Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Starmer and his 99.9%

164 replies

bellinisurge · 31/10/2022 13:48

The Labour leader is desperately trying to stay on the fence with his 99.9% of women are biological women schtick.

He repeated it in the recent MN interview.

Let me be clear, as he is so fond of saying, 100% of women are biological women. And as long as you keep pandering to this alleged "0.1%", we will lose the language we need to describe us, and we will lose the right to single sex spaces. Women are a sex class. And any attempt to pretend otherwise will fall over at the first scrutiny. And you will lose the election because you have manufactured an existential crisis for women. Try harder.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
16
bellinisurge · 31/10/2022 16:04

He is the leader of the party. He wants to be political leader of the country. Who else should I blame.
Leaders before him have battled Clause 4. It's not impossible to rid the party of an inappropriate influence.

OP posts:
BitOutOfPractice · 31/10/2022 15:58

I did say that I don't think you should shut up! But I don't think laying all of this sorry mess at Kier Starmer's door is fair either. It's a massive problem across the whole of the centre left of politics.

I also think that the truth is that, for most voters of any stripe, the issue of gender ID will be a long long way down their list of priorities, especially in view of the incoming recession.

I am not saying whether that is right of wrong. But I think people will have what they consider to be more pressing issues to vote on.

bellinisurge · 31/10/2022 15:56

@AutumnsCrow , I've been in a bit.
Usually on here, the prepper boards (I'm a prepper) , Brexit boards because I'm still fucking pissed off about Brexit and occasionally Craicnet and Litter Tray.

OP posts:
TheClogLady · 31/10/2022 15:55

bellinisurge · 31/10/2022 15:49

I will not keep quiet about this @BitOutOfPractice . It is up to the Labour Party to sort itself out on this. It is not my job to keep quiet.
To win the next election with our current voting system, Labour needs to win comprehensively in places it has lost. At the moment, it has a big lead in the polls.
But once it becomes clear that its Self ID policy means your granny won't be guaranteed intimate care from a biological woman when she's in hospital, that is going to turn people off.
Nothing in what Starmer has said reassures me.

All of this ^

And I was once an elected officer for Momentum in the NW 🙈

bellinisurge · 31/10/2022 15:53

I will not vote Labour and hope for the best. This is the only thing stopping me and many others from supporting Labour. And it is an existential matter to paraphrase Glinner.

OP posts:
AutumnsCrow · 31/10/2022 15:52

bellinisurge · 31/10/2022 15:25

@BitOutOfPractice , yes, daring to question the direction taken by the party I have voted for all my life makes me a Torybot. When you are eventually old enough to vote, you can pick who you like.

I recognise both your use names as having been on Mumsnet for a long time, on many threads on many boards. Is that right?

bellinisurge · 31/10/2022 15:49

I will not keep quiet about this @BitOutOfPractice . It is up to the Labour Party to sort itself out on this. It is not my job to keep quiet.
To win the next election with our current voting system, Labour needs to win comprehensively in places it has lost. At the moment, it has a big lead in the polls.
But once it becomes clear that its Self ID policy means your granny won't be guaranteed intimate care from a biological woman when she's in hospital, that is going to turn people off.
Nothing in what Starmer has said reassures me.

OP posts:
nilsmousehammer · 31/10/2022 15:47

The arrogance of those currently running the left parties is a feature not a bug.

There's a huge amount of head patting superiority and a lot of belief in having minority special pets such as acting all passionate about the current causes of the hour, all the right noises made - ethnic women, working class, LGBT+, the homeless, yada yada, but if one of those special pets gets out of their box by trying to speak for themselves, or mentioning an opinion on themselves and their minority that goes off message, they get extremely pissed off extremely fast.

Special pets should be grateful and quiet and submissive, and they will get what they're given and like it.

Hence why Starmer is so very pissed off with MN. We're supposed to be naice and just ask about biscuits so he can talk about how wonderfully supportive he is of mothers of young children.

RoyalCorgi · 31/10/2022 15:46

BitOutOfPractice · 31/10/2022 15:20

I am starting to think that these threads are being started by Tory HQ bots.

Because anyone who thinks the Conservative party is a friend of women is deluded.

Has anybody on this thread said the Conservative Party is a friend to women?

Trust me, there is nothing I want more than for Keir Starmer to be a leader I can vote for. I dislike the current Tory administration intensely and under normal circumstances I'd be desperate for Labour to get in. But how can I vote for someone who lies so blatantly? Who has failed to stand up for an MP in his own party, Rosie Duffield, who has been relentlessly bullied by party members? Who is pretending that an obvious male, Eddie Izzard, is a woman?

BitOutOfPractice · 31/10/2022 15:43

bellinisurge · 31/10/2022 15:25

@BitOutOfPractice , yes, daring to question the direction taken by the party I have voted for all my life makes me a Torybot. When you are eventually old enough to vote, you can pick who you like.

Wow!

I 100% agree with your views as it happens. And I'm not saying we shouldn't be listened to and campaign for change. But I think publicly slating the LP over and over again on one issue is counter-productive and is handing the Tories a victory they most certainly do NOT deserve based on their record on women's rights and issues that are important to women. That does NOT mean I am telling you to shut up before you decide that! But I am very very bored of the "at least the Tories know what a woman is" line being trotted out as nauseum though!

