NecessaryScene - "This particular society-wide Woke mess is a new acute problem hitting everyone - particularly women due to their chronic problem."
JB is so behind the curve on this that she is a liability with her "Calm down, dear, left wing feminists can sort this out!" attitude.
Going with JB's references to FGM, prostitution, etc. the equivalent situation would be:
. . . . schools across the country would be promoting FGM, prostitution, etc.
. . . . the NHS would be planning to increase funding for FGM surgery (well, they are but they don't call it FGM)
. . . . Girl Guiding would have a Lolita Badge for Brownies
. . . . every schoolgirl in the country would either have a pimp or know at least a couple of friends who had volunteered to be regularly gang-raped
. . . . almost every family would have a daughter, grand daughter, niece, cousin or a friend with a child who is convinced that she needs "life-saving FGM surgery" or that if she doesn't have a man selling her to be raped that she will kill herself.
Meanwhile, girls are STILL being trafficked for sex as they have been for the last 40 years and STILL nobody knows how many children are affected and how many perpetrators are involved.
www.iicsa.org.uk/reports-recommendations/publications/investigation
Parents have been organising to protect their children but they do not need to fear that they will be reported to the police for being "untoward about paedophiles".
paceuk.info/
FGM and the rape of children are not being promoted as good and natural things by everyone from the BBC to the CofE and parents are not being taught that a toddler pulling open the poppers on their onesie is signalling that they either want to be raped or be subjected to FGM.
Note:
"FGM" in the previous paragraph is not a synonym for "gender affirming care".
JB really does not seem to appreciate the scale and urgency and, despite her references to the BNP and Tommy Robinson muscling in on the "grooming gang" fiasco, gives pats on the back to her Soc Fem pals who prioritise polishing their left-wing credentials over protecting children.
In the screenshot from the Facebook "Actual Gender Critical Left" note the first comment:
"The replies are all trite cliches. Sometimes I think if I hear (read) "safeguarding" one more time I will vomit".
Note the "reactions": they are all "Likes" or "Laughs".
This is in response to comments on a WPUK Facebook post about Jayne Egerton's article ""Women and the Religious Right in the USA" (lauded by JB).
Note the comments that follow.
What is vastly more important to these women than "safeguarding", which either makes them want to vomit or is a joke, is approbation by other members of their in-crowd and fellow journalists and academics.
The Soc Fems in that screenshot are also mainly in the USA, where the situation is even more dire than here in the UK.
These women, in both the UK and the USA, spend their time researching and posting about Hearts of Oak, Tommy Robinson, the Proud Boys, etc. as well as the increasingly ugly and dangerous backlash by the USA religious right against anything and everything under the LGBT+ umbrella.
There is also post after damning post about women in the UK and USA who are taking court cases, organising public meetings and street protests, who are doing their utmost to engage with policy-makers and the public and raise awareness. Utterly evil - some of them have even appeared on the Tucker Carlson Show 😱
JB seems to have in her mind's eye a fantasy army of Left Wing Feminists bravely doing battle to save women and children from male violence, of which transgender ideology is just the latest pocket of horrors. She praises their armchair activism, which consists predominantly of slagging-off actual activists in blog posts and on social media.
The irony is that KJK obviously admires JB and has repeatedly invited her on to her YouTube Channel and to attend #LetWomenSpeak events.
JB seems to think that to do so would damn her as a "right wing bigot" - apparently not realising that she already has that reputation with some on "the Left", being seen as a sell-out patsy writing click-bait for the Daily Mail. However, on the Right she is seen as a raging Left-wing feminist, so her involvement might well serve to scare off - or educate - the right wing men apparently lurking in the shadows ready to appropriate Gender Critical activism.
By contrast, HJ seems well aware that this is much more than a feminist issue and that we should not hang around while it gets rapidly worse, leaving the field wide open for violent far-right opportunists to step in, ie. without any help or encouragement from the diverse ranks of dissenters who are Gender Critical women and Feminists.
The far right, mainly men, are already doing just that in the USA and, wouldn't you know it, the Soc Fems who sit on their arses penning hit-pieces are blaming other women.
Pull your finger out, Julie, stop being part of the problem and start being part of the solution.