Iowa mum attends school board meeting in matching outfit to Drag Queen school visitor.

When as many as 95% of the population share the same view (that this is inappropriate), you're inevitably going to have quite a broad coalition.

The article in question: www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-oxfordshire-62639419

BBC's 'disinformation teams'
Oh the irony. 🤣

'Thank you for getting in touch about our article Supporters and protesters turn out at Oxford drag queen kids' storytime.

We think the article is clear that not all of those in attendance belong to far-right or conspiracy theory groups.

However it does make clear that the protests were planned and that “the personalities behind the demonstrations in Bristol and Reading are well known figures on conspiracy theory-based social media groups”.

It’s also explained that “among” the group was “Alpha Men Assemble” and, again, that doesn’t suggest they were exclusively the group there.

We know this because our disinformation teams have been following these groups for some time and, indeed, they live streamed their protest.'

Best wishes,
Sean Moss
BBC News website
www.bbc.co.uk/complaints

It is a deliberate strategy. I complained to the BBC after its article on the women protesting outside one of the DQST sessions were bagged up with militanr RW groups. I'll copy the response I got in another post.

I think it's a deliberate strategy.
Since I moved from the UK to Ireland it became really clear.In the UK accusing women who speak out of being right wing is an effective divide and conquer but it doesn't work in the much less liberal Ireland. Here the strategy is to say and woman in Ireland is English and therefore the oppressor.

It's super effective and I'd be willing to bet these local dividers are used wherever you go.

It appears that they're determined that anything women say and do in relation to safeguarding children is stopped. Attempting to smear them as "wrongthinkers" is a common tactic.

I try to assume that these people are simply naive but given the exposure of the impact of queer theory in the paedophile scandal at the Tavistock, I'm starting to wonder whether it is actually more sinister.

“We don’t really have an equivalent to cheerleaders in UK culture, so it’s hard to imagine what it might be like in school context - hopefully not a bad as the little-girl pageant stuff (we don’t really have that either)!”

Incredibly gymnastic; nothing like the movies. It’s sort of a cross between circus skills and gymnastics, lots of teamwork, tumbling skills, some dance. Those skimpy outfits are usually sports clothes with a short skirt added over the shorts. Any guys will probably be in the equivalent of tracksuits, because they’ll be doing the strength work and major lifts.

I've tried to find what reprehensible views Iowa Mama Bears have that I am aligning with as no-one here will say what they are.

According to the statement on their private FB group it seems they are opposed to gun regulation and opposed to children wearing compulsory masks in schools. So perfectly mainstream views that many people (including liberals) in the USA and elsewhere have.

Is there anything I am missing?

FFS! Why are more people bothered about the word align rather than what the actual post is about.

Its ridiculous!

She made her point well!

Yes, very well put. And (now that my eyes have been opened to the paedophile manifesto) it's important not to let anyone hook "removing children's sexual boundaries" onto "being progressive and left wing".

This is really effective.

the problem is not gender non-confirming clothing. Presenters who do not conform to stereotypes and present diverse ways of living can be positive role models. We want to get rid of the shackles of pink and blue.

the problem has always been that the presenters are not simply gender non-conforming, they present a sexualized caricature of females.

This is highly effective. Far more effective than anything so far. Good for her.

Whatever else she's part of, we are united on this issue. MRAs want to divide and conqueur.

Great job

I have no idea on the club she is part of but the visual impact is effective

This! A thousand times this!

In that case, all those supporting gender ideology must be aligned with the pro pedophilia community?

If you're not aligned with this woman on this point. THEN you're aligned with groomers, those who wish to sexualise children and paedophiles.

That's OTT, but reminds me of something James Lindsay said the other day, in his latest Benjamin Boyce interview, wrt calling people "groomers".

When I use a label, I'm not classically an essentialist, but I want that word to capture the essence of what's going on.

And so why do I call people who are grooming "groomers"? I'm playing a little there, but the reason is they're groomers. They're essentially engaging in the psychological grooming of children.

So that's why. And I'm playing a little bit there, because... they've decided that racism can be structural, so I decided that grooming can be structural. If there's an entire apparatus that upholds a small number of people grooming, but most people aren't directly involved in grooming, aren't they structually groomers? According to their own logic, yes. And I do believe in that point from Alinsky, you should hold your opponent to their own standards.

As far as I can tell, all this 'you shouldn't be aligned with this person because X' is a deliberate tactic trying to shame women into not supporting other women who are trying to make children safer.

Women say 'no'. Child safety is too important.

I'm sure I don't agree with this woman on everything. Maybe she has views I find pretty awful on other issues. Don't care, child safety is my number 1 issue. It is for most Mums.

I don't agree with KJK on everything either but the more the MRAs try and tell me I shouldn't agree with her on child safety because she's right wing (or whatever other bollocks they've come up with) the more I realise that some people are ACTIVELY trying to undermine child safety and to attack those women trying to protect children from harm.

It's pretty clear that they don't see woman as fully human because they don't understand that we are - in fact- intelligent enough to understand nuance and - shock! - agree with some people on some issues but not others.

I mean, by this standard of needing to be totally 'aligned' all vegetarians also agree with the genocide of Jews (Hitler was a vegetarian). Which is obviously utterly ridiculous.

I like to hold my breath while swimming under water. I hope you don’t drown whilst trying to decide if I’m pure enough to agree with 🤦‍♀️🙄

Gosh this