Stonewall have change the word “research”

Good riddance.

#StonewallOut is trending on Twitter now.

Will they keep asking now they’re ‘trans’?

And this is supposed to be the optimal way of bringing up children according to Stonewall? You couldn't make this shit up

Theres not even a definition of what a girl or boy identity is so whatever they say is completely meaningless. How its all got so far when the most basic of terms has yet to be defined is incredible.

If you Google this phrase you will find a useful petition you may like to sign.

'Remove references to 'gender identity' from relationships education guidance'

More Stonewall lies. They lied about the law and got away with it, so now they think they can lie about something we all saw and read by saying we misunderstood it and they didn’t actually say what they patently did say.

They’re so used to talking utter shite wrapped up in arrogant babble, that they’ve lost all self-awareness. Their silly glossary, their redefining of homoSEXuality, their stupid great ‘trans’ umbrella, their incoherent explanations of Gender Ideology - they’re falling apart now and I’m glad. Can’t come a day too soon. They bear no resemblance at all to the previously admirable charity of the same name.

My husband and I took to asking whether she felt like a boy or girl, or neither, to let her know we were listening and keeping tabs on any progression either way.

And this is supposed to be the optimal way of bringing up children according to Stonewall? You couldn't make this shit up 🙄

The wayback machine is your friend here.

@Birdsweepsin

Of course they are. They started losing big public sector clients and went on a push to replace them with more, smaller clients: schools.

Apparently the claim that they haven't been actively targeting pre-school settings isn't strictly true either...

twitter.com/anyabike/status/1551562582489796608?s=20&t=FAmjd7FWF0R4F9pMCD94Ow

Well said!

Yet, many nurseries and schools teach a binary understanding of pre-assigned gender.

In essence, they don’t want adults to yell children they are a girl or a boy.

Are they pretending they mean they don’t want adults to say only boys can play with the cars in the nursery and only girls can play with the dolls?

Are they pretending to believe that at present nursery teachers are telling the children that only men do certain jobs such as be a builder or fireman and only girls can be nurses and teachers?

Well quite. What other ‘adult ideas’ do they want children to be insulated from? Round earth? Vaccines? Gravity?

Yeah no one is buying it.

tired and grumpy raven
@gcraven10
Replying to

@simonjedge
It's the most remarkable motte-and-bailey.

"Two-year-olds can recognise their trans identity."
"WTF?!"
"Look at all these hateful bigots raging about primary schools teaching that some children have two mummies or two daddies. Aren't they awful?"

Indeed. They are perfectly clear about what ideas they don't want adults to be telling children.

After she’d been attending for a few weeks, she said to me again she was a boy. But then she looked troubled and added that her teacher told her she’s a girl, that she’s always a girl.

Mark Jenkinson MP responds:

twitter.com/markjenkinsonmp/status/1551564151826284545

When they say ‘without having adults’ ideas imposed upon them’, they mean the incontrovertible fact that some people are male and some are female, and you can’t change that attribute of your genetic make-up. So they want, instead, children to be indulged in their make-believe, and adults to gaslight them into genuinely believing that they can be a ‘girl’ because they like pink things, and a ‘boy’ tomorrow if they like karate. But that is false, and dangerous, and ideological.

Add remember this, if it can't clearly be explained to you, or words change their meaning depending on the context, how the fuck are they teaching it to children?

God knows how you made sense of my post, with all that daft auto correct!

Just keep plugging away. Write to your MP, write to the charity commission. Stonewall believe that children as young as two can be transgender.

My question is what is the criteria? They don't appear to say so. They include cross dressing fetishists and drag queens as being transgender. So what is the criteria for a two-year-old?

If children in our country are being taught this in schools on the back of Stonewall policy, then it needs to be clear.

Stonewall will be the architects of their own downfall, I have no doubt, whatsoever. All we need to do is keep highlighting what they are saying.

An excellent sign.

Tooooo late stonewall.

You endorsed this:

My husband and I took to asking whether she felt like a boy or girl, or neither, to let her know we were listening and keeping tabs on any progression either way.

I was bathing her one time when the question came up, and she said ‘I’m a boy’.

She went quiet for a moment, looking down at the bubbles deep in thought. Then she looked up again. With a confident smile, she confirmed, ‘I’m a boy today’.

I suspect her teachers don’t think she’s ‘old enough’ for gender nonconformity, despite published research confirming that children as young as two to three recognise their gender, and can identify their own transness.

You believe that children can be trans.

I'm so glad all this is coming to light.

People won't stop there, they will be asking you, what the bloody hell is the criteria that you use to determine if a child is transgender.

Come on let's have it.

Because if it's 'gender nonconformity', let's bloody hear it. Let's hear what you think is gender nonconformity.

This outdated, regressive, sexist claptrap needs highlighting.

It's pathetic, quite desperate really - we simultaneously uphold and condemn gender stereotypes.

we believe that young children should be able to play, explore and learn about who they are, and the world around them, without having adults’ ideas imposed upon them. so leave those kids alone -stop interfering- simple.

Do they really think we're all that stupid??

It was all about 2 mummies and daddies, and letting kids play with what they like, nuthin about trans, all age appropriate, honest guv!

I see they remembered to turn off replies.

"It might mean not forcing children to conform to stereotypes, and it might mean challenging bullying that relates to perceived difference."

But it might mean that??

"We were commenting on an article"

Not citing it as research??

Nice and clear as ever.

That statement makes things worse. What have these stereotypes got to do with trans identity if they believe trans is nothing to do with stereotypes?