Stonewall have change the word “research”

No more ‘gender disappointment’ threads then…

Just the kind of irony that makes you want to weep.

Absolutely!

Following this trajectory, soon parents will be free to choose their newborns 'gender' rather than their sex being observed and recorded. The parents will say I feel this is a girl because baby made cute squeaky little sounds when she was born or we feel this is a boy because he roared like an angry feisty bear baby when I pushed him out.

Why isn't the NSPCC all over this?

More codswallop from Stonewall

Someone on their twitter team forgot to turn off replies I reckon, you wouldn't normally see this kind of dangerous bollocks spouted without blocking replies first. They want to carry on showing everyone who they really are, fine by me, maybe it'll get their claws out of their "champions" sooner when they see who and what they're giving money to.

It's good to see everyone really push back on this. Like the recent You Gov poll, people want to be kind and tolerant - but it was never enough, and now they've pushed this onto sports and kids it's a hard no now.

It's a shame that it wasn't enough when women said no, and we would have never got to the 2 year olds know they are transgender crap we see today. And Stonewall may still well have stood for something good, but they are way past saving.

Metro don't seem to allow comments on any of their nonsensical trans articles anymore. That's because they know what all the comments would say!

It is hugely concerning. The fact that a whole agenda is presenting putting kids into categories and herding them towards the ones that suit the agenda as ‘letting kids explore’ is awful. As is the fact that naive fools who think they’re progressive and ‘on the right side of history’ applaud this.

It’s still unintentionally ironic though. Just the kind of irony that makes you want to weep.

Can I give the unintentional irony award for today to this reply please.

I find this hugely concerning. LGBTQ books and activities have already found their way into EY settings.

A recent primary school assembly on LGBTQ resulted in several 8 & 9 year old girls 'coming out' as lesbians. This caused a big issue and many playground tiffs. 8 & 9 year old do not need lessons on being gay.it can wait until at least 5 & 6.

The rainbow flag is firmly embedded in many British nurseries and primary schools. It will creep further down the age ladder until babies are outed as LGBTQ+++++ by their loving parents and care takers.

But, hey, nothing to see here right?

Can I give the unintentional irony award for today to this reply please.

Maybe it's some of Diane Ehrensaft's research. She believes that even babies can know if they are transgender.

I suspect that the reception teacher who told the little girl that she is always a girl was very much aware of what is clearly extremely strong encouragement to identify as a boy from the parents. I’d imagine that teacher has a great deal to say about that particular situation.

The tweet has an encouraging ratio. What a load of bollocks they spout!

Great work stonewall... this is gonna peak loads of people.

Love it when they shoot off an own goal like this.

Those parents are unhinged and SS should be keeping a very close eye.

Dear lord. So the mother's attitude to females is being pressed on the (female) child.

The fact that it's so disturbing is one thing. Newspapers and government funded charities endorsing it, is quite another. Horrifying.

Before the organisations, schools and local authorities safeguarding children were captured by Stonewall, GIRES, Gendered Intelligence, Global Butterflies etc, they would never have allowed any organisation to push an ideology at children - especially one that promotes regressive stereotypes and advocates drugs and surgery to children.
Now - who knows? It seems the government were slowly waking up to the harm that's been visited on children by these groups with ministers for education, health in particular starting to lead a roll back. Now with all the chaos in government - who knows? It's in times of chaos that those seeking to disguise their intentions often exploit the system so I'm not surprised to see the increased targeting of the very young and vulnerable at this time.

Bloody hell 😯

They are showing very clearly that they don’t understand child development and it’s dangerous that they are allowed anywhere near schools.

Who can we complain to?

'She’ll talk about stereotypically girly things like princesses in a way that makes me feel like she’s parroting things she knows girls are ‘supposed’ to like.'

Gosh, it's almost as if she's learning about 'gender' according to arbitrarily created societal stereotypes, isn't it?

Presumably the parent thinks that one is born with an innate preference for 'girly' things or 'boyish' things?

That doesn’t surprise me at all. They clearly weren’t getting enough attention without transing their toddler too 🙄

What "research"? Still unclear to me. Even the Metro thing says something about "research" but doesn't cite any.

If they know as young as 2 then why do they need puberty blocked to get extra time to work it out?

What 'research' are they talking about? John Money is cited in some tweets, there.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Money

'A 1997 academic study criticized Money's work in many respects, particularly in regard to the involuntary sex-reassignment of the child David Reimer.[4] Reimer committed suicide at 38 and his brother died of an overdose at 34. Some of Money's therapy sessions involved sexual activity between the two brothers.'

Or do they mean some other 'research'?

The fact these parents seemed determined to have a special trans child is not going to be coincidental.

The female parent is trans themselves.

The parents of this child kept asking whether they were a boy or a girl today and one day when the girl said she was a boy today, they took that as some kind of inner gender identity.

The mother of this child is an FTM trans person.