Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Please help stop Queering and TQ+ing LGB people

119 replies

Pluvia · 08/06/2022 08:38

Everywhere I look and listen, I'm noticing that LGB has been replaced by Queer. This review in the Guardian has 'gay' in the title but uses the catch-all 'Queer' and LGBTQ+ much of the time.

www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2022/may/31/young-gay-people-being-out-and-happy-its-revolutionary-meet-the-heartstopper-generation

On Monday Front Row had a feature on Queer Poetry.

www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m00180cy

They didn't bother to define what Queer was, just classified poets such as Rupert Brook (gay) as queer. Rupert Brook would have lived in fear of being publicly identified as being queer, I suspect.

The Q category in LGBTQ+ is mainly straight people. The takeover of LGB by Q is strategic. Like the takeover of 'woman' by transwomen, it's all disappearing the LGB.
Can I ask you, when you hear Queer used in an 'LGB people and people with blue hair who've read Judith Butler at university' way to challenge it. Ask people what they mean by Queer. Ask them whether they realise that in using it to forcibly link LGB people to a group they have nothing in common with, they are oppressing LGB people.

OP posts:
Glitterspy · 08/06/2022 12:10

I’ve heard this view expressed by a male gay colleague. Basically put, “I’m a gay man. Why am I clumped together with all these other identities and presumed to share a community with them?”

luciatrope · 08/06/2022 12:08

Queer is also utterly useless as a label. If I want to read a book from the "queer" section of the library, I'll have no idea if it's a book about a lesbian or a blue-haired straight woman (and even then I won't know if the lesbian really is a woman...)

L, G and B are understandable. They makes sense. The rest of it? No, thank you.

Pebble21uk · 08/06/2022 11:54

I'm a step further on in that I've stopped calling myself 'lesbian' mostly and gone to 'female homosexual' since 'lesbian' is now regarded as a nasty transphobic thing to say (unless you are biologically male, then it's applauded)

Really! Bollocks to that! Utterly ridiculous. Even more reason I'll keep using lesbian then!

LeftFootForward · 08/06/2022 11:44

KittenKong · 08/06/2022 11:41

Or ‘oi dy*e’ maybe?

Isn't that really rude/insulting? I'm no expert though as I'm not a lesbian/gay.

KittenKong · 08/06/2022 11:41

Or ‘oi dy*e’ maybe?

LeftFootForward · 08/06/2022 11:40

As 'queer' has been rebranded from insult to badge of honour to some and others feel the word lesbian is being erased could 'lezza' not be rebranded too as a more upbeat, version of lesbian so the word and femaleness of it is still used?

I really hope this doesn't offend anyone, that's definitely not my intention.

KittenKong · 08/06/2022 11:37

Whoever thunk we’d see a day when gay has been rebadged as ‘boring straight kiddos’

Artichokeleaves · 08/06/2022 11:22

I'm a step further on in that I've stopped calling myself 'lesbian' mostly and gone to 'female homosexual' since 'lesbian' is now regarded as a nasty transphobic thing to say (unless you are biologically male, then it's applauded) and naice female homosexuals call themselves 'queer' which has no overtones of 'I have sexual boundaries and won't sleep with anyone male regardless of their identity'.

It's very sad. More and more people are being forced out of their words, categories, groups and legal protections by this fantastically self centred movement. Who scream 'be kind' and aren't.

Pebble21uk · 08/06/2022 10:49

I'm in my 50s. All through my 20s and 30s I would use 'gay' to describe myself, I didn't like using the word 'lesbian'... I don't know why - possibly internalised homophobia.
For the last however many I will ONLY use 'lesbian' as I feel I am now in a dying breed! And a group whose rights are being eroded before my eyes.

AmbushedByCake · 08/06/2022 10:38

Fond memories of university LGB society marches shouting "we're here, we're queer, we will not disappear."

I remember being very confused in the last year at uni when it became the LGBT society. I never felt like the T issues had anything in common with the LGB issues. Now I feel like they are almost in opposition to one another.

SarahAndQuack · 08/06/2022 10:26

Georgeskitchen · 08/06/2022 10:24

I keep wondering why this word has ceased to become an insult!! Not too many years ago if you called someone the "Q" word you could find yourself in trouble.
I have several gay male friends and all of them.have said they hate the word (perhaps it has been used to abuse and insult them in the past?)

Because, a few decades ago, people (mostly gay men IIRC) started very emphatically trying to take the sting out of it with chants like 'we're here, we're queer'. It's been mentioned on the thread already - surprised it's not common knowledge.

Pluvia · 08/06/2022 10:26

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

This. Yes!

OP posts:
Georgeskitchen · 08/06/2022 10:24

Belovedfool · 08/06/2022 09:11

This is irrelevant but when I were a lass in the 80s, the word queer was used as a sneer, a nasty name.

I keep wondering why this word has ceased to become an insult!! Not too many years ago if you called someone the "Q" word you could find yourself in trouble.
I have several gay male friends and all of them.have said they hate the word (perhaps it has been used to abuse and insult them in the past?)

Pluvia · 08/06/2022 10:22

Artichokeleaves · 08/06/2022 09:23

I hear you.

Stonewall and cronies have turned 'LGBT+' away from 'a highly diverse group of LGB people who just have the one common characteristic of being homosexual uniting them in a shared experience'.

They have turned it, quite intentionally, into meaning 'a group of people of any sexuality who are committed to a certain political belief system'.

Homosexual people have been bounced out. But you'll notice 'gay rights' etc still gets mentioned a lot because that was a useful bit to the cause when they pirated homosexuality and its public/legal support, and broke it up for parts that served them.

