‘It’s clear from the daily mail that this only applies if the person is not comfortable with the ‘normal’ terminology and requests something else.’
I know. But aren’t there limits to what you can ask a medical professional to do?
The limit is what the patient requests. As it always is.
Why should they be forced to use degrading terms for the body? What if someone wanted to call the vagina a “penis receptacle”?
They can seek to transfer care to a colleague, just as they would fornany patient they had ethical reasons not to treat. But I suspect this point is a reductio ad absurdam rhetorical point.
Isn’t it better to use accurate terms anyway?
When amongst clinical,staff yes, and this guidance fpdoes nit cover that. In front of the patient then it is better to,p use the terms that the patient is familiar and comfortable with. This is particularly important in diverse areas (and I don't just mean trans by that)
And of course a transman might be pregnant not by choice, and of course they have the right to be pregnant whatever anyone thinks. But do they have the right to control others’ language in this way?
Yes, just like every patient already has