Harry miller arrested

From LBC

Previously, people accused of racism, sexism, misogyny and transphobia in Hampshire would have been offered a two-hour educational session instead of prosecution

There is no way to prosecute people for sexism or misogyny. This is not about women.

www.lbc.co.uk/news/hate-crime-awareness-courses-scrapped-police/

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11089847/Hate-crime-awareness-courses-SCRAPPED-Hampshire-police-following-controversy.html

Facebook themselves deem them ok I reported a comment about sen children how they shouldn't be treated for covid as they are not productive members of society (not put like that but im not going to repeat what was said) I commented "your nasty" guess who got banned for bullying and threats? Me, just me, as far as I know their comment still stands mine was deleted for harassment

Sometimes the numbers need to be very large, and sometimes the numbers need to be very small. It depends on what suits the argument.

For some reason it brings to mind Father Dougal and the small or far away conundrum.

I think it's numbers, they want as many transpeople as possible as a lobby both directly and indirectly via families and friends. The individuals don't matter, it's the numbers.

Re "gender critical", I think it's unfortunately easy to misrepresent it to transactivists and woo types as meaning "critical of" (i.e. hateful towards) "gender" (meaning "genderqueer", gender nonconformity of any kind, or LGBTQA+++ in general).

Of course that's not what it means and anyone with the remotest capacity for analytical thought would wonder why large numbers of GC people are themselves lesbian, gay and/or GNC feminists.

they should be furious that those kids they perceive as trans are being let down so badly, not granted the normal safety procedures and treated as guinea pigs

Yes, and it speaks volumes that they're not.

Laurence Fox is going on Tucker Carlson tonight

Concern about gender ideology leading to medical malpractice isn't just GC viewpoint, really.

Absolutely. One of the weirdest things about all this is that this should be a concern for, most of all, the trans lobby itself. If "trans healthcare" (as they describe it) involves using drugs with known harmful side effects in an untested way and not following up experimental treatments to monitor outcomes, they should be furious that those kids they perceive as trans are being let down so badly, not granted the normal safety procedures and treated as guinea pigs.

No its not mangy

and women’s safety in sports is a general’well that doesn’t make sense’ moment for a lot of people

GC seems to have changed in meaning when this all kicked off a few years ago it seemed to mean being critical of gender stereotypes and the damage they cause

thinking that its not possible to change sex, that people shouldn’t be pushed down a path of lifetime medication and surgery as step one and that self id has huge issues are not niche views

loads of people think those things

Concern about gender ideology leading to medical malpractice isn't just GC viewpoint, really.

I'm no fan at all of LF or TC but ultimately gender ideology is such nonsense and affects so many area of life that other groups (free speech, conservative etc) are bound to highlight it too.

Andrew Doyle on GB News (gasp) mentioned the other day that Kemi Badenoch said that it's because of the work by leftist feminists that she's been able to challenge trans ideology at Westminster. Everyone needs to be talking about this regardless of their political leanings.

Maybe in a decade or so the left wing media will be covering the atrocities of experimental 'treatments' given to young people but we're a long way from that, unfortunately. And America is even more hostage to trans ideology than the U.K.

I'd rather not have LF as a front for GC views, for record.

Just saying (not picking a fight)

Laurence Fox is going on Tucker Carlson tonight to talk about the Harry Miller arrest and spread the GC message.

This is from the CPS website:

The law recognises five types of hate crime on the basis of:
Race
Religion
Disability
Sexual orientation
Transgender identity
Any crime can be prosecuted as a hate crime if the offender has either:
demonstrated hostility based on race, religion, disability, sexual orientation or transgender identity
Or
been motivated by hostility based on race, religion, disability, sexual orientation or transgender identity
Someone can be a victim of more than one type of hate crime.

If you report that you find tweets/posts offensive because they are offensive to lesbian i.e. homosexual women, you might have a shout.

Although frankly why not report some as them as offensive to the sexual orientation of being a hetereosexual or bisexual woman? Or women who are not NT? Or women who are of a religion that relies on same-sex spaces for religious cleansing rituals? It's all nuts.

Sorry, to add, the white space between images too should be looked at carefully to see if it made a swastika or the like. Not just the image if that makes sense

It's a long time ago I did a short design course, local authority thing, free with childcare , stuff you do for references. One of the first lessons was on how your design could be (like this pride flag thing) used in a way to mimic iirc
Deus vault, Confederate flag, a noose unless that's what you were aiming at, and some others I cant remember now.
And this was a local college, part time 12 week course. So if it was covered there, I imagine a full blown degree might cover it too.

Has anyone tried reporting anti-women tweets/FB posts to the police? I find those offensive. Do they qualify as hate incidents? I'm guessing not, as the College of Police guidance left out sex when it defined hate crimes/incidents.

I remember being on a design course, fiddling around with an image of a toucan which I'd drawn, & accidentally coming up with swastikas when I repeated & translated the image - that one got ditched pretty quickly!

I didn't know there was a general rule about it, though.

I have to say I was a little tongue in cheek with that remark.
Nevertheless, it is inherent in the way the flags are designed; whether the designer was clueless or not.

It may have been beyond the designers wit/capacity/competency to envisage how the flag (they designed) would look like a swastika when laid out like this. Yet, they did design it like that. Maybe the polis should take them in for questioning or re-education.

GC has no issue with LGB. The issues are with the authoritarian, ideology-pushing, bullying behaviour of the T.

I don't think it was a deliberate design choice, but maybe in this crazy world that wouldn't matter to the police!

Yes, Labour take note

@commonsense61 I think it's all bollocks too.

Also, apparently the flags are designed so that when you just lay them down a certain way (without interfering or doctoring them at all) they form a swastika.

Surely the person who designed the flag should be the one arrested, this is woke nonsense gone mad.