Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Kellie-Jay Keen (AKA Posie Parker) appreciation thread

986 replies

TotallyTERF · 25/10/2022 18:35

I just love this woman! She undoubtedly has the Midas touch when it comes to marketing and publicity.

I have been to several of her events over the years, and she has time for each and every woman who comes to see her.

Any other fans here?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
31
TheClogLady · 13/01/2023 13:59

See comparison to Annika Rice upthread!

Maybe we could start dropping Posie off via helicopter? Coming down a rope ladder would be an interesting entrance and useful for avoiding protestors?

twitter.com/AnnekaRice/status/1442229305828798465/mediaViewer?currentTweet=1442229305828798465&currentTweetUser=AnnekaRice

beastlyslumber · 13/01/2023 13:58

suggestionsplease1 · 13/01/2023 13:18

So what are the lies that have been said about KJK?

And I suppose it's you/ GC feminists in general that get to determine what is a fact, what is opinion, what is truth, what Is lies? Am I right?

No darling. There's such a thing as verifiable fact. If someone claims that KJK is a holocaust denier, they need to support that claim with evidence. If they can't, then it's a lie.

ArabellaScott · 13/01/2023 13:54

citywire.com/americas/news/hsbc-private-banks-top-gatekeeper-handed-expanded-role/a1475196

'HSBC Private Bank's top gatekeeper handed expanded role'

Can we get back to the point of the thread now, please?

ArabellaScott · 13/01/2023 13:53

citywire.com/americas/news/senior-hsbc-private-bank-gatekeeper-exits-after-15-years/a2404855

'Senior HSBC Private Bank gatekeeper exits after 15 years'

ArabellaScott · 13/01/2023 13:51

“I gatekeep the diversity policy at HSBC” said no one ever.

Tell that to Reshma Moloo.

'HSBC Private Bank has hired ex-Citi Private Bank gatekeeper Reshma Moloo in a wider move to create 10 new roles to strengthen its funds and ETFs coverage.'

citywire.com/pro-buyer/news/ex-citi-pb-gatekeeper-resurfaces-at-hsbc-private-bank/a1166704

NecessaryScene · 13/01/2023 13:50

(talking to anyone who stands still long enough to hear)

I'm now pondering if that condition is necessary, how fast-moving she is, and whether the jumpsuits are to maintain speed with a moving target.

BernardBlacksMolluscs · 13/01/2023 13:48

I think it might be doofus day in East London

TheClogLady · 13/01/2023 13:45

Helleofabore · 13/01/2023 13:33

I don't think at this stage your commentary on political strategy is particularly credible.

Be Kind, Helle!
ELO is just here to give Posie some constructive criticism in order to improve the GC political strategy!

it’s not necessary, of course, because GC isn’t one thing and various people are engaging in various strategies so WPUK are already doing it ELO’s preferred way (lefty purity) while Posie is doing things her way (talking to anyone who stands still long enough to hear) and indeed various other grassroots orgs are developing their own strategies, some feminist, eg FPFW and some materialist eg Sex Matters and some child safeguarding focused eg Safe Schools Alliance and some LGB focused eg the Gay Men’s Network and Get the L Out! Just a handful of examples of the many out there.

Still, it is very generous of ELO to offer Posie free advice, even tho ELO is well aware Posie would tell him/her/xer/per/them to cock right off.

NecessaryScene · 13/01/2023 13:45

But the conferences where she is appearing with far right/social conservative/anti abortion/anti LGB speakers

Such as? I'm actually drawing a blank here. She doesn't really do conferences at all, preferring to do her own public-square campaigning.

I can't actually remember seeing her at one since the Jam Jar event at Bristol, where the speakers were the complete opposite.

(Sticking in the link because I love it - it's a great bit of history, and you've got the epic impromptu Magdalen Berns appearance at 1:54).

Anyone else got any links to anything more recent?

its a dumb, self defeating political strategy.

Someone who really thinks their opponent is using a dumb, self-defeating political strategy wouldn't spend all their time explaining how dumb and self-defeating it was.

Unless their own strategy was incredibly dumb and self-defeating. Therefore if her strategy is dumb and self-defeating, so is yours, so you're the last person to listen to with strategic advice on how to change it.

PomegranateOfPersephone · 13/01/2023 13:37

EastLondonObserver · 13/01/2023 13:30

But the conferences where she is appearing with far right/social conservative/anti abortion/anti LGB speakers aren’t engaging with diverse audiences at all. She is preaching to the converted, which is why she is invited. And the audiences she speaks to are, for the most part, small.

Appearing alongside these types is self defeating. This is because to have any meaningful effect she will have to appeal to a broad audience and these associations means most mainstream media won’t touch her with a barge pole, and she’s relegated to low-audience bottom feeders like GB News.

its a dumb, self defeating political strategy.

And yet it seems to work rather effectively 🤔

Also it is okay to talk to and associate with people who have different opinions to you on a variety of topics. I don’t know how any society, community or family would function without dialogue and associations between people who have different opinions.

