Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Breaking: claims that the American Supreme Court will strike down Roe v. Wade

242 replies

PurgatoryOfPotholes · 03/05/2022 02:46

extract from article tonight

Headline:

The Supreme Court has voted to strike down the landmark Roe v. Wade decision, according to an initial draft majority opinion written by Justice Samuel Alito circulated inside the court and obtained by POLITICO.

The draft opinion is a full-throated, unflinching repudiation of the 1973 decision which guaranteed federal constitutional protections of abortion rights and a subsequent 1992 decision – Planned Parenthood v. Casey – that largely maintained the right. “Roe was egregiously wrong from the start,” Alito writes.

“We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled,” he writes in the document, labeled as the “Opinion of the Court.” “It is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people’s elected representatives.”

Deliberations on controversial cases have in the past been fluid. Justices can and sometimes do change their votes as draft opinions circulate and major decisions can be subject to multiple drafts and vote-trading, sometimes until just days before a decision is unveiled. The court’s holding will not be final until it is published, likely in the next two months.

Continues: Article on leaked draft opinion

OP posts:
Thread gallery
14
Xoxoxoxoxoxox · 03/05/2022 06:52

It’s horrific, I never imagined that this would be even an issue in my lifetime.

tabbycatstripy · 03/05/2022 06:51

Just having a look at the Twitter storm now. Guess who the chattering heads want to blame? There we go, it’s ‘white cis women’ again. I see two white women on the court and one of them was nominated by the Democrats. This decision (if it goes through) will be overwhelmingly unpopular and (obviously) particularly so with women, and that includes white women.

Feminism needs to get its act together. If people want to blame white women I America for everything, women are going to lose out, because that means about 100m people are scapegoats for decisions that have no more to do with them than they have to do with everyone else. This is divide and rule, and it’s working against women.

WorkingItOutAsIGo · 03/05/2022 06:49

Honestly when I saw the headline this morning I felt like I had been punched.

US Supreme Court ‘votes to overturn Roe v Wade’

www.thetimes.co.uk/article/9ea3e05a-ca92-11ec-a118-514c2c06bc05?shareToken=e28d4293cf886a53de0b28edf2722ea6

I’ve never posted a share token before but hope this works.

TheWeeDonkey · 03/05/2022 06:48

FannyCann · 03/05/2022 05:53

And of course there is a flurry of talk of "birthing bodies" Hmm

How is a woman having an early abortion a birthing body?

Dehumanising women is how US got to this point.

nepeta · 03/05/2022 06:42

tabbycatstripy · 03/05/2022 06:37

‘Birthing bodies have a right to freedom’ - it’s hardly William Wallace, is it?

It would be hilarious if it wasn't so dehumanising and if there wasn't something very odd about one percent or less of all people affecting language in ways which insults and makes fun of women and girls (roughly half of the country). I mean that what is odd is the power of that tiny minority.

nepeta · 03/05/2022 06:40

It's a draft so not a rumour. But because it's a draft it might still be changed. Unlikely, given that the Republicans now have a super-majority in the court, but not impossible. There are rumours that John Roberts hasn't completely fixed his views yet.

Though I have been expecting this for a while. The effect will be different in different states. Roughly 26 are likely to ban abortion in almost all cases, however.

tabbycatstripy · 03/05/2022 06:37

‘Birthing bodies have a right to freedom’ - it’s hardly William Wallace, is it?

tabbycatstripy · 03/05/2022 06:33

I don’t think it’s just a rumour. Hillary Clinton (and loads of others) have commented on it.

tabbycatstripy · 03/05/2022 06:24

Just awful. In the draft, ‘no such right is implicitly protected by any constitutional protection.’

So no life, liberty or pursuit of happiness for women, then?

ResisterRex · 03/05/2022 06:03

In the Times

US Supreme Court ‘votes to overturn Roe v Wade’

www.thetimes.co.uk/article/9ea3e05a-ca92-11ec-a118-514c2c06bc05?shareToken=cd12a4d34bd86907767d5b0ace8313fd

FannyCann · 03/05/2022 05:53

And of course there is a flurry of talk of "birthing bodies" Hmm

How is a woman having an early abortion a birthing body?

Breaking: claims that the American Supreme Court will strike down Roe v. Wade
FannyCann · 03/05/2022 05:44

Here is a thread from Nancy Pelosi

twitter.com/speakerpelosi/status/1521331795442163714?s=21

Breaking: claims that the American Supreme Court will strike down Roe v. Wade
TheCurrywurstPrion · 03/05/2022 05:44

The direction of travel in the US is alarming and sad in equal measure.

FannyCann · 03/05/2022 05:40

Twitter is awash with it. Utterly shocking.

twitter.com/politico/status/1521288272021901312?s=21

DifficultBloodyWoman · 03/05/2022 03:17

This is terrifying.

I so hope the rumour is wrong.

Pickabearanybear · 03/05/2022 03:15

This reply has been withdrawn

Message from MNHQ: This post has been withdrawn

Mandodari · 03/05/2022 03:03

Scary if it's true.

Swipe left for the next trending thread