Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Brighton midwives told to say “front hole”

164 replies

tabbycatstripy · 18/04/2022 06:32

Daily Mail reports that a care guide for transgender patients pregnant or giving birth suggests midwives should use ‘alternative’ anatomical terminology, so, instead of calling a vagina a vagina, they could use “genital opening” or “front hole”.

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10727051/Midwives-urged-avoid-using-proper-words-anatomy-avoid-upsetting-trans-patients.html

Aside from the issues of linguistic misunderstanding that might arise when patients are allowed to choose what medical professionals name anatomical parts, isn’t “front hole” simply degrading language? Isn’t it pornified and dehumanising?

OP posts:
tabbycatstripy · 18/04/2022 10:18

‘And if you really really want to request the term ‘wank pillows’ I would support your right to request language you are comfortable with.’

You don’t think asking midwives to use obscene and non-medical terms to describe the human body is disgraceful behaviour? I do, and I support their right to refuse to use any such language. Patients aren’t god. There is a line.

OP posts:
containsnuts · 18/04/2022 10:03

This reminds me of registering DCs for nursery and being asked if there are any special words they use for toileting!

MissLucyEyelesbarrow · 18/04/2022 09:55

@tabbycatstripy

It’s not creepy at all. If my child told me someone touched her I would immediately investigate. I’m not embarrassed about her vagina or vulva. When we used “front bottom” it was developmentally appropriate and she could remember it. I don’t consider that even conceivably creepy.
Because it's confusing and misogynistic. Your bottom is your arse. If you had a son, would you call his genitals his front bottom? Nope - it's just girls' genitals that are so unmentionable that we have to call them something they are not.

A euphemism is one thing - I'm not a huge fan myself, but I understand why parents don't want a loud commentary on "Why is my vagina/penis itchy, Mummy?" in the check out queue. But a euphemism designed to gloss over the fact that girls have genitals is wrong IME, and sets girls up for a lifetime of embarrassment and difficulty describing sexual organs.

ColinRobinsonsFart · 18/04/2022 09:50

Is the penis the 'piss stick' or 'piss pole'.... oh I think I have found my new MN name....

Vimto1991 · 18/04/2022 09:47

@MintyMoocow

I have three holes myself, my vagina is the middle one, pushing a baby out of the front one REALLY doesn’t bear thinking about.!
😂😂 that was my first thought, too.
Whatwouldscullydo · 18/04/2022 09:46

Yes, all of the doctors in the NHS downed tools for months in order to write this. There is no one employed in the NHS whose job it is to write policy. The NHS can only do one thing at any one time

Everyone has a bad nhs story. Sometimes multiple. Everyone. Every spare penny amd every spare minute by Everyone there should he spent trying to improve things . Improve outcomes. Patiente experiences. Not spent paying lobby groups with no medical, legal, safeguarding, child development backgrounds to alter paperwork amd policies so it males no medical, or anatomical sense.

Identity is no ones issue but patients. Its not relevant to anyone else. And should not require staff lie to or become less clear to, patients. Truth not lies. Not fantasy.

SushiShopSearch · 18/04/2022 09:40

@Queenoftheashes If you’re a pregnant man I doubt someone referring to your vag is the most triggering thing to happen to it. How do they reconcile the baby coming out of it?

Please do not ever say this. It's a lie.

SapphosRock · 18/04/2022 09:38

I'm going to move.

Can anyone recommend a place that's as cool as Brighton that doesn't have this nonsense going on?

turbonerd · 18/04/2022 09:38

It is in a medical setting.
To request language you are comfortable with could be deadly.
Besides; midwives might be well affronted to refer to the lips of labia as «wank pillows». I wouldnt support any such idiocy.
Childbirth is very dangerous business and to mess around with fucking preferred language that could (WOULD) result in misunderstandings and delays is a recipe for disaster.
It is a matter of life and death to put it bluntly.

Fucking language and thought police are clearly lunatics when they prioritise «preferred language» over safe delivery and survival of both mother and child.

It makes me so angry.

godmum56 · 18/04/2022 09:36

I know midwives through a family member. Along with most other clinical professionals they have been taking their cue for anatomical naming from their patients for many many years. If there is confusion they will make sure that they understand what the patient is saying and vice versa.

thinkingaboutLangCleg · 18/04/2022 09:33

@tabbycatstripy

It is disgusting. It’s all about a utilitarian “meat suit” view of the body, with the body degraded and the “gendered essence” elevated. This, in spite of the fact that there is no gendered essence, and we need to do everything we can to avoid the degradation of the person, because so many people do treat women as if they are “front holes”.

Let’s not indulge it!

Exactly. I find expressions like ‘front hole’ both juvenile and obscene. As well as ignorant of course, given that the vagina is the middle ‘hole’.

Another poster made the link with pornography, which makes a lot of sense. Our own needs (eg to urinate) are irrelevant. So we are just two holes, both available for a penis to enter.

