Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Dr Michael Webberley

366 replies

DomesticatedZombie · 11/03/2022 13:39

  • haven't had a chance to keep an eye on his tribunal, but from what I'm reading:

'Dr Michael Webberley applied for voluntary erasure from the GMC register. The Tribunal say it is "unfortunate" that was not determined prior to the hearing today.

MW had two requests for postponement declined & has now provided new medical evidence for an adjournment'

twitter.com/tribunaltweets2

OP posts:
WeBuiltCisCityOnSexistRoles · 19/05/2022 17:26

"My heart and soul goes out to my husband. While he was in hospital today having a big operation, he was sent the damning list of proven allegations that the GMC have found against him.
'He hasn’t been able to tell his side of the story and he wasn’t able to be represented or to ask experts who truly understand the needs of trans people.
'I know that he has helped so many trans people, and I know that you will wish him well in his retirement. He has served the NHS for a long and hard career.
'His patients have always loved him, as I do"

I literally have no words for this...

Mumsnut · 19/05/2022 16:56

The Daily Mail has just led on this (can’t link from phone)

hrey are pulling no punches.

TheBiologyStupid · 19/05/2022 00:32

MrsOvertonsWindow · 18/05/2022 18:46

The tribunal found Michael Webberley's failure to provide good clinical care for patients related to consultations, history taking, examination, diagnosis, prescribing, delegated communication, follow up, assessment, working within the limits of his expertise and the guidance.

Patient consent forms contained information that was untrue and informed consent was not obtained. Michael Webberley failed to establish an adequate Multi-Disciplinary Team. The tribunal also found his actions were dishonest.

Terrible and shameful treatment of vulnerable children. I wonder how many individuals and groups who have referred children or celebrated this doctor in any way will apologise? tumbleweed-

Christ, I'm not sure I can think of any aspects of a GP's clinical care provision that isn't on that list!

IcakethereforeIam · 19/05/2022 00:08

All the supportive comments, some from former patients. Reminds me of when Shipman was arrested and everyone saying what a good Doctor he was.

MagnoliaTaint · 18/05/2022 23:05

vivariumvivariumsvivaria · 18/05/2022 22:08

I don't understand why Dr Mr W has been found to be dishonest, but Dr Mrs W was not in her own hearing...but that she and Gender GP was found to be involved in this.

Am looking forward to someone clever translating it all for me.

Some of the charges related to Dr H as she was part of GenderGP at the time. The findings for Dr H have been arrived at but no decision yet on what the consequences will be for Dr H (nor for Dr M).

Does that help? I'm certainly no expert, but that's my understanding.

PronounssheRa · 18/05/2022 22:12

omahanebraska · 18/05/2022 21:15

His wife is DARVOing over on twitter right now

I bet she is

vivariumvivariumsvivaria · 18/05/2022 22:08

I don't understand why Dr Mr W has been found to be dishonest, but Dr Mrs W was not in her own hearing...but that she and Gender GP was found to be involved in this.

Am looking forward to someone clever translating it all for me.

BoreOfWhabylon · 18/05/2022 22:02

Good. Will be interesting to see if this is picked up by the press.

MrsOvertonsWindow · 18/05/2022 21:48

It does suggest there's some hope that the medical profession is not totally captured? It also chimes in with some of the revelations in the interim report from the Cass review in terms of failure to provide good clinical care for children.

SpindleInTheWind · 18/05/2022 21:44

omahanebraska · 18/05/2022 21:15

His wife is DARVOing over on twitter right now

Yeah that'll fix everything, ranting on Twitter in full public glare

omahanebraska · 18/05/2022 21:15

His wife is DARVOing over on twitter right now

Imnotavetbut · 18/05/2022 18:56

Paragraphs are most definitely not showing up for me, it's since the upgrade 🤨

Yes, dishonestly and Doctors don't mix well. The determination is, as always, very thorough. As much as I'd like them just to throw the book at these people and find everything proven, it does look like a just and fair process. I'd hate that job (the minutiae of detail would drive me crackers) but I'm pleased that we do have people with the skills and patience to wade through the evidence as they have.