Helleofabore · 13/01/2023 13:33

I don't think at this stage your commentary on political strategy is particularly credible.

EastLondonObserver · 13/01/2023 13:30

Helleofabore · 13/01/2023 10:18

I recommend any reader, and you particularly, use google. And see for themselves the wide range of usage for the term. It really does cover many disciplines.

And yet, just because you personally don't understand when gatekeeping is happening to you so you can use the term effectively, doesn't also mean others don't understand and will use the term.

You seem to be well stuck in a rut with repeating "holocaust deniers, anti abortionists". (I see you have started repeating US Social conservatives and now also anti-LGB bods too)

I read your OP in one of your threads that you were in advertising for 25 years! So, I guess you work on the principle that if you repeat something enough times that you will eventually convince someone.

"Yes, there’s some logic in attacking accusations of “guilt by association”. But this isn’t an undergrad seminar, it’s real world politics. The company you keep has a significant effect on your appeal."

And there is both the sleight of hand dishonesty and the very tight purity spiral polarisation.

"But this isn’t an undergrad seminar, it’s real world politics."

You obviously haven't actually thought this through.

Real world politics is ALL about presenting to a wide range of people, even those you disagree with.

Real world politics means working on committees with people you don't agree with on many, if any things, but want to make sure of an outcome that you can live with.

Real world politics means having photos taken with people you abhor.

"The company you keep has a significant effect on your appeal"

The 'company' you keep. Who is she 'keeping company with'? You mean friends? Who are her 'friends'? Do you not have friends and family you disagree with but still love? Well... adulting is very hard, we know.

Or do you mean being seen at the same conferences or events with? Do you believe that politicians never attend a conference that they disagree with the organisers on to present an alternative view? Do you believe that politicians only ever give interviews to channels that fit the purity they desire to be associated with?

Your example is quite something.

You are either now declaring that KJK is best friends with holocaust deniers,

or

you are trying to tell us that politicians don't ever appear on a program, an event or a media channel unless everything about those programs and events and media (organisers, audience and other speakers) 100% fit all their beliefs.

or

you really don't have much real life experience outside a very curated bubble.

But the conferences where she is appearing with far right/social conservative/anti abortion/anti LGB speakers aren’t engaging with diverse audiences at all. She is preaching to the converted, which is why she is invited. And the audiences she speaks to are, for the most part, small.

Appearing alongside these types is self defeating. This is because to have any meaningful effect she will have to appeal to a broad audience and these associations means most mainstream media won’t touch her with a barge pole, and she’s relegated to low-audience bottom feeders like GB News.

its a dumb, self defeating political strategy.

Helleofabore · 13/01/2023 13:22

“I gatekeep the diversity policy at HSBC” said no one ever.

Actually, they very well could do!

Are you so lacking in how organisations actually work that you don't understand the relevance of this example you just posted.

If someone is actually making the decisions about what to have in the policy or not, THEY ARE GATEKEEPING THE POLICY.

They may or may not say it. It is more likely that they will be accused of it.

Really, stop with the fuckwittery.

Helleofabore · 13/01/2023 13:19

FFS. I have my Marketing text book right here in front of me from 1991. It discusses 'gatekeeping' under the chapters about Industrial Buying Processes and communicating to opinion leaders. That is just one text book.

I also remember it discussed rather a lot in my Organisational Behaviour unit. And I remember it discussed very clearly in the sales theory courses and practical courses. And in business strategy unit.

You are absolutely talking bollocks when you say It’s not - and certainly not in business, contrary to what has been suggested upthread.

Look.... here ... very first google entry regarding 'marketing'

www.indeed.com/career-advice/career-development/gatekeeper-marketing

I know you said you worked in advertising ELO but I cannot believe it when you come out with absolute bollocks like this. Or were you only ever involved in the creation side and NEVER actually on the business side of Advertising?

You really could have just googled, yet didn't seem to be able to.

I am quite sure that readers did and saw your fuckwittery for what it is.

I only highlighted it because you have continued with the same kind of fuckwittery on this thread too. The fuckwittery of just typing 'holocaust denial' and believing that anyone will actually believe you.

suggestionsplease1 · 13/01/2023 13:18

beastlyslumber · 13/01/2023 12:44

What do you think free speech is @suggestionsplease1 ? It's not the right to say anything you like unchallenged. If you want to speak, expect to be challenged and have to defend your speech.

If people want to come onto an appreciation thread and tell lies about the subject of the thread, then they can't honestly expect that to go unchallenged. Of course they're going to be asked to defend their speech, bring evidence, build a coherent argument, etc. And of course people are going to question their motivations in commenting off topic in this thread, rather than starting a thread of their own.

So what are the lies that have been said about KJK?

And I suppose it's you/ GC feminists in general that get to determine what is a fact, what is opinion, what is truth, what Is lies? Am I right?

ArabellaScott · 13/01/2023 12:59

Of course some people will invent the most absurd straw squirrels to detract from the point of the thread.

beastlyslumber · 13/01/2023 12:56

EastLondonObserver · 13/01/2023 12:47

The debate I opened up wasn’t about what it means. You can scroll back and see for yourself.

