Will India Willoughby need to delete this post?

Yes indeed

Apologies for bad link....here's another www.tiktok.com/search?q=emwozya&t=1650742902013

Has anyone come across an Emily Wozya? They have been sprouting a lot nasty crap on tiktok and someone has screen shot a lot of there posts. .......www.tiktok.com/?feed_mode=v2&is_copy_url=1&is_from_webapp=v1&q=emwozya&t=1650742902013

And just like that,the tweet has vanished.

If it went to court India can defend a claim of defamation by proving their statement is true. So India would have to prove that it was more likely than not that the baroness had made up the story. I imagine this would be quite difficult.

Peeing in full view of everyone? Isn't that what the, erm, men do at urinals. Carry on India, if you feel more comfortable peeing like a man, go for it.

Did I miss the history lesson on Suffragettes where they 'peeing/stripping off in full view of everyone' to get us the vote? Thanks IW, my brain is now making that film

I am not a lawyer, so I may be wrong, but I was under the impression that in England and Wales you had to prove that what you were saying was true to defend a libel action, not that that the person suing you had to prove you were lying?

Suppose it went to court. (IW seems to harbour fantasies of self-martyrdom for the cause, so maybe it’s conceivable.)

Would the Baroness be able to prove it untrue without publicly revealing information that needs to be kept private? Could relevant evidence be kept confidential?

Or maybe she could just wait till things are public and then sue the ? How does it work?

*I know she doesn’t like swearing, hence asterisks.

Men often claim that women lie about rape.

Did they pick that pearl out of a catalogue as well?

I do believe they have mixed up suffragette with insufferable…

[quote EmpressaurusWitchDoesntBurn]Does everyone know where Willoughby got the horse idea from? Suffragette Emily Wilding Davison threw herself under the King’s horse at a race on Derby Day in 1913.

www.museumoflondon.org.uk/discover/malignant-suffragette-remembering-emily-wilding-davison[/quote]
Oh India is a suffragette according to India.

I really really hope she finds herself an expensive lawyer to send Willoughby a warning letter. She doesn't actually need to sue, just threaten to sue, because Willoughby's tweet is so obviously libellous - there is no grey area, no room for saying "I meant something different". It's absolutely stark. That should result in an apology - as happened when that TRA had to apologise for lying that JKR ignored child abuse images.

Ok, thanks.

Is that definite, Athena? I haven’t been able to find her tweet where she said she was mistaken, so I also haven’t seen any follow up.

Most recent comments I'm aware of from Gilly are in this article here, which covers the whole saga.

UK: Women Recount Staff Denying there were Men in Single-Sex Hospital Spaces

“The more I’ve become involved in and aware of this issue, I am incredibly skeptical of my own judgment being ‘confirmed’ as incorrect,” she tweeted on March 19.

“I also started to doubt whether or not the hospital had been truthful because I’d been made aware of the NHS Pledge and a clause known as Annex B. I’d heard how they were covering up and protecting trans rights over women’s and the woman’s rape was the final straw which led me to open up again.”

Is that definite, Athena? I haven’t been able to find her tweet where she said she was mistaken, so I also haven’t seen any follow up.

Does everyone know where Willoughby got the horse idea from? Suffragette Emily Wilding Davison threw herself under the King’s horse at a race on Derby Day in 1913.

www.museumoflondon.org.uk/discover/malignant-suffragette-remembering-emily-wilding-davison

@tabbycatstripy India also joked (I think and hope it was a joke) about throwing themselves under a horse at the Grand National in protest

Because the horse and his/her rights don’t matter a shit either. Just a tool for Willoughby’s more important entitled existence.

Can someone clarify the Baronesses here?
Nicholson and/or Norman? Or am I not up to speed?

Someone needs some quiet time to think about their actions….

And I hope the Baroness takes legal action.

Its an interesting mindset. The first and immediate concern seems always not that a woman appears to have been hurt, but that it is obviously a maliciously manufactured attempt to harm the tweeter.