I'm doing my campaigning within the LP which I have been a member of since the 1980s. Hope that clears up my credentials for you!

Thatsasmashingblouseyouvegoton · 31/10/2022 15:42

bellinisurge · 31/10/2022 15:15

If he can't speak truthfully on this. If he has to pander to extremists in the party using stupid weasel words, why should I listen to anything else he says? Who else would he kowtow to if he was PM?
And , until Corbyn, I'd voted Labour since 1987.
I can't and would not vote Tory.
I remain politically homeless. And I would rather stay out in the cold than lie.

Yep.
Me too.

bellinisurge · 31/10/2022 15:32

They should learn from the Brexit disaster that dismissing people's genuine concerns and assuming they are all trolls and bigots doesn't end well.
I voted Remain btw.

OP posts:
StillWeRise · 31/10/2022 15:26

@BitOutOfPractice you may well be right, and all the more reason why the LP should be reading them and answering our very reasonable concerns

bellinisurge · 31/10/2022 15:25

And I don't think the Tories are friends to women. That's why I won't vote for them.

OP posts:
bellinisurge · 31/10/2022 15:25

@BitOutOfPractice , yes, daring to question the direction taken by the party I have voted for all my life makes me a Torybot. When you are eventually old enough to vote, you can pick who you like.

OP posts:
BitOutOfPractice · 31/10/2022 15:20

I am starting to think that these threads are being started by Tory HQ bots.

Because anyone who thinks the Conservative party is a friend of women is deluded.

bellinisurge · 31/10/2022 15:15

If he can't speak truthfully on this. If he has to pander to extremists in the party using stupid weasel words, why should I listen to anything else he says? Who else would he kowtow to if he was PM?
And , until Corbyn, I'd voted Labour since 1987.
I can't and would not vote Tory.
I remain politically homeless. And I would rather stay out in the cold than lie.

OP posts:
nilsmousehammer · 31/10/2022 15:13

And now link that kind of marketing/manipulative/I will decide reality and tell you plebs what to believe thinking, to the utter arrogance you saw him use in his conversation with Justine.

nilsmousehammer · 31/10/2022 15:11

Thelnebriati · 31/10/2022 15:02

IDK where he's getting his facts from. I'd like him to explain, since he is using them to make up his mind on something that directly affects me.

The whole ideology is based on the belief that emotion and feelings create reality, not facts.

And that you select your preferred reality, by choosing the facts you like and blanking out the ones you don't, and then doing a lot of high handed fast talking, con artistry and marketing (much the same thing) and scolding/punishing so that as many gullible twits as possible believe what you tell them is the truth, and the stubborn bastards who won't are hopefully too scared to contradict you.

That is what this utter muppet has bought into. 'Facts' aren't something he does. This is my first and main reason why any party led by those with such a belief, should never under any circumstances run anything more challenging than a cupcake stall at a village fete.

Really, once you realise you're talking to someone insisting to you that some men are women and that 'only females have cervixes' is something that shouldn't be said, there is zero point in expecting them to make sense on any other subject.

FemaleAndLearning · 31/10/2022 15:06

He really needs to work o. His communication. I recognise this hard because words now have multiple meanings in some people's worlds. Absolutely this is all about men who say they are women. It is so blatant I am just aghast how so many women go along with it and are the foot soldiers. Many of those women are saying they are men or the daft non binary.
As lawyer trained how can Starmer reconcile those men that want to infringe the rights of women and girls. He is living in la la land.

Thelnebriati · 31/10/2022 15:02

IDK where he's getting his facts from. I'd like him to explain, since he is using them to make up his mind on something that directly affects me.

bellinisurge · 31/10/2022 15:00

"I thought he meant for 99% of women biology matters but for the other 1% doesn't because they are transmen. I didn't realise he was saying that 1% of women are men."
The transactivists try and pretend it is about accommodating transmen. It's not. It's about having language describing women and services for women that don't exclude transwomen because it cannot possibly include them. Because transwomen are not women.

OP posts:
bellinisurge · 31/10/2022 14:57

I'll make it easy for you Mr Starmer: Transwomen are transwomen; Transmen are transmen. All individuals deserve to live in peace and safety and to do whatever their thing is as long as nobody else gets hurt. Everyone deserves healthcare that is appropriate for their biological sex. If transwomen feel unsafe in men's spaces, I'm more than happy to have my tax payer money spent on third spaces. Although men could do with more education about it to make them less bigoted. If they really want to, transmen can take their chances in men's toilets, changing rooms etc but they are welcome with women because they are biological women. Transmen are also welcome in women's sports as long as they haven't doped.
I will even tolerate healthcare info which says "women and transmen". I will not tolerate "cervix-havers" and other indecipherable bullshit.
And "non-binary" is deluded narcissistic nonsense. Happy for anyone to be a deluded narcissist but I will not change women's words and women's spaces to accommodate them.

OP posts:
Girlsontour · 31/10/2022 14:56

Yep, it’s all this nonsense that will most likely add to the “Red Wave” expected in the national midterm elections. Here in the USA red is the Republican color, rather than the left (yes, I know, strange!). So many people are getting fed up about being openly lied to about what everyone can see is a man : Rachel Levine and Lia Thomas for example. People don’t appreciate being treated like idiots.

Findwen · 31/10/2022 14:54

Less than 0.1% of people murder, I don't think their effect on society should be ignored because they are a small percentage.