Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Social Work England leaves Stonewall Diversity Champions

37 replies

ImNotAnExpert · 13/09/2022 19:26

www.communitycare.co.uk/2022/09/13/social-work-england-swaps-stonewall-lgbt-foundation/

'Social Work England has left a Stonewall scheme designed to increase inclusion for LGBTQ+ staff in favour of an alternative training programme.

The regulator said it was joining charity the LGBT Foundation’s training academy, on the grounds that it was a better fit for delivering its equality, diversity and inclusion action plan, published in February, than Stonewall’s diversity champions scheme.'

...

'Despite its growth, a number of high-profile public bodies have left diversity champions over the past 18 months, including the BBC, the Equality and Human Rights Commission, the Department for Education and Department of Health and Social Care.

Though these organisations have made limited comment on their reasons for leaving, the departures have been linked in media reports to Stonewall’s stance in the public debate around gender identity and sex. Its view, that trans people should always be able to self-determine their gender and access services and recognition on that basis, is opposed by those who hold the gender-critical belief that this would, in certain circumstances, undermine women’s sex-based rights, for example, access to single-sex spaces.

Social Work England said leaving diversity champions was a business decision, not linked to these issues.'

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
ImNotAnExpert · 13/09/2022 20:47

FemaleAndLearning · 13/09/2022 20:41

Oh that's enough research.

Amazing.

OP posts:
TheClogLady · 13/09/2022 20:44

It’s like an awful, post modern, political version of Whacka Mole.

FemaleAndLearning · 13/09/2022 20:41

Oh that's enough research.

Social Work England leaves Stonewall Diversity Champions
Social Work England leaves Stonewall Diversity Champions
FemaleAndLearning · 13/09/2022 20:38

Good news, but....goes off to research.

Hoardasurass · 13/09/2022 20:38

What this says to me is that basically we need to make it illegal for any government department to pay to be lobbied by any group or they are just going to keep swapping groups when we prove each group is just as dodgy as stonewall is

DownTheBackoftheSofa · 13/09/2022 20:35

It's good news even if not perfect news. Anything that diminishes Stonewall's grip on institutions is welcome.

WindmillOfWimbledon · 13/09/2022 20:23

LGBT fdn is from the same stable as Stonewall.

ImNotAnExpert · 13/09/2022 20:21

Yes, I'm not sure LGBT Foundation are any better, tbh.

OP posts:
bellinisurge · 13/09/2022 20:07

Yeah, Paul Robert's performance will warrant some reflection

Theeyeballsinthesky · 13/09/2022 19:48

Ha! They obviously didn’t catch the LGBT CEO Paul Roberts performance at the LGBA v Mermaids hearing!

TheClogLady · 13/09/2022 19:39

this is good news!

but…

‘The regulator said it was joining charity the LGBT Foundation’s training academy, on the grounds that it was a better fit for delivering its equality, diversity and inclusion action plan, published in February, than Stonewall’s diversity champions scheme.‘

why is it a better fit?

Because it’s equality law compliant?

Because it’s cheaper?

or because it’s not reputationally damaged?

Motnight · 13/09/2022 19:27

Brilliant news, thanks Op for posting