It was about whether “to gatekeep” is commonly used - i.e. as a verb.

It’s not - and certainly not in business, contrary to what has been suggested upthread.

“I gatekeep the diversity policy at HSBC” said no one ever.

You must know this is nonsense.

What would it be, if not a verb? You can't really use it as a noun, can you? It's not an adjective or an adverb or a preposition or a conjunction.

Here's a dictionary definition for you:

gatekeep
verb

  1. To limit (sometimes manipulatively, rather than directly) how much role another party, often a spouse, has in some task; for example, to limit how much one's husband can raise one's children
  2. To control or limit access to something
ArabellaScott · 13/01/2023 12:50

RufusthefIoraImissingreindeer · 13/01/2023 11:03

There was a thread on aibu the other day

Something like 'does everyone like their Samsung telly'

2nd post on was 'I don't have a telly'

I mean why? What's the point?

😂you've got to admire that, on some level!

SinnerBoy · 13/01/2023 12:48

Really, Marg, you are a billy of the very silliest variety!

EastLondonObserver · 13/01/2023 12:47

RufusthefIoraImissingreindeer · 13/01/2023 10:14

I really think you should give this one up, the more you protest the more it sounds like you just didn't know what gatekeeping means.

Verb or no, you know what it means

Whether you feel a word is being used incorrectly as a verb or not doesnt affect the intention

If someone on here said they were feministing or womanning wrong it doesn't take a genius to work out what they mean

The debate I opened up wasn’t about what it means. You can scroll back and see for yourself.

It was about whether “to gatekeep” is commonly used - i.e. as a verb.

It’s not - and certainly not in business, contrary to what has been suggested upthread.

“I gatekeep the diversity policy at HSBC” said no one ever.

beastlyslumber · 13/01/2023 12:44

What do you think free speech is @suggestionsplease1 ? It's not the right to say anything you like unchallenged. If you want to speak, expect to be challenged and have to defend your speech.

If people want to come onto an appreciation thread and tell lies about the subject of the thread, then they can't honestly expect that to go unchallenged. Of course they're going to be asked to defend their speech, bring evidence, build a coherent argument, etc. And of course people are going to question their motivations in commenting off topic in this thread, rather than starting a thread of their own.

beastlyslumber · 13/01/2023 12:38

LOL. I think you'll find that even incredibly annoying people who tell lies and insult others are allowed to speak on these boards. The only thing TRAs ever get reported for is transphobia, racism or personal attacks.

It's hardly shutting down free speech to ask people to take their hatred to a different thread.

DaughterOfPsychiatrist · 13/01/2023 12:20

suggestionsplease1 · 13/01/2023 11:16

I'm pretty clear you have no concept of the idea of free speech!

So if someone posted an appreciation thread for a surgeon carrying out gender affirmation surgery here, you, and all other GC feminists on these boards, would presumably let others crack on with that appreciation?

Or would you be hypocritical and maybe post something?

I think we’d probably just point out this was unlikely to be an efficient board for such a post?

Much tidier to mod-move it to the LGBT Parents section (although MN might have concerns that it was advertising-by-subterfuge and remove it, which would be their right).

Such a thread would be likely to gain a more appropriate audience over on one of the two transgender uk-specific subreddits or the transgender surgeries sub, or one of the many transgender topic Facebook groups or forums (such as Susan’s Place or TS Angels).

HTH!

Datun · 13/01/2023 12:11

suggestionsplease1 · 13/01/2023 11:16

I'm pretty clear you have no concept of the idea of free speech!

So if someone posted an appreciation thread for a surgeon carrying out gender affirmation surgery here, you, and all other GC feminists on these boards, would presumably let others crack on with that appreciation?

Or would you be hypocritical and maybe post something?

Good lord.

The denial of free speech is not women objecting to an oddly repetitive poster blurting out 'Holocaust denier' every other post! 😁

honestly. These people.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 13/01/2023 11:27

NecessaryScene · 13/01/2023 08:10

I guess when you're someone who advocates for letting men into women's prisons you have to try really really hard to find some way to make anyone look morally worse than yourself.

So you have to do things like say "holocaust denial" a lot.

It's a weird sort of whataboutism - "okay, a lot of women might get raped in my plan, but don't think about that - think about the holocaust, it's not as bad as that".

But even then it doesn't work because even a holocaust denier isn't actively supporting an ongoing holocaust, unlike those who are actively supporting putting men into women's prison's now.

Those like ELO supporting that are directly supporting an immediate ongoing crime against humanity.*

They don't get to have any moral high ground by being concerned about previous ones.

"Okay, so I'm doing this to you, but I feel really bad about what happened to those other people. Don't go asking her for help - she once stood next to someone who thinks that other thing didn't happen. So I'm just going to keep doing it. Shut up."

Totally normal non-psychopathic behaviour.

*(Yes, sorry, women do count as humanity. Sorry to be pedantic about this.)

This.