to present in any stereotypical way, because stereotypes only matter when they serve a TQ+ political purpose.

So in essence, if one male can enter under any circumstances at all, all males can, at any time, with any agenda, and by walking into that space have invoked the power and protection intended for the very small number of males with significant medical transition who passed the gate keeping of the original GRC, and expect to be accepted and unchallenged. And can threaten you with legal consequences if you dare to look sideways at them.

Isn't it just great being female in 2023?

Yep. Just as, if I get into my dog’s crate, I become a dog.

Also complained to the Labour Party. Not sure it will do much good but it's nice to feel I have actually done something.

Kavanagh works, or worked, directly for Lloyd. She is a caseworker or policy advisor.

Agree with this.

So any man dressed in what people might perceive as women's clothes (and this could change country to country), or in a women's only space, or because they said so, is a woman according to the not overly bright stabby finger mantrum person?

But of course.

Being in women-only space = living as a woman = transwoman.

This man is SO hypocritical.

"It's fine for women to have concerns. They just need to talk about it using the exact words and phrases I've pre-approved"

That article needs a thread of its own
One police force being held up as a great example because its charge rate has tripled from 3% to 10%

agreed

he proved that with his behaviour to MC

Twansphobia is a tewwible thing, Wussell.

nauticant · Today 08:19

Thanks for your clarification. I suppose that if the CC is fully Stonewalled, the scumbag will get his ticket.

Police believe rape myths

yes I mean what could possibly go wrong with that idea

I did read about this. Another abdication of responsibility and a way to direct the blame when it goes wrong ie a woman is raped.

They're relying on police information being complete, and on the police doing the right thing at all times. As we've seen recently etc etc

And also for people to reflect on the news that's come out this week about the Police and then consider how safe it feels for the Police to intervene to safeguard women when it will be a nuisance to do this and doing it properly will see the Police come under pressure from a number of directions.

www.standard.co.uk/news/london/refuge-apples-met-police-david-carrick-protest-b1054491.html

It's not my law!

But I'm keen for people to learn about this because if they're going to argue with genderists who are claiming that the Bill contains safeguards with respect to sex offenders, then it's good that people know what's actually in the Bill.

Offender!

A ‘bad’ sex offended rather than those good ones?

I thought that the Scottish Parliament had voted that amendment down?

It was replaced by an amendment that is claimed to have an equivalent effect, see Section 6B:

www.parliament.scot/-/media/files/legislation/bills/s6-bills/gender-recognition-reform-scotland-bill/stage-3/bill-as-passed.pdf

This requires a Chief Constable to become aware that a bad sex offender is seeking a GRC, for the CC to decide they're bad enough for the CC to intervene, and for the CC to liaise with the Registrar General to ensure that no GRC is issued.

In other words, a blanket ban has been binned in favour of deciding if a sex offender is bad enough and maybe then, or maybe not, intervening to prevent a GRC being issued.

I went to university with Paul Bristow. He was an absolute prick, the worst kind of human. Was awful to women and homeless people. Seeing him backing his female colleague by doing more than any party whip or leader has done has actually blown my mind. Do people really change?

I don't think LRM has the necessary emotional continence to occupy any position of responsibility.