Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Cambridge sermon: Jesus may have been trans

184 replies

flyingbuttress43 · 27/11/2022 12:25

www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/11/26/jesus-could-have-transgender-claims-cambridge-dean/

Jushua Heath, a junior research fellow, guest preacher at evensong at Trinity College chapel displayed Renaissance and Medieval paintings of the crucifixion, which depicted a side wound he likened to a vagina, and said Christ had a trans body.

Dr Michael Banner, dean of Trinity College said such a view was "legitimate" in a response to one anonymous worshipper who said the audience and choir were "visibly uncomfortable" and upset at the sermon. Dr Banner said the sermon "suggested that we might think about these images of Christ's male/female body as providing us with ways of thinking about issues around transgender questions today".

He added: "For myself, I think that speculation was legitimate, whether or not you or I or anyone else disagrees with the interpretation, says something else about that artistic tradition, or resists its application to contemporary questions around transsexualism."

I'm not even religious, but I seriously wonder if there is anywhere the trans movement won't go in support of their ideology.

OP posts:
PhotoDad · 27/11/2022 15:16

@PrinceYakimov Yeah. But I do think that subtext is there in the medieval and Renaissance art. (Sceptical initially but was won over when I read papers on the topic.)

As for the sermon... of course, Trinity Cambridge is a big famous college and attracts some tourists/families for evensong etc (although not as many as King's next door). But Oxbridge college evensong sermons can often be mini-lectures by one of the chapel community.

Anactor · 27/11/2022 15:14

LadyMarmaladeAtkins · 27/11/2022 14:48

I was thinking of going to a C of E church for some carols this Christmas. I think I'll pass.

Just avoid any church connected with academia?

MagpiePi · 27/11/2022 15:13

PrinceYakimov · 27/11/2022 14:54

Caveat that I haven't read the sermon and don't know how well it's been reported. But one reason this may be so offensive to feminist Christians is because one of the historic reasons for opposition to ordaining women was that a female body couldn't represent Christ at the Eucharist.

Women's vocations to the priesthood were denied for centuries because of this. It's so incredibly dismissive of our struggle, to say 'oh yeah! Christ was actually also simultaneously female all along because art! Cool!'

But if Jesus was a trans woman, then that was surely the right kind of woman, who can woman better than one of those boring old cunty types?

PrinceYakimov · 27/11/2022 15:11

Conceptualising penetration as the thing that makes you "feminine" is yuck too.

Above all, it's pastorally crap to deliver an art history lecture in place of a sermon. This doesn't appear to have told any of the congregation anything about the Gospel. It seems to be an exercise in showing off the preacher's post-modern cleverness.

Anactor · 27/11/2022 15:05

puffyisgood · 27/11/2022 13:06

probably, in fairness, more believable than turning water into wine.

I can't really get too upset about claims made regarding a space pixie's 'gender identity', provided of course that it's not somehow used as an excuse to pass TWAW-style lies as, er, gospel.

Since there's a fair amount of party tricks that involve turning water into wine, it's considerably less believable.

We're talking about an historical figure, not some imaginary 'space pixie'. However you may feel about Jesus' claims to being the Messiah (or his ability to solve catering problems), using his death to push a trans agenda is pretty rubbish.

DameMaud · 27/11/2022 15:03

soddingspiderseason · 27/11/2022 14:17

Wrong quote! Sigh. Meant to quote the 'fashionably edgy' one. Wrong glasses.

That one from eyes is good too tho!

PhotoDad · 27/11/2022 15:02

Oh, yes, @PrinceYakimov, well put.

A brief history of Christianity, by PhotoDad.

"We cannot do/say/believe X because of theology!"
[... time passes ...]
"We must do/say/believe X because of theology!"

Repeat.

LiesDoNotBecomeUs · 27/11/2022 15:02

He isn't telling his congregation anything about Christ or about trans issues... he is revealing how very little he knows about art and about the bodies of women. (The latter is not so unusual: I do remember a sermon including a bit about women hiding wrinkles with mascara.)

The vagina as a stab wound... that is a thoroughly external view of a woman's body!

DameMaud · 27/11/2022 15:01

IcakethereforeIam · 27/11/2022 14:04

Is there something in the water at Cambridge?

Although I don't think he went as far as saying TWATW wasn't a coe bod at a school reported, by the school, to Prevent for saying that it was okay to question gi orthodoxy, or along those lines. I think he's got an ET coming up.

