Starmer and his 99.9%

FunnyTalks · Today 09:55
I am struggling to get past Filia and the Labour Women's Declaration being denied stalls at the Labour Party conference. Which weren't even refilled for the event

That action is the Labour Party actually stifling women's speech and feminist thought.

What words can Starmer give us to make up for that action?

He has probably worked out that he represents more women Be-Kinds as a percentage than he represents suppressed women who see this new oppression.

So he may feel smug and secure about those women he has been cancelling. He’ll probably be careful to evade any questions about it though.

I am struggling to get past Filia and the Labour Women's Declaration being denied stalls at the Labour Party conference. Which weren't even refilled for the event.

That action is the Labour Party actually stifling women's speech and feminist thought.

What words can Starmer give us to make up for that action?

GR for Gender Reassignment and GRC Gender Recognition Certificate is all so confusing. I don’t believe that in practice most people know what either means in law or would dare to tempt legal trouble by excluding any form of man identifying as a woman.

The .1% is, i think based on the number of people with a GRC. But hes ignoring those men with the protected characteristic of GR.

What he should have been asked is:

Should born male with a GRC be able to use womens single sex spaces?

If not, how will that be enforced?

If they can, what facilities do women use who cannot share facilities with born males?

Should men with the PC of GR be allowed to use womens spaces?

If yes, what are the numbers? And how do we determine which men have the PC of GR and those who do not?

Given some born males are given strong female id without a GRC, how do service providers determine the difference between the .1% and those self identified male born women?

minipie 31/10/2022 14:08
What’s he trying to say with his 99.9% point? That this isn’t a big deal?

Well yes it is if that 0.1% are allowed into women’s safe spaces and sports. 0.1% is enough to have a significant effect on the women who have to share those spaces with them.

If they just let one man into a women’s prison for every 1000 women, or one male Olympic athlete into every women’s Olympic event, would he think that was ok? As it’s just 0.1%?

Not to mention the erasure of the meaning of the word woman as pp have said. Does dog still mean dog if 0.1% of dogs are actually cats? No it doesn’t.

I think many more than 1 in 1000 people are MtF transgender now.

Dogwhistle.

Noun.

Meanings:

Shut up
Shutupshutupshutup
That conversation is really inconvenient and I don't want to have it
These are facts and thoughts that risk believers being drawn away from the One True Faith if permitted to enter their heads
Paniiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiic

Did that drive by poster explain what rights are being lost?

• they never do
• the right to unfairly subordinate and exclude females and to own/control all female spaces
• to trump and oppress female rights

In essence. Oddly no one ever wishes to state this or defend it.

Quite.

It won't be long before saying 'dog whistle' becomes a 'dog whistle'.

Awesome. Just call me Barbara Woodhouse then.

Since reality does not align with gender ideology, any true statement aboir sex or gender unavoidably becomes a dog whistle.

Is any word not a dog whistle now?

Also the word families is a dog whistle now too.

the dominant class get to say This Never Happens.
the affected class are left with #metoo

Flouncers corner is that way —————>

oh.... I missed the flounce bit

78 states / countries / provinces

I have repeatedly asked you to list the 78 or link to the official list on several threads. Im still waiting on your evidence. Please provide otherwise I'm going to assume you are being evasive deliberately and anything you post won't be taken seriously in future.

This Never Happens, ay right, just as you say. Ta ra.

Us guys?

It's definitely you guys, not us guys. We aren't guys.

Don't let the door hit you on the arse on the way out.

I think at some point you guys have to understand that you're not going to be able to remove our rights under the EA and GRA, as much as you may desire to. Reform of the GRA is almost inevitable as well - what you gonna do when, like in 78 states / countries / provinces, nothing happens at all?

I believe that why you're so bothered about Scotland - you know it'll show the 'gender critical' fearmongering to be a lie.

On the plus side for you, looks like you'll get Twitter, trans ppl are finding alternatives in their droves and it looks like Musky wants to make it into a slightly more attractive 4 chan. Already had my 2nd death threat in 2 weeks (one from a 'GC' and the other from someone aligned with you)..joys.

Anyway..have fun with your new friends. I'll be trashing this account as I am doing with my Twitter, hopefully never to have the misfortune to meet a hideous 'GC' ever again

They are confusing social transition which is not medical with Gillick Competence. Is this a deliberate conflation?
twitter.com/FurnessYoungLab/status/1587557840121733122?t=LHFKbYYKBxCQboCJjQwq3w&s=19