The response also includes some advice received by the complaints Sub-Committee that they considered in their decision.
They were advised that gender critical beliefs are protected and that holding or expressing them is fine.
And that only misgendering isn't. t.co/YE9KLhgF7R
You can see where this is going.
The committee found that this tweet was fine and no further action was required.
The committee specifically decided that calling a trans woman 'male' is not misgendering her, because no pronouns were used.
I literally cannot with this. t.co/80xiwV3AXj
No breach of the provisions of the code of conduct. That explicitly require objectivity, treating others with dignity and respect, and harrassing or bullying anyone.
Read that tweet. Read the code of conduct. Then read this finding.
Maya lost and still totally fucked us. t.co/9nvvobs8xh
Going to go ahead and tag @GoodLawProject @JolyonMaugham @DisabledJess @truesolicitor in this as I think it's an important example of the impact that the gender critical court cases have had and. I just don't know if there's any recourse, anything we can do about this?
Just coming back to this bit, in combination with the final finding:
-Expressing GC beliefs is protected.
-As long as you don't use the wrong pronouns.
-Referring to trans people by 'birth sex' is fine.
-And calling a GC a bigot is unlawful harrassment.
t.co/ecV94wMXNG
Additional tag for @NancyMK - not sure if this is something Stonewall can do... Literally anything about, or has any thoughts on, or anything?