Yes @IcakethereforeIam . Rev Bernard Randall at Trent College. Here's a just released interview with him on Gender a Wider Lens. It's just gone to court and expecting outcome in January:

MrsOvertonsWindow · 27/11/2022 14:58

PrinceYakimov · 27/11/2022 14:54

Caveat that I haven't read the sermon and don't know how well it's been reported. But one reason this may be so offensive to feminist Christians is because one of the historic reasons for opposition to ordaining women was that a female body couldn't represent Christ at the Eucharist.

Women's vocations to the priesthood were denied for centuries because of this. It's so incredibly dismissive of our struggle, to say 'oh yeah! Christ was actually also simultaneously female all along because art! Cool!'

Excellent point Prince. I also believe this "sermon" demonstrates a key aspect of the well established tradition called "having your cake and eating it".

PrinceYakimov · 27/11/2022 14:54

Caveat that I haven't read the sermon and don't know how well it's been reported. But one reason this may be so offensive to feminist Christians is because one of the historic reasons for opposition to ordaining women was that a female body couldn't represent Christ at the Eucharist.

Women's vocations to the priesthood were denied for centuries because of this. It's so incredibly dismissive of our struggle, to say 'oh yeah! Christ was actually also simultaneously female all along because art! Cool!'

Childcare101 · 27/11/2022 14:53

Jesus declared himself the Son of God by direct testimony. Not trans daughter or any other such rubbish. the SON.
In His arraignment before Caiaphas, He was asked, "Art thou the Christ (Messiah), the Son of the Blessed?" He answered, "I am." (Mark 14:61, 62.)

LadyMarmaladeAtkins · 27/11/2022 14:48

I was thinking of going to a C of E church for some carols this Christmas. I think I'll pass.

nilsmousehammer · 27/11/2022 14:47

WinterTrees · 27/11/2022 14:23

If Jesus was trans then God himself is guilty of some pretty hefty misgendering.

Quite. Within this ideology he is the bungler busy stuffing souls in the wrong bodies.

Which makes you wonder what the ideology's view of the afterlife is.

nilsmousehammer · 27/11/2022 14:45

says something else about that artistic tradition

Oh it says a whole lot of things.

'Batshit' is one of the politer ones.

Muddays · 27/11/2022 14:42

@EmmaGrundyForPM “I’m fairly certain that no man in gheir right mind would identify as female in Palestine in AD33“.
SO true and darkly funny Emma.

DeanVolecapeAKAelderberry · 27/11/2022 14:40

Julian of Norwich was writing about Jesus (and God the Father) as our Mother in the 14th century, but managed to keep it theological and spiritual rather than rabbiting on about gashes. It's the kind of nonsense that makes one wonder should men be priests.

PhotoDad · 27/11/2022 14:37

Blister · 27/11/2022 14:30

The body of Christ only ever represents all humanity when it is convenient theology. If not it definitely represents only men.

If not we wouldn't have had to fight so hard to have female priests in any of the Christian denominations.

Amen. Theologians and whole denominations are incredibly good at being inconsistent and holding the whole system together with "mystery of faith!"

Blister · 27/11/2022 14:30

The body of Christ only ever represents all humanity when it is convenient theology. If not it definitely represents only men.

If not we wouldn't have had to fight so hard to have female priests in any of the Christian denominations.

Childcare101 · 27/11/2022 14:25

Lord have mercy 🙄

WinterTrees · 27/11/2022 14:23

If Jesus was trans then God himself is guilty of some pretty hefty misgendering.

soddingspiderseason · 27/11/2022 14:17

Wrong quote! Sigh. Meant to quote the 'fashionably edgy' one. Wrong glasses.

soddingspiderseason · 27/11/2022 14:14

Theeyeballsinthesky · 27/11/2022 13:27

I wonder if a preacher has got up and said “you can’t change sex, TWATW not women” whether Dr Banner would be so quick to jump up & defend them

Snorted at this. Thank you for putting it so succinctly.

IcakethereforeIam · 27/11/2022 14:04

Is there something in the water at Cambridge?

Although I don't think he went as far as saying TWATW wasn't a coe bod at a school reported, by the school, to Prevent for saying that it was okay to question gi orthodoxy, or along those lines. I think he's got an ET coming up.

MrsDanversGlidesAgain · 27/11/2022 14:00

StopStartStop · 27/11/2022 13:55

Leaving aside the deepy iffy theology, since when was a vagina under the ribs?

It was a botched faux-vag op.

Aside - there's a church near me offering a 'Live Nativity'. I wonder how far they're going with that?

OT but the best nativity I ever saw was in Tunisia (where we'd gone to escape Christmas 😆) They had a real camel and a real donkey. No idea about the baby.