SpindleInTheWind · 18/05/2022 18:51

There were a number of allegations of dishonesty.

Allegations 83- 88 concerning facts on operation of Gender GP & the involvement of suspended Gender GP, Dr Helen Webberley were found proven.

I think this is interesting in terms of what happens with HW's case. Dishonesty in doctors is taken very seriously indeed.

MrsOvertonsWindow · 18/05/2022 18:46

The tribunal found Michael Webberley's failure to provide good clinical care for patients related to consultations, history taking, examination, diagnosis, prescribing, delegated communication, follow up, assessment, working within the limits of his expertise and the guidance.

Patient consent forms contained information that was untrue and informed consent was not obtained. Michael Webberley failed to establish an adequate Multi-Disciplinary Team. The tribunal also found his actions were dishonest.

Terrible and shameful treatment of vulnerable children. I wonder how many individuals and groups who have referred children or celebrated this doctor in any way will apologise? tumbleweed-

FlibbertyGiblets · 18/05/2022 18:41

Imnotavetbut · 18/05/2022 18:36

For the love of all things good Mumsnet, what is going on with paragraphs!,

Paras are fine for me

Thank you for the update. 'failed to provide good clinical care to patients and was dishonest.' cripes.

Iknowitisheresomewhere · 18/05/2022 18:40

Very heartening to see the large number of watchful doctors out there that spotted something wasn’t right and made the referrals.

IcakethereforeIam · 18/05/2022 18:40

Sorry, thank you !

IcakethereforeIam · 18/05/2022 18:39

I'm on an android tablet, your paragraphs are showing @Imnotavetbut

Imnotavetbut · 18/05/2022 18:39

Screenshot

Dr Michael Webberley
Imnotavetbut · 18/05/2022 18:36

For the love of all things good Mumsnet, what is going on with paragraphs!,

Imnotavetbut · 18/05/2022 18:36

From Tribunal Tweets:

The medical practitioners tribunal has found that Dr Michael Webberley, who ran an online clinic prescribing testosterone to men in the UK and Gender GP, an online transgender clinic, failed to provide good clinical care to patients and was dishonest.

Some allegations were found not proved, on the balance of probabilities, the civil standard of proof used by the tribunal.

The decision has detailed consideration of the law and expert evidence and each element of the allegations and is 305 pages long.

The tribunal found Michael Webberley's failure to provide good clinical care for patients related to consultations, history taking, examination, diagnosis, prescribing, delegated communication, follow up, assessment, working within the limits of his expertise and the guidance.

Patient consent forms contained information that was untrue and informed consent was not obtained. Michael Webberley failed to establish an adequate Multi-Disciplinary Team. The tribunal also found his actions were dishonest.

The tribunal will now consider if Michael Webberley's fitness to practise as a doctor is impaired.

Sanctions may be imposed to protect the public, maintain public confidence in the medical profession and proper professional standards and conduct for the members

The tribunal will continue (dates tba) with evidence of Michael Webberley's fitness to practice.

It can place conditions on the doctor's registration, suspend registration or erase the doctor’s name from the medical register, so he can no longer practise.

There were a number of allegations of dishonesty.

Allegations 83- 88 concerning facts on operation of Gender GP & the involvement of suspended Gender GP, Dr Helen Webberley were found proven.

Allegation 89 on dishonesty related to use of the Gender GP name was found not proved.

Imnotavetbut · 18/05/2022 18:31

drive.google.com/file/d/1Xsv8zghhgvbzCSZADpaFGeTxgMemS9hq/view

Not sure if that will work. It's a beast of a document (again).

Imnotavetbut · 18/05/2022 18:30

I'm working through the determination now (bloody hate these things, so long!). Short summary: lots found proved, some not proved. They have found him to be dishonest. There will be a further hearing to determine what sanction, if any, will be imposed. As I said, very short summary!

BitterAndOnlySlightlyTwisted · 18/05/2022 17:39

I’m on an iPad, so when I get the sign up/log in prompt I press “sign up” (as I don’t have a Twitter account) this takes me to a new window which I am able to close and can then view to my heart’s content. Hope this help you non-Mac peeps

Swipe left for the next trending thread