“A teenager or adult who self identifies as autistic. Again, this in a way should be fine, except again and again this seems to be centering autism on a particular presentation of functioning people who have had no developmental delays in language or motor skills. If any parent dares to suggest that this is less severe this is met by fierce condemnation. It’s all OK as long as the terminology is right, but honestly no one seems to care about the kids who can’t speak who still aren’t getting services, no one fights or talks about them.”
I disagree with this part to an extent.
Autism isn’t just about language or motor skills delays, many autistic people, particularly women, spoke early, many of us have mild motor skills issues but not to the extent where they could be recognised - remember we’re still at a point where many teachers don’t believe a child could be autistic because they’re not Rain Man.
Autism assessment looks at social development, social interaction amongst others.
Whilst I agree that tiktok identity diagnoses are annoying, take up resources etc, there are many undiagnosed women out there who, until it was made mainstream, had no idea that a) women could be autistic, or b) their disabling traits could be anything other than laziness or uselessness (as we’re often brought up to think).
I didn’t realise I could be autistic until my son was assessed, I then realised that I was too - the self ID bit for women particularly is inevitable - however I could not call myself autistic or allow myself any slack or strategies to help until I was diagnosed. I can assure you though, despite no language delays it is disabling, and you do a disservice to many autistics to suggest otherwise.