Exulansic has reduced following?

Alix Aharon of the GenderMapper Project is a confounded of Partners for Ethical Care along with John Uhler, who worked as a psychotherapist with sex offenders for many years. I would recommend this website.

Rather the issues some people are alleging in relation to Genspect. I have no idea if there is a basis for them or not. It does no harm for parents to have choices either way.

Thank you both Linearxxxxcc and ATeamAmy. Interesting to discover other discussions. Yes, you are quite right. Odysee is the alternative platform to Youtube.

I came across a reference to an organisation which was a resource for people/children who are affected by this gender identity . It was referenced as someone said that it could be useful for people who have reservations around Genspect. I have no idea if it is any good, or without the issues some people are pointing out in relation to Genspect. Maybe someone will highlight if there are any issues. They are called 'Partners for Ethical Care'.

www.partnersforethicalcare.com

It must be awful for people who suffer the disbenefits of this ideology, or having it damaging their families. I am so grateful there are only real natural scientists in my family and they don't appear susceptible to influence by the latest beliefs being promulgated by social 'science'.

She read out the letter. It was perfectly reasonable. Alix is nuts.

Crikey, poor Alix. I'll go and watch that now.

Alix (Gender Mapper) is speaking live to A Slightly Twisted Female now, about her experience of receiving what she describes as a "threatening" email from a particular Genspect person about her lack of public support for them.

Sorry, been busy all weekend. @Cailleach1, is it Odysee you are thinking of as the Youtube alternative? Gettr is the Twitter alternative. Gender Mapper isn't on Odysee as far as I can tell.

Just to be clear, it was only GM's last video that was taken down. Her other videos (such as they are) are still there.

Here's her website. It's a really worthy project.

www.gendermapper.org

by the not byte
creator not crematorium obv
My auto fill is set to a foreign language!

Cailleach1

Hi , I'm a bit surprised that you aren't aware of the gendermapper but let me fill you in she's amazing!

She actually does at least 2 projects: gendermapper itself, which tracks down all gender affirming clinics which prescribe cross sex hormones and or surgeries and plots them on an interactive map (Web site is gendermapper followed by dot org) and onlyenemies which is looking into the problems caused byte porn industry. I think you find onlyenemies by going to the relevant youtube channel of the crematorium Alix Aharon.

ATeamAmy, not Any!

You're all made of stern stuff listening to a video advocating the removal of gonads in youngsters. I wonder if 'Claire Feminist' is going to do a video on that? Mind you, maybe medical surgery is in a territory way beyond safeguarding. It is into the Wild West and would possibly attract censure hitherto avoided.

Still of a mind that I have no preference to any particular platform, and I'd as happily watch someone on something else as on Youtube.

I must admit I don't know who 'Gender Mapper is'. However , I am curious due to the mention of 'Gender Mapper' in the post and so may wish to check it out for myself. To avoid any confusion (or in case of deletion), I'd better quote from ATeamAny's post of 18th March at 23:11hrs. I had quoted it in my query anyway.

The reason most women get involved is the protection of women and girls and their safety and dignity, I would have thought. I can't think of a single woman who has been vocal about this and not suffered as a result. Not so the men. Even the worst treatment meted out to vocal men pales in comparison to that suffered by women.

Gender Mapper's heartfelt video was mass reported. A woman who spends her time trying to stop gender clinics maiming children was mass reported by (I assume) the same crowd that supports Genspect.

Then my query:

Is that on Gettr, do you know?

I guess that answers op's original question about media. I'd just as happily watch someone on Gettr as Youtube.

FIN

Sorry I messed up a bit there, the hearing test aspect is outlined and justified on her gettr stream. I read them concurrently and got mixed up.

I will be sure to watch that episode Langclegsinspace.

Anyway, sorry to go off topic, by returning to the original topic, but Exulansic is putting out some increasingly wild content on her substack. You need to register but not pay to read two essays she's written on CAIS. The most troubling aspects are 1her repetition of calling for mass testing of "female-appearing" babies so we can spot the ones who are really "boys". It's a bit incoherent but something about hearing tests to detect MRKH (an XX condition) and a long explanation which basically says that, not only are CAIS women not women, but MRKH women, being "incompletely" formed women are therefore "incompletely" women. Like I say, it's confusing, but any insights greatfully received. I think it's disgraceful and wholly not the point of GC feminism to demand that the class of women refers only to those women without disorders of their reproductive system. I mean I can hardly take this on board, I'm not going to say what this reminds me of. 2I've forgotten, but there was another issue that troubled me. Will come back to that.

I see. It doesn't seem the obvious choice. There are plenty of alternatives to You Tube. I would have assumed there was a file size limit for gettr that wouldn't stretch to accommodate e.g. Karen's 3+ hour-long recordings.

Why would it be on gettr, out of interest?

Is that on Gettr, do you know?

No, it was on YouTube and got taken down I think.

I guess that answers op's original question about media. I'd just as happily watch someone on Gettr as Youtube.

I just listened to the latest wider lens podcast in which Anne Lawrence advocated for adolescent boys to castrate themselves because it's difficult to access puberty blockers without medical help. Apparently if they change their minds they can just take testosterone later on and everything will be fine.

There was a disclaimer at the start but it was more focused on protecting psychotherapy than it was on protecting children.

They don't even age restrict these videos.

This kind of stuff needs to be kept FAR AWAY from any organisation advocating for parents, families or children.

On the subject of GC we are being mocked and forced into identifying as GC now by Karen. She is on the higher plane along with Ex, Jennifer Bilek and Joey etc in being "Pro-Reality" as if we never have been. I've never asked fir the GC moniker, it just evolved from a vacuum. Pro reality, although correct would leave most people non the wiser about child butchery.

I watched her video as I got a notification. Why on earth was it reported?

The reason most women get involved is the protection of women and girls and their safety and dignity, I would have thought. I can't think of a single woman who has been vocal about this and not suffered as a result. Not so the men. Even the worst treatment meted out to vocal men pales in comparison to that suffered by women.

Gender Mapper's heartfelt video was mass reported. A woman who spends her time trying to stop gender clinics maiming children was mass reported by (I assume) the same crowd that supports Genspect.

The Gender Critical Movement™ has always felt like a forced teaming exercise to me.

I recognise that there are all sorts of groups of people who have an issue with the gender agenda and with self ID but their issues are not necessarily the same as mine.

My issues are women and girls' rights and safeguarding. That's it.