Branleuse · 18/04/2022 09:32

As much as these are stupid terms imo, Brighton is very pro trans, so its specifically talking about providing sensitive healthcare to transgender patients, so I think its a bit of a non story. If they were going to use those terms for all women then that would be grim. I think that in the event of childbirth it really should be focussed on the birthing female regardless of their feelings about their identity, and care of people in such intimate settings should be trauma informed

Ijustreallywantacat · 18/04/2022 09:31

Of all the things to focus on. Not staffing. Not increased bad outcomes fir black women. Not birth injuries. But worrying about indulging fantasies?

Yes, all of the doctors in the NHS downed tools for months in order to write this. There is no one employed in the NHS whose job it is to write policy. The NHS can only do one thing at any one time.

Ijustreallywantacat · 18/04/2022 09:29

It says SOME people and IF they prefer. Vagina will still be the go-to. You’re not going to hear it unless you specifically request it. It’s dramatics anyway. I know several trans men and I can’t imagine any of them actually wanting to use the term ‘front hole’. And if you really really want to request the term ‘wank pillows’ I would support your right to request language you are comfortable with.

Whatwouldscullydo · 18/04/2022 09:26

Having sex and getting pregnant, the most female thing in the world to do, isn't triggering but using the word vagina is?

The sooner staff realise they are being played amd stop pandering to this utter nonsense the better.

Of all the things to focus on. Not staffing. Not increased bad outcomes fir black women. Not birth injuries. But worrying about indulging fantasies ?

Anything medical.should be factual, truthful etc ir informed consent cannot be achieved.

The answer should just be no. We are not doing this. Your identity matters to you amd only you its not my job or anyone else's job here to be a part of it.

Madamecastafiore · 18/04/2022 09:25

Only women can give birth, all this bollocks needs to stop now.

MrMrsJones · 18/04/2022 09:19

Technically the "front hole" is where women pee, the "middle hole" is where the baby comes out and "back hole" is for feces

iheartmybeachhut · 18/04/2022 09:19

What complete and utter bollocks, it's called a vagina, always has been always will be ffs, get over it!

ResisterRex · 18/04/2022 09:18

So if there were two people to whom this might have applied - and we don't know they would have objected or wanted these words - and one of those two has since desisted, and if that was as of Feb 2017, then how many people is this for now that it's April 2022?

And as someone said, what's the end point? Because we've been here before with Brighton. Since then we've been told half of our maternity services is not safe for women and babies. What's the point in this then?

To brush it away as a bit mad or benign is tempting but I think people need to be held to account for this. Or perhaps they could tell us how they're so much better and more safe for women and babies that they're at the point where they can do these activities as well? I'm sure every other maternity service in the whole country could learn, right??

tabbycatstripy · 18/04/2022 09:14

It’s not creepy at all. If my child told me someone touched her I would immediately investigate. I’m not embarrassed about her vagina or vulva. When we used “front bottom” it was developmentally appropriate and she could remember it. I don’t consider that even conceivably creepy.

OP posts:
QuinkWashable · 18/04/2022 09:10

It's creepy because it's using euphemisms in order to deal with an adult's embarrassment about their sexual function.

A child has no idea about the sexual function (nor should they), they just want to know the name of it.

Plus, it can be exploited so that a child can't clearly articulate that they are being abused. 'the man touched my flower' sounds innocent, but if the man also told the child that her vulva was called her flower then clearly it isn't.

tabbycatstripy · 18/04/2022 09:07

MissLucyEyelesbarrow

It’s not creepy to use a euphemism with a small child. Why would that be “creepy”?

OP posts:
QuinkWashable · 18/04/2022 09:05

Front hole just makes me want to wrinkle up my nose...

  1. it's the middle
  2. there's nothing wrong with the word 'Vagina'
  3. If you can't use the words, are you really ready for a baby?

I mean, christ, the conversations I've had with my kids - some have definitely required a deep breath before (While I plan quite how to answer a 5 year old who asked how the baby got in my belly), and a stiff scotch after (when 9 year old learned about neutering cats and why, and asked if 'dad did that to me') - we've spent enough time blaming women for not teaching their kids the correct words for their anatomy on MN, I feel like we should at least be requiring it of adults too!

MissLucyEyelesbarrow · 18/04/2022 09:03

@Fulmine

“Front hole” is language taken from a pornified view of the world in which the vagina is something you put things in.

You're way overthinking this. "Front hole" is simply child terminology, no more, no less.

Front bottom is creepily twee child terminology. Front hole is not.
Neverreturntoathread · 18/04/2022 08:58

@Alltheprettyseahorses

Putting aside any other issues, it's the MIDDLE hole fgs! A midwife trying to deliver a baby from the front hole wouldn't have qualified.
🤣 The world needs more people like you 👏