Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

How trans activists in publishing hijacked a children's book competition to pursue a personal vendetta

212 replies

PurgatoryOfPotholes · 25/02/2022 04:51

The Phoenix Book Award is an initiative to encourage reading amongst children of the borough of Lambeth, London, launched in 2007. Back in 2017, it described itself as This exciting South London based Book Prize targets Year 5, 6, 7 and 8 pupils in Lambeth, encouraging them to read through the transition years. Phoenix is a unique book prize as students are involved in every stage of the award; from picking the shortlist, to shadowing the award and then finally voting for their favourite. It is open to all schools in the Lambeth area.

This year it's "judged by children from Years 6, 7 & 8 in Lambeth."

Children at participating schools read the books from a long-list (a very long list: as many as 32 books!) over a period of months, and whittle it down to from there. It sounds like an absolutely amazing concept for generating enthusiasm about reading.

Let's hear from the adults who do the paperwork for it:
After a break due to the pandemic we are delighted to announce that the Lambeth #PhoenixBookAward is returning for 2022!

This year, children were asked to nominate books that helped them get through lockdown. The result is a fantastic, diverse, and hugely competetive shortlist.

twitter.com/LambethPhoenix/status/1496789801718059011?s=20&t=F1f0NO5YFo712FQS40-3-w

Sounds lovely, right?

Yesterday, the twitter account for the prize posted the shortlist:

Boy in the Tower by Polly Ho-Yen
When Life Gives You Mangoes by Kereen Getten
The Wolf Wilder by Katherine Rundell
The Boy at the Back of the Class by Onjali Q. Raúf

twitter.com/LambethPhoenix/status/1496791630476722184?s=20&t=aQmwjEpxiId-FatE21miAw

(Now another round of voting begins, and we'll know the winner on the 12th May 2022!)

This was accompanied by a little graphic showing the shortlist.

And that's where this wonderful heartwarming story of children enjoying reading went wrong.

One author's publishing agent took issue with the children of Lambeth having shortlisted another author with whom she disagreed, and decided to falsify that graphic to remove any record that Onjali Raúf and her book The Boy at the Back of the Class had been shortlisted by the children of Lambeth. Then she tweeted her false version from the business twitter of the literary agency she runs, for other people to unknowingly circulate.

You're probably wondering how we can know this. Well, we know, because she boasted about doing exactly that from her personal twitter account.

Transcript for those using a screenreader

Tweet 1 from Agent: Am I petty enough and procrastinating enough to amend a shortlist image to take out the shortlisted terf. Probably.

Tweet 2 from Agent: Turns out I am.

If you go here, you can read the incredible thread from Gillian Philip explaining this mess in more detail. Gillian's the one who explained events in the first place.

twitter.com/Gillian_Philip/status/1496907435830919172?s=20&t=aQmwjEpxiId-FatE21miAw

If you are struggling to view twitter threads without an account, go here. Graham Linehan has made a version of the thread that you can scroll through without a twitter account.
grahamlinehan.substack.com/p/there-will-always-be-women-who-hate?utm_source=url

Here are some other things you should know: Onjali Raúf founded an organisation that campaigns to end modern slavery and trafficking. makingherstory.org.uk/contact/

She also founded O's Refugee Aid Team which supports refugees in Calais; in fact, 50% of the royalties from that shortlisted book, The Boy at the Back of the Class go to their projects to support refugees! Yep, this is the same book that agent is trying to suppress positive publicity for.

www.osrefugeeaidteam.org/

This is a thread of some of the books Onjali Raúf has published: twitter.com/Dora_Callisto/status/1496988662806032386?s=20&t=aQmwjEpxiId-FatE21miAw which is where I found out that children are involved in the awards process.

At this point, I can only echo Dora's thread and ask, how do you think you'd feel if you were a child who'd nominated The Boy at the Back of the Class as one of the "books that helped [you] get through lockdown"? How would you feel to find out that another shortlisted nominee's agent had edited your nomination out?

It's despicable behaviour.

How trans activists in publishing hijacked a children's book competition to pursue a personal vendetta
How trans activists in publishing hijacked a children's book competition to pursue a personal vendetta
OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
FedUpWithBriiiiick · 25/02/2022 09:02

Bought a copy in solidarity with Onjali. I'm sure DS will enjoy reading it!

