Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Roe vs Wade / gun laws

114 replies

placewherewebelong · 25/06/2022 17:08

I have been reading with horror as the case has unfolded. I personally struggle to see how people can claim to be pro life then subject children to be potential orphans, or in care, or to live with parents who didn't want them, or as the product of a rape, and be so PLEASED with themselves. It horrifies me.

That aside -

why on earth is a country that still has gun laws where children are shot dead and people are encouraged to carry arms deciding that the biggest problem is stopping women from making their own choice about their own child and their own body?

I don't understand :'(

OP posts:
SqueakyShoe · 25/06/2022 18:05

I'm scared that there are peodophiles who want to take advantage when there will have to be a relaxation of adoption laws once juvenile care homes are overrun.

achillestoes · 25/06/2022 17:51

I’ve just come across the argument online (not sure what I think of it) that the shift towards the right on this issue in the US is partly because there is a big group of moderate people who tolerated abortion when it was necessary, but saw it as a necessary evil, and they were being asked to celebrate it within discourses about ‘abortion pride’ and ‘shout your abortion’, and ultimately it made them more pro-life.

I’m seeing comments from people that amount to, I was prepared to accept it, but I wasn’t prepared to accept arguments for unlimited abortion (without mental health or physical grounds, or up to term). Or, I was prepared to tolerate it, but when people were boasting about it it made me feel more hostile. Or, when I saw people saying they’d had twenty abortions and wearing it on a t-shirt it changed my view.

achillestoes · 25/06/2022 17:30

‘Of course it's a logical argument. They continue to allow to people to carry guns when they know the consequence of this is children are murdered.’

Well, I see your point but I don’t agree that that’s the same thing. For it to be directly contradictory, pro gun commentators would have to be arguing against the right to an abortion but arguing for the right to murder kids. They’re not. We don’t win by misrepresenting people’s positions, we just entrench them in them.

‘Why do you think they think people should have a gun?’

I think there are a number of reasons. But so they can murder people isn’t one of them, AFAIK.

placewherewebelong · 25/06/2022 17:29

MrsTerryPratchett · 25/06/2022 17:26

It's not about being pro-life. It's about being anti-woman.

It's all completely clear and obvious.

I find it abhorrent.

For you, or anyone else interested, if you look up Eva O'Connor, it shouldn't be this hard, on facebook - wow.

OP posts:
placewherewebelong · 25/06/2022 17:28

achillestoes · 25/06/2022 17:26

I’m very sympathetic to American women today (I’m strongly pro choice) but I don’t think that’s a logical argument, sorry. The gun lobby isn’t suggesting shooting kids. They don’t say ‘shoot seven year olds but don’t have an abortion’. The position that Americans have a right to carry a gun for self-defence (as mad as I think it is) isn’t inconsistent with a view that abortion is taking a life.

Of course it's a logical argument. They continue to allow to people to carry guns when they know the consequence of this is children are murdered.

Yet these are the same people who are denying abortions on the grounds that someone could use this as contraception or murder.

Why do you think they think people should have a gun?

OP posts:
achillestoes · 25/06/2022 17:26

I’m very sympathetic to American women today (I’m strongly pro choice) but I don’t think that’s a logical argument, sorry. The gun lobby isn’t suggesting shooting kids. They don’t say ‘shoot seven year olds but don’t have an abortion’. The position that Americans have a right to carry a gun for self-defence (as mad as I think it is) isn’t inconsistent with a view that abortion is taking a life.

MagpiePi · 25/06/2022 17:26

I heard a vox pop on the radio of a young American woman rejoicing the Roe v Wade decision saying that 'they' (I think she meant just Americans) have an inalienable, (yes, inalienable) right to certain things. One of those was the right to life and the other was the right to bear arms.
Logical thinking is clearly un-American

MrsTerryPratchett · 25/06/2022 17:26

It's not about being pro-life. It's about being anti-woman.

It's all completely clear and obvious.

MassiveSalad22 · 25/06/2022 17:26

Yep. There is no sense in it.

Roe vs Wade / gun laws
placewherewebelong · 25/06/2022 17:24

But that's the thing. They can believe a foetus is a person all they like, but so were the 7 year old children blasted recently. The irony is strong.

OP posts:
achillestoes · 25/06/2022 17:21

Yes, but their constitution resists action on that. I agree the situation with guns is insane but I don’t think it’s an argument against a person who believes a foetus is a person. We’re not going to convince them that way.

placewherewebelong · 25/06/2022 17:19

But people in America murder children with guns, yet.........

OP posts:
achillestoes · 25/06/2022 17:18

I think we have to accept that, to some people, destruction of a foetus is destruction of a life and they fundamentally believe it’s murder. They’re never, never going to agree with a woman’s right to choose, no matter how many arguments we present. We just have to (in the UK) continue to outnumber them.

Conflictedunicorn · 25/06/2022 17:13

It’s also a country where in 9 states there is no mini age to get married, and there is no federal law against child marriage. Not saying it’s a woman hating, child hating misogynistic country but I’m not not saying that either

Swipe left for the next trending thread