Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Young paying the price for the old?

35 replies

Dahlly · 19/06/2022 08:33

Could the young be identifying as ‘they’ as a protection mechanism against the overtly sexual world that the we have created? And can we really blame them? The Daily Mail has an article today about JLO introducing her daughter Emme, as ‘they’

Emme has a mother who is in her 50s, who is beautiful and extremely sexy. That’s her brand, that’s her day job. She will have seen her mother in hair and make-up everyday. Punishing her body to remain slim.

I can’t imagine growing up in that environment and not feeling completely inferior to this projected image of femininity. Particularly as a young teen.

By the looks of things, Emme now identifies as ‘they’. I think she knows she will never live up to her mothers image, so has removed herself from the ‘competition’ and removed her female self.

I find that so sad but in all honestly, in that position I could easily see myself as a young teen doing the same thing. Is Emme paying the price for her mother’s celebrated beauty? Are young girls using a non-Binary identity to protect themselves from this path?

*This isn’t a comment on JLO personally, her parenting or how she chooses to dress. She seems like a very supportive mother and she is an extremely astute business woman, who wants to promote female empowerment(There is another article today about her request of the female symbol pictogram being rejected for her super bowl performance!).

Article Daily Mail Article. JLO and Emme

OP posts:
WaltzingToWalsingham · 19/06/2022 09:14

@achillestoes I agree. You make some very interesting points!

Dahlly · 19/06/2022 09:12

@KittenKong

In fairness to your point that I’m blaming mothers , that wasn’t my intention at all. It’s society I’m reflecting on.

But to remain fair I will also highlight Emmes father who is now dating a very young, very beautiful and sexy woman. Someone much younger than her mother and actually closer in age to her!

OP posts:
KittenKong · 19/06/2022 09:12

Hands up which of us hated getting boobs and the accompanying gripes and leers?

That would be about all of us wouldn’t it? But imagine being so gullible that believe changing your label to ‘he’ ‘they’ or whatever would protect you more than what we used to do - wear baggy tops and jeans, and sports bras, or dress as a punk/goth and hope it would scare them off.

achillestoes · 19/06/2022 09:09

‘But I’m talking about younger girls- the 11-16 age where this seems to set in. When puberty kicks in and suddenly girls enter a world they didn’t know they were a part of, I mean that of the male gaze . The rejection of ‘she’ might be what they think will protect them from having to be this beautiful, sexy image.’

I think it’s certainly part of it (and why young gay women find ‘shelter’ under the label of ‘trans’ or ‘queer’ or ‘asexual’). But overall I think the engine (the thing that’s driving those young women to be more easily indoctrinated) is that identifying in such a way makes you a better person. It removes you from an elite group (the ‘privileged’) and places you in a group that is so oppressed it’s beyond criticism - what a heady drug for an adolescent!

achillestoes · 19/06/2022 09:06

And to go on, being a female ‘ally’ is the other way to identify out of your privilege. They’re not ‘allies’ so much as handmaidens, and if we use that term thoughtfully, it means ‘servants’. It’s competitive humility in action - look how small I can be, look how little space I can take up. But like every group, that group contains people who twist that ‘allyship’ into another form of the exercise of power: they find people to bully, ‘calling out’ and ‘holding accountable’ people who haven’t joined their self-flagellating group. It’s the best of both worlds for them.

Dahlly · 19/06/2022 09:06

@achillestoes

I don’t disagree.

But I’m talking about younger girls- the 11-16 age where this seems to set in. When puberty kicks in and suddenly girls enter a world they didn’t know they were a part of, I mean that of the male gaze . The rejection of ‘she’ might be what they think will protect them from having to be this beautiful, sexy image.

OP posts:
becausetrampslikeus · 19/06/2022 09:03

I would think it's social media not the occasional mother - I think very few older mothers are as described

Dahlly · 19/06/2022 08:57

@KittenKong

No the opposite. It’s about society celebrating one type of femininity.
I made clear this isn’t a reflection of JLO or her parenting but the world that celebrates/promotes/idealises/fetishises a narrow view of what a woman is. That we all play a part in.

OP posts:
achillestoes · 19/06/2022 08:52

I don’t think it’s that driving this. We’ve always lived in a sexist and sexualised world, and if anything the decades we just lived through were better from that perspective than earlier ones.

I think this is a more an outgrowth of identity politics. Gender ideology affects (more than anyone else) young white middle class females, and has exploded in the last five years (after slower growth over the last decade). Why might that be? Could it be because people (particularly on the hard left - and I am ‘left’) spent the last few years blaming ‘Karens’ for everything and teaching those young white middle class females to internalise a self-hatred based on their own ‘privilege’? Identifying out of that group and into the ‘queer’ community may be a way for them to evade the feelings of guilt and self-hatred that society has inculcated in them. It allows them both to claim the status of ‘oppressed’ and escape the label of ‘oppressor’ (although because they’re thirteen year old kids that’s obviously a label they haven’t earned, it’s certainly a label that’s been placed on them) in a way that assuages their own sense of guilt for not being born into a less privileged group. That also explains why gender ideology is strongest in universities (middle class white kids) and industries where middle class white kids now progress (civil service, unions, politics, publishing, media, law).

KittenKong · 19/06/2022 08:51

I was a kid in the 70s - we had page 3 (which was rude and naughty) but can’t say I was subject to porn, silly reality tv ‘bikini clad babes’, mainstream tv pushing out pretty explicit materials, books in school about sex… it was more sexist than ‘sexy’.

I noticed a difference when I went to a work conference (after being out of the industry for a while) and instead of seeing women in suits, it was like low cut/short shirt, selfie ready faces, lots of pumped up lips/tattooed eyebrows and fancy nails. My young colleagues gossip about reality tv, clothes and makeup, and drag shows.

This kid is a product of current trends. Alway blaming other women/mums eh?