See, I don't think his conduct is the worst thing here. Certainly as in the Cass Report it was outlined how damning it may be children when adults (ostensibly in positions of care) merrily put them on the conveyer belt. Towards.. who knows.
It is promoting 'stuff' which is anti reality, anti scientific and is damaging to women and children. I always think the chappies who like this stuff (or don't call it out) are a little suspect imo. Rather like those who used to move priests (from the last religion) onto new parishes - and fresh parishioners.
Is his family background the most important thing here?