Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Single sex spaces

233 replies

Notcreativeatall · 07/04/2022 09:42

Genuine question here
is the support for single sex spaces - and not allowing trans people in on their chosen sex rather than their biological sex - different if the trans people were narrowly defined- ie would people think it acceptable to allow someone who has had all the surgery etc access to a female only space? A lot of the arguments is against having male-bodied people in however they self identify- but if someone has fully transitioned are they arguably no longer a threat?

OP posts:
LK1972 · 07/04/2022 15:49

Thanks, timeis, I totally appreciate that many gender-neutral toilets may be perfectly acceptable to the majority, ie full length walls, wash basins etc, but still not to all women. The gender-neutral options offered as addition, not replacement, seems a reasonable way forward. I felt incredibly uncomfortable waiting in the queue in gender-neutral space, as it was just me and some random bloke, and there was no other option. Don't think that's acceptable really, as I have hyper-vigilance towards men, like many many other women, due to my 'lived experience'.

trishaplateypus · 07/04/2022 15:37

@Thelnebriati

No. If you let some men in you make it impossible to keep any men out.
Zero tolerance is what's needed, it's the only way to keep women and children safe from harm.

No biological males allowed in female safe spaces.

timeisnotaline · 07/04/2022 15:32

@Artichokeleaves

in the situation there isn’t it takes into consideration the distress it would cause a transwoman to use the men’s,

But fails to take into consideration the distress it would cause potentially several females in that space to have to leave and go without any access to anything so that the TW doesn't have to feel distressed.

Sexist as fuck.

Females are told by the trans lobby that if they choose to self exclude from the women's provision because males are choosing to use it due to their gender identity that's their problem. I'm afraid I therefore fail to see why male people self excluding from the male provision deserve greater sympathy and consideration than the lobby shows to females. Either everyone's distress matters equally or no one's does.

Or are we really in the position of trying to work out how many females in distress outweigh one distressed male?

That is exactly the position we are in and always have been, legally. That’s where the ‘proportional’ part comes in. (Screenshot for explanation of proportion, the example itself in the screenshot is a different one)
Single sex spaces
Thelnebriati · 07/04/2022 14:53

No. If you let some men in you make it impossible to keep any men out.

AlisonDonut · 07/04/2022 14:52

@Notcreativeatall what say you about my rights, the schoolgirls's rights andy colleague's rights?

You seem to be a tad quiet on my conundrum.

Whatwouldscullydo · 07/04/2022 14:51

If there are female toilets there are male toilets. Impact is non existent beyond a male being told no and that's something toddlers and dogs can handle so adult males should understand easily.

Artichokeleaves · 07/04/2022 14:38

in the situation there isn’t it takes into consideration the distress it would cause a transwoman to use the men’s,

But fails to take into consideration the distress it would cause potentially several females in that space to have to leave and go without any access to anything so that the TW doesn't have to feel distressed.

Sexist as fuck.

Females are told by the trans lobby that if they choose to self exclude from the women's provision because males are choosing to use it due to their gender identity that's their problem. I'm afraid I therefore fail to see why male people self excluding from the male provision deserve greater sympathy and consideration than the lobby shows to females. Either everyone's distress matters equally or no one's does.

Or are we really in the position of trying to work out how many females in distress outweigh one distressed male?

GeneLovesJezebel · 07/04/2022 14:37

A man is a man no matter what he thinks he is or does to himself. Males should not be in female spaces.

Abra1d1 · 07/04/2022 14:34

@timeisnotaline

Respectable sounds like the vicar’s son in the 18th century Grin
I'd rather have him around me than Grace!
timeisnotaline · 07/04/2022 14:31

@LK1972

I don't even care if it's a fetish or not anymore, I've run out of fucks to give. The law has been clarified. No men in women's spaces if women object. I object to men in every single space I feel vulnerable, loos included, and intend to communicate it clearly and persistently, in writing, to every service provider allowing this, cc'ing my MP and Kemi Badenoch. I'm sure some helpful legal feminist organisation will have templates soon enough, separate for private providers and public services like NHS!
It is not at all clear that the law has specified this with regard to toilets. Someone on Twitter (but a real someone, I just forget who!) has posted a great breakdown of the guidance and reasonable interpretations, and in the women’s toilets example you still have to demonstrate impact on the transwoman- so if there’s a gender neutral toilet also the impact is minimal, in the situation there isn’t it takes into consideration the distress it would cause a transwoman to use the men’s, and the relative privacy afforded by individual cubicles in the toilet block, and it sounded to me like it would often conclude that it is reasonable for our hypothetical transwoman to use the women’s. I’m just saying… don’t shoot the messenger. Personally it is not the hill I’m planning to die on, it is the most marginal of the many common situations as as others say, 10 years ago I wouldn’t have questioned it, not because I was ‘kind’ but because it predated all these nutty extreme views where rational thought has been left as roadkill, so we only knew/knew of trans people as normal people, not extremists trying to erase women and destroy lives.
timeisnotaline · 07/04/2022 14:21

Respectable sounds like the vicar’s son in the 18th century Grin

Abra1d1 · 07/04/2022 13:27

@timeisnotaline

Not respectable! Respectful, as in of women and people in general. Ie a perfectly normal person.
Respectable is a good word to use here, too!
Artichokeleaves · 07/04/2022 13:23

Not👏one👏more👏assault👏on👏a👏woman👏or👏girl

That. Absolutely that.

Artichokeleaves · 07/04/2022 13:21

The political lobby have made it very clear there cannot be a rule for one and not for another based on surgery: as they ask, often, who is going to do genital checks on the door of every female space?

