Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

I am embracing virtue signalling pronouns in emails

909 replies

MsFogi · 21/07/2022 18:25

I have realised I have made too many assumptions about gender over the years. I had always assumed that Paul (name changed of course) in my company was a man simply on the basis of his appearance (well over 6 foot, well built, big beard, low voice that only someone with an Adam's apple and whose balls have dropped could have). Imagine my relief to find that I have not been misgendering him for over a decade because he has helpfully added his pronouns to his email auto signature - they are he/him/his. There is no company diktat to add pronouns on emails so clearly this is important to Paul or maybe he has been misgendered recently.

So, I thought I would ensure that Paul was not offended on a Teams meeting this afternoon and kicked off the meeting by asking everyone to note that Paul's pronouns are he/him/his and that given that he has stated these that everyone please be sensitive to ensuring that they use them. No one said anything so I think they all took it on board, no one misgendered Paul and I like to think that his move to include his pronouns at work has been embraced in my meeting. Maybe as a result others that attended the meeting will add theirs to their auto signatures too.

OP posts:
Theeyeballsinthesky · 22/07/2022 19:11

Nah the enforced pronouns crowd are the ones doing bullying

“call this biological man a woman!!”

”erm ok if it’ll make them feel ok”

Now give them access to all womens spaces”

”erm hang on they’re a man”

”no they are not!! You are addressing them as she or her are you not?? You clearly agree they’re a woman otherwise why are you using female pronouns. You have no right to keep this woman out of female spaces”

“but….i was only doing it to be kind. Obviously they’re not really a woman….”

”bigot!TERF! Witch”

Conflictedunicorn · 22/07/2022 19:08

But what if someone had misgendered him in the meeting? Would that not have put OP in a difficult position as she knew his preferred pronouns beforehand. She would then have to let him be misgendered, sit through an awkward correction or be accused of encouraging misgendering by not sharing his pronouns. What if someone assumed Paul was a woman?

saraclara · 22/07/2022 19:04

Yet, on the other hand, when a middle aged woman embraces this it is assumed that I am mocking the person with pronouns/am unprofessional to ensure that someone is correctly gendered

But you were mocking him. You know it, and he knows it.
The fact that you were sly and underhand about it doesn't make it any better.

But hey, bullying is totally professional as long as you hide it well so that he can't prove anything.

Conflictedunicorn · 22/07/2022 19:03

I just use my name with my job title underneath. We did have a very junior member of staff who put his whole degree title after his name but usually name and job title is all that is encouraged.

MyrtlethePurpleTurtle · 22/07/2022 19:03

Terfydactyl · 21/07/2022 21:02

So then why are meetings very very often started with the pronoun round?
Why are you asked for your pronouns at many incidences throughout the day.
If you sign up for a course, you are asked, if you want to go to an event where name badges are used, you are asked pronouns. Fucks sake Facebook wanted me to add mine, Facebook, who gives a shit on Facebook?

I feel very left out - no one has ever asked for my pronouns. If they do, my pronoun will be “it”

MyrtlethePurpleTurtle · 22/07/2022 19:01

mrshoho · 21/07/2022 19:15

what's wrong with Mr Alex Woo or Ms Alex Woo? That's what we used to use and worked ok. 🤯

Do people actually sign off emails with the salutation or descriptor of Mr or Ms ?

VestofAbsurdity · 22/07/2022 19:00

It's really not. It's actually one of the nastiest threads I've seen on munsnet, and that's saying something.

It is saying you've not read any threads in AIBU, Style & Beauty, The Dog Kennel or The Cat Litter Tray.

An opinion that it is not funny is just that - an opinion, I find some of the purported hilarious threads in Classics not hilarious so what?

mrshoho · 22/07/2022 18:57

I wish the Two Ronnies were still with us to make a pronoun sketch. Their class system sketch is classic gold.

Ohnohedident · 22/07/2022 18:56

Kanaloa · 21/07/2022 19:07

Nobody is outraged? Unless I’ve missed someone.

