Whether or not one agrees with Graham's tone isn't the point here: he was doxed and harassed by the very people that, lacking any insight, consider themselves victims. Adrian Harrop, as the entire world now knows and as any new employer will see the moment they research him, was suspended for one month (which is precisely what the GMC asked for) for abusing me and three others. He was not "defending trans rights", but rather, being a deeply abusive individual who thought it normal to dox, threaten, and cyberstalk (which is stalking). He has no recourse to complain when anyone states this since it is quite clearly spelt out in the GMC determination.
This behaviour does impact upon one's personal relationships and we don't always act in ideal ways (what is the ideal way when you are plunged into insanity?). My wife, for example, was frightened when our address was posted on-line (I was just angry since I consider the abusive personality disordered not especially bright man who did it an absolute joke). After she died, the same TRAs had / have the gall to post that she was a victim of "domestic abuse" - the only people that abused her were TRAs and certain "friends" who saw her as a prop to use in their campaign against "Terfs" (and by extension me).
I completely understand his anger. Of course, we should introspect upon our own responses (I could have been less reactive dealing with some things but then the invasion of my life was / is extreme and there's no "script" for when abusers abuse). It's clearly much more nuanced than "Graham lost the plot" or "TRAs are 100% to blame", but he certainly has legitimate complaint about what has been taken from him. I see nothing incorrect in the DM article. If others do, they might contemplate suing.
Again.