And the answer will be from many male people, the same one as male people have often told women here: I don't care about your boundaries, if I want to use that space I will.

The only answer is to return to legally gatekept spaces in law, and provide extra provision for trans people. They cannot have (and by doing so remove and destroy) female spaces.

Beardyblokesbegone · 07/04/2022 13:19

@LK1972

I don't even care if it's a fetish or not anymore, I've run out of fucks to give. The law has been clarified. No men in women's spaces if women object. I object to men in every single space I feel vulnerable, loos included, and intend to communicate it clearly and persistently, in writing, to every service provider allowing this, cc'ing my MP and Kemi Badenoch. I'm sure some helpful legal feminist organisation will have templates soon enough, separate for private providers and public services like NHS!
The sooner they're out of our spaces the better.

Not👏one👏more👏assault👏on👏a👏woman👏or👏girl

PrelateChuckles · 07/04/2022 13:17

I don't want to set arbitrary rules to allow or deny transwomen into single sex spaces for women. I especially don't want the bar to be surgery.
The default is and should be segregation by sex where appropriate with unisex facilities if it's not an issue, or as well as - such as toilets and changing rooms.
Whilst I might on a personal level feel ok with a trans friend in my spaces, I don't speak for everyone. They're not my rights to give away.

I agree with this. Wherever you draw the line, there will be people very close to it who will argue it should be bent for them. TRAs are even doing this with actual biological sex, ffs - claiming that various chromosome disorders means that man or woman isn't "fully" male or female.

Stick to your sex. Join the campaign against male violence if that's the issue for you.

LK1972 · 07/04/2022 13:13

I don't even care if it's a fetish or not anymore, I've run out of fucks to give. The law has been clarified. No men in women's spaces if women object. I object to men in every single space I feel vulnerable, loos included, and intend to communicate it clearly and persistently, in writing, to every service provider allowing this, cc'ing my MP and Kemi Badenoch. I'm sure some helpful legal feminist organisation will have templates soon enough, separate for private providers and public services like NHS!

Beamur · 07/04/2022 13:12

I don't want to set arbitrary rules to allow or deny transwomen into single sex spaces for women. I especially don't want the bar to be surgery.
The default is and should be segregation by sex where appropriate with unisex facilities if it's not an issue, or as well as - such as toilets and changing rooms.
Whilst I might on a personal level feel ok with a trans friend in my spaces, I don't speak for everyone. They're not my rights to give away.

Beardyblokesbegone · 07/04/2022 13:07

i would challenge any guy who entered a female toilet - but not Annie - wwyd?

If "Annie" cared for the safety of women and girls he'd use the men's facilities - he doesn't sound like someone I'd be friends with.

Beardyblokesbegone · 07/04/2022 13:04

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk guidelines.

AlisonDonut · 07/04/2022 13:03

I worked with an Annie.

He was about a foot taller than every other woman in that workplace. And taller than most of the other men. He had a physical job and was head of a department.

He had not had any surgery and was quite open about how his consultations and progress was going.

He came into work one day when he had a days leave, to look at a report. He had gingham rara skirt, hair in plaits with gingham ties, white stockings and a frilly neckline. He still had his penis. We were an open site with school tours almost every day.

How do you square this off?

Should he be using the site toilets which school girls also used? What about when dressed as Little Bo Peep on a day off? Where do you even start trying to unpick the suitability of a staff member turning up on a day off dressed like this? Is it a kink, is it a fetish or did he genuinely think he was Little Bo Peep? Or should he be allowed to wear what he wants?

Personally i had to sit there with him as he looked through the report. I felt so uncomfortable that words could not explain. Why should i be made to feel this at work?

Whose rights trump whose?

Me as a staff member, the school girls, or him?

I can guarantee no woman i have ever worked with, has ever dressed up as nursery rhyme character and come into work. So why should he be allowed to just because he wants to?

Beardyblokesbegone · 07/04/2022 13:01

Absolutely no biological males in the changing rooms, for the safety, privacy and dignity of women and girls.

It's a hill I'm willing to die on.

bellinisurge · 07/04/2022 12:58

A castrated man is still physically stronger than a woman.

Artichokeleaves · 07/04/2022 12:57

i would challenge any guy who entered a female toilet - but not Annie - wwyd?

There is a hell of a lot of 'not my Nigel' going on in this debate as a whole.

It doesn't matter how lovely your friend is OP. They do not have the right to compel other females to participate in the fiction that they are female, nor to exclude females from having any facility in order to take their preferred choice of facilities. The whole problem has been, there is no way to say yes to Annie, and no to Karen White. There isn't. It's been tried, the GRA is a compromise.

What is needed is third mixed sex spaces. Annie can use those, not have to use male sex based provision if they would prefer not to, and I'm sure you and other members of the group would use them too. Plenty of women will. The thing is, Annie is not more important than the females who need single sex to mean single sex.

And the wobbly boundaries have led to the horrors of women being raped. Individual emotive cases can't be a part of this any more .

LK1972 · 07/04/2022 12:53

Because of new EHRC guidance, I intend to challenge any infringement of female space from now on. So you need to prepare yourself for that situation - Annie will feel betrayed if you don't stand up for her 'rights', you'll lose her as a friend anyway. Would it not be better for the group to start thinking how to explain to Annie that her understanding of the law was incorrect, and she has no right to use female spaces. That would be true friendship in my opinion, but as someone v clever wrote 'it's much harder to stand up to your friends than your enemies' (sorry for bastardized quite).