And they currently rely on most people still believing they are supporting gay rights instead of realising they're signed up to a highly extremist political belief system that is actively homophobic and working to destroy homosexual and women's recognition in law, while taking over the bits of the provision for them that serves the political belief system.

As we've seen; most people are too busy and distracted and easily taken in by shiny advertising to have realised.

Thank you for this. You've identified the political and commercial overtones that I've been aware of but haven't been able to articulate.

And Sarahandquack, I ask as a lesbian, who sees lesbians less and less represented, who feels the stigma of being a lesbian more strongly now than I did in the 90s, when we were out and proud and 'queer' was an insult, that those of you not directly affected show some solidarity. Your lesbian friend is calling herself queer because she will have picked up the feeling that being queer is more trendy and acceptable than being a lesbian. She may not care, but many of us do. We don't want us, our word, lesbian, erased.

OP posts:
SpinstileTurnstile · 08/06/2022 10:10

Interesting discussion, thank you - which I’ll join in properly when I’m off my crappy little phone.

I agree in most instances the use of ‘queer’ could be replaced with ‘alternative’. I was at university in the 1980s and comedy, music, theatre, dance, our dress and presentation, clubs and pubs, were all ‘alternative’.

Even our politics was ‘alternative’ in the sense of, say, Greenham being female only (unusual) - of course that would never be allowed now; it would be ‘queered’. Which makes me sad.

Anonnnnnnm · 08/06/2022 10:07

Very irritating. Also irritating that gender and sexuality is bundled into one. Gay + Trans is not an automatic association..... one is sexuality, one is gender....

donquixotedelamancha · 08/06/2022 10:06

This is irrelevant but when I were a lass in the 80s, the word queer was used as a sneer, a nasty name.

Same growing up in the 90s and still used as abuse now, to a lesser degree.

I think it's bonkers that a newspaper uses a term of abuse to describe gay people, no matter that some want to reclaim it.

Inamuddle36 · 08/06/2022 10:02

trying to informa myself more about Emily Bridges, I came across this magazine, Diva, “for LGBTQI women and non-binary people”. Such a range of target audience adds to the confusion (for me) as to what all these initials mean.

Please help stop Queering and TQ+ing LGB people
SantiMakesMeLaugh · 08/06/2022 09:48

Well I don’t understand why we would use the word Queer to encompass all LGBTQ+.
it’s such a disparate group with different needs and attitude.

For me, it’s a bit like saying that when one talks about men they mean men and women together. It’s assuming that men and women are the same and have similar needs and issues, which is clearly not the case.
Why doing the same thing with LGBTQ+ Unless of course, one group has decided to be the ‘dominant group’, the reference by which all the other members should be evaluated.

SarahAndQuack · 08/06/2022 09:45

Artichokeleaves · 08/06/2022 09:42

That was a general 'you' Sarah, not you personally.

I was agreeing with you that words are a choice, and cannot be enforced. I think the enforced use of 'cis' often evident on this board is very similar to to pushing of 'queer'.

Whew! I was a bit blindsided there.

LeftFootForward · 08/06/2022 09:43

Belovedfool · 08/06/2022 09:11

This is irrelevant but when I were a lass in the 80s, the word queer was used as a sneer, a nasty name.

Same hear. It makes me wince every time I hear someone use the word.

Artichokeleaves · 08/06/2022 09:42

That was a general 'you' Sarah, not you personally.

I was agreeing with you that words are a choice, and cannot be enforced. I think the enforced use of 'cis' often evident on this board is very similar to to pushing of 'queer'.

SarahAndQuack · 08/06/2022 09:41

Artichokeleaves · 08/06/2022 09:27

Rather like 'cis' isn't it?

If you understand and intentionally want to embrace calling yourself 'cis' you crack on. It's a free country, if you want to embrace and befriend your misogyny to be co dependent with others then that's up to you. But you don't get to call anyone else that label and you particularly don't get to forcibly assign it to those rejecting it and order them to comply.

Because why should you expect to order and insist that someone uses a label they reject while at the same time throwing the mother of all tantrums if that same person uses labels you reject? Like 'biological female' and 'man'?

Other than you're busy trying to divide society into the master race with special rights and powers and entitlements and the servant class who have to shut up and obey you, and frankly no, I'm not enabling anyone in that game. That's plain insane.

But I'm not ordering and insisting anything? I don't know where you get this from.

Like I say, I personally don't use queer; I'm a lesbian, it's fine. But I understand why some people do use it, and to me their reasons seem perfectly sensible.

Artichokeleaves · 08/06/2022 09:40

And rather like 'woman' we now have a very large chunk of the population wandering around going - we had a class definition which was the means by which we organised and had legal rights - they've taken this and made it mean something else to serve their rather selfish personal interests....

wtf are we called now?

This is to me rather like a white modern population deciding to appropriate a racial slur word and embrace it as look at us overcoming oppression.

And it baffles me that I can't name any of those words, because all hell would break loose in how offensive it would be and how unacceptable - rather like now saying 'adult human female' is - but you can call female and homosexual people whatever names and take what you want from them, that's fine.

See how successfully homophobia and misogyny has been normalised and made fun to do?

These people are so stupid . Once you dismantle the protections for any group like this, you have nothing left at all but the hope that you and your mates and loved ones stay in the currently fashionable group. And fashions change. They change constantly. If you can do it to someone else then sooner or later they will do it to you, and it will be too late then to wail about the protections and social beliefs that used to protect you - you were the one that queered and dismantled them.

GCRich · 08/06/2022 09:35

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Swipe left for the next trending thread