But the reason it’s unprofessional is because op knows this is someone who is clearly male, but has gone along with a silly trend (likely because he thinks it makes him appear PC/he is trying not to offend people). It obviously goes against her personal beliefs - which I can understand - so she has made a point of making him look silly in front of a group by pointing out the obvious, that he is male. It’s not a professional attitude for a manager - a manager’s job isn’t to make people look or feel small.

Its unprofessional to bring your religious beliefs to work, to shove down others throats.
He must know in the current climate that putting your pronouns on your work signiture is not a neutral act. It signals support for a very dogmatic and oppressive movement, that is currently hugely fashionable, that is dangerous in my book and he is acting like an oppressor to women who may not buy into this new religion.
He likely knows its putting pressure onto others to show compliance to an idology they may well be indifferent or outright hostile to.

NeverDropYourMooncup · 22/07/2022 18:52

That could be enlightening in some places.

'OK, now we have the operations manager Fred, who is a white middle aged middle class man, speaking'

'Andy, you're the Finance Director and a white middle aged middle class man, what do you think?'

'Steve, as the HR lead and a white middle aged middle class man, what's your take in this?'

'Stuart, how does this impact delivery of the project - oh, I'm so sorry, I forgot, You're a white middleclass and middleaged man - in terms of our target demographics of lower income females of other ethnicities? As a white middle class and middle aged man, what do they want?'

lovelyweathertoday · 22/07/2022 18:46

It's actually one of the nastiest threads I've seen on munsnet, and that's saying something.

Being amused at men announcing they use "he/him" pronouns? In what world is that nasty?

Conflictedunicorn · 22/07/2022 18:40

surreygirl1987 · 22/07/2022 18:39

Yes it is. It’s funny and a very clever way of showing this ridiculous ideology up for the pathetic load of gobbledegook it is

It's really not. It's actually one of the nastiest threads I've seen on munsnet, and that's saying something.

Well there’s a really cool function called hide the thread. That might protect your delicate eyes.

surreygirl1987 · 22/07/2022 18:39

Yes it is. It’s funny and a very clever way of showing this ridiculous ideology up for the pathetic load of gobbledegook it is

It's really not. It's actually one of the nastiest threads I've seen on munsnet, and that's saying something.

Conflictedunicorn · 22/07/2022 18:37

Kanaloa · 22/07/2022 18:36

I don’t mind being called a dreary schoolteacher. Also don’t see this as classic/legend/hilarious/intelligent women’s humour. It’s not actually funny.

Yes it is. It’s funny and a very clever way of showing this ridiculous ideology up for the pathetic load of gobbledegook it is.

Kanaloa · 22/07/2022 18:36

Oestrogelsmuggler · 22/07/2022 15:25

You sound like a really dreary schoolteacher.

I don’t mind being called a dreary schoolteacher. Also don’t see this as classic/legend/hilarious/intelligent women’s humour. It’s not actually funny.

Conflictedunicorn · 22/07/2022 18:25

It’s a bit sad when posters pop on to tell us how awful we are. Are we supposed to care? Is someone telling us we’re being mean supposed to make us grovel in apology and pop off to ‘educate ourselves’ into ‘being better allies’?

MsFogi · 22/07/2022 18:19

secular111 · 22/07/2022 17:21

I've been doing this for a while now.

If I refer to a third person in an email and that person has advertised their pronouns, I always include them in their name.

So for instance;

'Bob Smith (he/him/his) should be able to help you with this query'.

I presumed I was being polite here, to ensure that Bob doesn't get accidentally misgendered, leaving Bob in an emotional state with him unable to complete his days work without resorting to therapy.

Oh that is a great idea - I'll be copying that going forward!

OP posts:
PearlClutch · 22/07/2022 18:15

ArmWrestlingWithChasNDave · 22/07/2022 15:28

It's embarrassing how clever the OP thinks she is.

