If children aren’t being sterilised and rendered sexually dysfunctional because they’re gender diverse, why is it happening then? What IS the reason for children to be given drugs which arrest their sexual development?
Both Matt Walsh and I agree these drugs, leading to lifelong medicalisation, should not be given to children.
Good luck explaining how that is is a “right wing” political opinion akin to a view on corporate tax rates, as opposed to, you know, an opinion based on the premise of first do no harm.
But I’ll say in advance, to emphasise my point from above, I don’t care if you think it IS a “right wing” political opinion to not want to medicalise children, and I don’t care if you think agreeing with Matt Walsh on this makes me some form of right wing apologist. Because I know that it’s just a manufactured stick to try and beat people’s opinions with, and I know where I stand politically. I also know that if you’re trying to persuade people that medicalising children is the good, “left wing” opinion to have, I want no part of that.