The arrogance and downright rudeness is staggering.

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · 25/02/2022 09:01

@MoonOnASpoon

Still it’s breathtakingly appalling behaviour like this that helps to draw back the curtain. Gender ideology in general uses “intersectionality” as a shield and is supposedly all over BLM, but it’s only to serve the purposes of trying to seize the moral high ground. Actually it doesn’t give a crap about anyone who’s dealing with actual oppression, because it’s all about trying to grab the “most oppressed” prize from them. And it’s privileged people who are the worst for this because they want to feel morally pure instead of feeling bad for being white, rich and western.

Alice S-H lays this all out on a plate. I hope more people see it and wake up.

www.feministcurrent.com/2018/03/23/leftist-women-uk-refuse-accept-labours-attempts-silence-critiques-gender-identity/

Link to Feminist Current article from four years ago which includes (near the end) an account of how Goldsmiths students tried to derail the Deptford People's Project. Similar points made. So depressing.

spacehardware · 25/02/2022 08:53

"Are people really that lacking in self-awareness??"

Oh yes they really really are

Will be buying a copy of Boy at the back of the class right now

PatsArrow · 25/02/2022 08:51

I know the children themselves vote for the winner if this prize, but I REALLY hope the award organisers are aware of this. If ASHawes client won the award it would send a very bad message after her doing this.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 25/02/2022 08:49

Gender ideology in general uses “intersectionality” as a shield and is supposedly all over BLM, but it’s only to serve the purposes of trying to seize the moral high ground. Actually it doesn’t give a crap about anyone who’s dealing with actual oppression, because it’s all about trying to grab the “most oppressed” prize from them. And it’s privileged people who are the worst for this because they want to feel morally pure instead of feeling bad for being white, rich and western.

This.

RufustheFloralmissingreindeer · 25/02/2022 08:45

Utterly reprehensible from start to finish; & she thoroughly deserves to suffer reputational damage for being so utterly unprofessional. How could any author trust her to represent them when she pulls stunts like this?

Yep

DameHelena · 25/02/2022 08:43

Jesus Christ.
Does anyone know if Onjali Raúf's publisher or Kereen Getten's have made any comment?

RufustheFloralmissingreindeer · 25/02/2022 08:43

Its 99p on kindle

So ive bought it

And theyeve got an offer for two paperbacks for £7

So ive bought them

Dreadful situation, thank you for bringing to my attention purgatory

NotBadConsidering · 25/02/2022 08:42

Just posting my utter shock at this despicable behaviour.

bishophaha · 25/02/2022 08:33

A TRA being a proudly dishonest bully? Shocked, I tell you.

(It's grim, and thanks for the thread)

FrancescaContini · 25/02/2022 08:29

I’m really shocked to read about this. My children are too old for the book but I shall be ordering a couple of copies anyway out of solidarity for the author. Thank you for bringing this to our attention.

MoonOnASpoon · 25/02/2022 08:28

Also something that’s interesting is that although some writers have been cancelled / dumped in various ways for having t*rfy views, a whole lot more haven’t. That’s because publishing, especially big, corporate publishing, cares more about the bottom line as well as about other initiatives like promoting more black and Asian writers, and understands the importance of having a wide reader base. It’s smaller, newer, younger, more right-on publishers and agents who are more likely to push trans ideology and cancel authors (and Alice s-h is a very young, new agency).

AuxArmesCitoyens · 25/02/2022 08:27

I'm not in the UK

Clymene · 25/02/2022 08:22

Can we not use the term bipoc please? This is the U.K., not the US

Beefcurtains79 · 25/02/2022 08:22

I can’t believe the author joined in, it’s repulsive behaviour and she should be removed from the shortlist.
Bullies shouldn’t get awards, otherwise what does that teach the children?

cocoapopfan · 25/02/2022 08:19

Onjali Raif has been targeted before, when she was chosen for something by Booktrust. A bunch of children’s authors were openly boasting on twitter about how they were trying to get Booktrust to fire her.

There was also some kind of fall out because a children’s author who wasn’t even GC, but had congratulated Rauf or liked one of her tweets or similar was then hounded off twitter.