Is it, aye? Is it cringe?

What else? Any more ad homs to wheel out? Do you realise women here stopped being affected by ostentatiously withering opinions in approximately 1987?

TheBiologyStupid · 22/07/2022 17:55

Babdoc · 21/07/2022 20:54

You really can’t win against transactivists, OP.
Refuse to use pronouns = transphobic.
Use pronouns = workplace bullying.
A woman’s place is in the wrong, as usual.
I can’t wait for this nonsense to die out, whenever people finally rebel against being forced to participate in the gender religion of others.

Absolutely!

Datun · 22/07/2022 17:32

Take "trans" anything out of the equation and look at what this policy actually means in the workplace. It's leaving linguistic traps in conversation and then self-righteously chastising the victims when they walk into the trap you left. It's a totally unacceptable way to treat people. It's toxic, and it's baked into the whole "transinclusive" mindset.

And all to force people to uphold an ideology, even if its against the person's will or best interests.

wellhelloitsme · 22/07/2022 17:21

So Paul (a bloke) is allowed to embrace pronouns yet I (a middle aged woman) am not and if I do a bloke can complain about me doing so?

Yep. Because it isn't enough for us to use compelled language, we are mean and nasty if we don't genuinely believe in that compelled language even if we do use it.

Basically, if you're born with a vagina then you can't win.

secular111 · 22/07/2022 17:21

I've been doing this for a while now.

If I refer to a third person in an email and that person has advertised their pronouns, I always include them in their name.

So for instance;

'Bob Smith (he/him/his) should be able to help you with this query'.

I presumed I was being polite here, to ensure that Bob doesn't get accidentally misgendered, leaving Bob in an emotional state with him unable to complete his days work without resorting to therapy.

PurgatoryOfPotholes · 22/07/2022 17:12

Hey womanittee, I'd like to revisit discussions last night, because I think there is a facet to this that has gone uncommented on, and it's one we need to identify and discuss.

aseriesofstillimages made various posts which I will quote here.

Post 1: The best thing to do depends on the precise circumstances. If an existing member of staff changes their pronouns their manager should ask them how they want it handled - eg whether it should be actively brought to the team’s attention, or if they will just correct people politely if they use the wrong pronoun.

If it’s a case of a new person joining the team, then it’s for that person to decide whether to announce their pronouns when being introduced to people, or just correct them if they assume the wrong pronoun.

Post 2: I don’t think I’ve ever seen that. I’ve seen people correct other people about a colleague’s pronouns if they’ve used the wrong one, but I can’t recall anyone at work just announcing another person’s pronouns for them.

Post 3: You refer to them as they/them, and correct others politely if you hear them using a different pronoun for the person.

So you can't make an announcement of the pronoun changes without consulting the person involved. Right, fine. But you can and should go round correcting junior staff on how to speak, without prior warning. You can set people you manage up to fail, by correcting them on something they had no chance to know about.

You can put people on the backfoot, and make them feel terribly awkward. You can make them worry that they missed an important briefing or email. I mean, they must have, because what kind of workplace goes round correcting people without giving them a chance to get it right first time?

Take "trans" anything out of the equation and look at what this policy actually means in the workplace. It's leaving linguistic traps in conversation and then self-righteously chastising the victims when they walk into the trap you left. It's a totally unacceptable way to treat people. It's toxic, and it's baked into the whole "transinclusive" mindset.

Stop the presses here, but employees without trans identities matter too. Some of them also have mental health issues that could be exacerbated by the behaviour of colleagues and superiors at work.

KatVonlabonk · 22/07/2022 17:08

Ha ha ha ha

Oh you've really ruffled some feathers OP.
It's delicious

I'll be doing this from this point onwards. I feel its only right 😇

Oestrogelsmuggler · 22/07/2022 16:42

I'd say robust mockery of what is utter nonsense is a requirement these days, if this culture is to regain an iota of sanity.