Horrible behaviour.

AuxArmesCitoyens · 25/02/2022 08:11

This is despicable. I'm on the fringes of the industry and it's setting up BIPOC initiatives left right and centre. Get this shows how shallow it all is.

MoonOnASpoon · 25/02/2022 08:09

Still it’s breathtakingly appalling behaviour like this that helps to draw back the curtain. Gender ideology in general uses “intersectionality” as a shield and is supposedly all over BLM, but it’s only to serve the purposes of trying to seize the moral high ground. Actually it doesn’t give a crap about anyone who’s dealing with actual oppression, because it’s all about trying to grab the “most oppressed” prize from them. And it’s privileged people who are the worst for this because they want to feel morally pure instead of feeling bad for being white, rich and western.

Alice S-H lays this all out on a plate. I hope more people see it and wake up.

MoonOnASpoon · 25/02/2022 07:50

I’m in this industry and have been following this. It’s so telling of how this ideology convinces people they are right and morally superior on the basis of no evidence, that someone as insignificant as Alice can not only do this to the great and garlanded Onjali Rauf, but publicly snigger and invite an audience for her bullying. How deluded can you get. And the author egging her on. Nastily, childish school bullies.

I hope her author’s book gets withdrawn from the shortlist over this. It’s totally not on.

Though OP if anyone thinks children’s publishing is heartwarming and cosy, it’s not. It’s dog-eat-dog!

Theeyeballsinthesky · 25/02/2022 07:46

“Am I petty and procrastinating enough?””

No I think what you mean is “am I enough of a cunt?” to deliberately target a Muslim woman writing about child refugees

Just breathtakingly awful behaviour from a deeply privileged white woman lacking in even the tiniest level of self awareness

Still I expect it went down a storm in the hyper we’re sooo woke literary circles she moves in

How trans activists in publishing hijacked a children's book competition to pursue a personal vendetta
Helleofabore · 25/02/2022 07:30

Thank you purgatory for starting this thread. What an amazing woman Onjali is.

And thank you necessary for the transcript.

Killermontstreet · 25/02/2022 07:26

This is pretty shocking - also that another author happily cheered her on. And people say cancel culture doesn't exist.

JellySaurus · 25/02/2022 07:21

Alice is despicable.

And illiterate.

Carriemac · 25/02/2022 07:16

I've just bought her book . Alice is despicable.

NecessaryScene · 25/02/2022 07:15

Here is Onjali Rauf speaking at WPUK. This was the Brighton Labour conference event from 2019, so you can here the crazed hate mob outside hammering on the windows throughout her speech.

Even aside from the issue, the basic behaviour here makes clear which side I want to be on.

I just knocked up a partial transcript.

As a woman of faith, whose God, may I please remind everyone, is genderless, I have zero problems with anyone who is anything other than me. if you're a man who feels more comfortable in stepping out of the socially-constructed he-man-esque box that is "man" to make a home in a socially-constructed box of "woman" then go for it. I have absolutely no problem with that.

But please, please, please, don't do so to invade a space that women are still fighting for. [applause] Feel free to create your own space - a third space, a fourth space, a seventh space. One in which caters for you and your unique experiences and needs, because those won't be shared by us either. Or better yet take, that space from the men -they've got loads! [laughter + applause]

And please don't pretend that my own experiences of transforming from a girl to woman, and all the millions of tiny hurts and digs and pains and prejudices and push backs that we as women suffer daily as a result of being those two words - girl or woman - can be shared by you either, because you were born with certain privileges.

Whether it's toilets or changing rooms, specialist services in a refuge, school toilets or prison cells, it's vital that woman's uniqueness, lives and wants be as respected as you want your uniqueness, lives and wants to be respected.

As someone working with women fleeing domestic violence and wars, human trafficking rings, childhood sexual abuse and million-and-one other experiences of male-inflicted violence in-between, our underfunded drastically-reducing single-sex spaces are literally our last vestiges of safety.

For women who have been literally punched, beaten, raped and broken at every possible level you can possibly conceive, to be forced to accept a former man as part of the healing process will, to put it bluntly, lead to further trauma or worse still a distrust of the services that were placed there to help them in the first place. [applause]

Swipe left for the next trending thread