Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

School trip policies on overnight accommodation for trans children

740 replies

foodfiend · 24/01/2022 09:18

Short version:
School's policy appears to be something long the lines that trans girls can share with girls if the girls are OK with it. Dd (14) is proposing sharing a room with trans girl friend and another girl. We have said we're not happy about this. Dd says that's transphobic.

Long time lurker here - would welcome any relevant experience, especially from any secondary teachers. School trip is this spring, planned since Oct - they've now been asked to submit room share preferences - rooms of 3. Dd is friendly with a trans girl - (since before name change ~ 2 years ago). Dd says A told her that the teacher had told A that they could share with whoever they want 'as long as everyone was OK with it'. (I have now checked with the teacher, and this appears to be correct.) Dd and another girl have agreed to share with A.

DH and I both said, hang on, A is male. It is not appropriate for you to be sleeping in mixed sex bedrooms. Dd says A is not male and we are transphobic.

To be clear - the kid seems perfectly nice and I think this scenario would probably be fine. (No idea what the other girl or her parents think.) But a policy of 'yeah, sure, mixed sex sleeping arrangements are fine if everyone agrees to it' sounds like a disaster waiting to happen. And it's unclear whether I'd even know it was happening if I didn't happen to already know that A is trans.

I'm pissed off at being put in this position of having to be the one to point out that this is inappropriate and put a target on my head as 'hateful', or seeming to specifically reject A/A's identity. While Dd professes to be happy/keen on this, it's clear that it would be extremely difficult for a girl in a similar position to say that she wouldn't be happy to share - she'd be terrified of being accused of transphobia. And it seems pretty crummy for A as well to be asked to go round her friends and put them on the spot like this.

It seems like the school is relying on the kids to somehow work it out for them. And that no-one seems to have spotted the obvious risks of setting such a precedent. Will they be equally happy for a trans boy to go in with two boys next time around? Or other male and female students to choose to share mixed bedrooms?

Are any other parents and teachers able to share policies or approaches from their schools?

OP posts:
oldwomanwhoruns · 24/01/2022 20:10

OP - check online that the LEA toolkit which has been quoted to you in still current, and has not been withdrawn. Google it! Other LEAs have been forced to withdraw that nonsense as being unlawful.

Get onto your LEA, threaten legal action if they do not withdraw this unlawful document...

DdraigGoch · 24/01/2022 20:07

Sex is no guarantee of additional safety, but established friendships which are viewed to be good ones by the adults that know the teenagers are probably more likely to be a protective factor.

@suggestionsplease1 have you taken leave of your senses? Sex is the key factor in whether an accidental pregnancy is a risk.

Artichokeleaves · 24/01/2022 20:07

Safeguarding:

'case by case' - how do they propose to deal with a situation where they have female children who are keen to have their male friend in their room, and other female children who will not be able to come on the trip if the sleeping accommodation is mixed sex?

What will they do when a clearly unsafe, unsuitable male child wishes to use the precedent already set? Because it will be nearly impossible to say no without it being personal and discriminatory.

How exactly do they intend to justify that this male child is different to the other male children that are absolutely not allowed under any circumstances to sleep with female children? Because when they have a female child who has been harmed by this, they'd better have a watertight reason.

Policy by Stonewall is, frankly, that no one and nothing matters but the child of interest to Stonewall. Stonewall et al merely shrug when women are harmed in the pursuit of providing male people with access to female spaces, they do not care . And that tells you everything you need to know about how subhuman and inferior they regard females of all ages. These policies are not balanced, they are not responsible, they are oblivious to the realities of safeguarding or duty of care equally to all children, and are incompatible with law as has been pointed out many times.

The school are insane if they do not envisage what could go wrong and what will happen when it does. And if it is not in them to care about the children, then perhaps they may care about their own careers and imagine themselves at the wrong end of a serious case review and the national press.

Although again, parents should be aware, from bitter experience, it is likely that much effort and pressure will go into concealing anything that does go wrong. This political lobby is not responsible about that either. They are not a body to place trust in.

BernadetteRostankowskiWolowitz · 24/01/2022 20:06

@Helleofabore

I would also say that Baroness Nicholson would probably love to hear about this safeguarding decision by your LEA and your school.
Absolutely
Helleofabore · 24/01/2022 20:04

I would also say that Baroness Nicholson would probably love to hear about this safeguarding decision by your LEA and your school.

Sexnotgender · 24/01/2022 20:03

Oh god, your 14 year old is writing you a letter to educate you 😂 I bet you can’t wait.

I’m utterly baffled at the number of adults who seem to lose all ability to think critically around this matter.

Deliriumoftheendless · 24/01/2022 20:00

How on earth can a school be expected to make decisions on a case by case basis?

How are they expecting to decide who gets to share with girls and who doesn’t without opening a massive can of worms about student’s identities? Are they going to advise parents why their trans child can’t share with opposite sex pupils but another trans child can? How is that workable? Because they’re allowing 14 year old to be ultimately responsible? How is that going to work?

RestingPandaFace · 24/01/2022 19:58

I think when talking to a teen you’ve got go facts, there’s so much pressure to believe and conform you need to take emotion out. I’d go through these with a highlighter and talk to her about the balance of risks.

committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/18973/pdf/

www.bbc.co.uk/bbcthree/article/b41fb362-6615-4e9b-950e-36859358e023

Goatsaregreat · 24/01/2022 19:51

OP,
Take a look at Safe Schools Alliance. They have lots of advice on talking to schools and one of them posts on here @Twofalls is their name I think. They have lots of resources about speaking to schools and safeguarding is what they do. Here's a link to their factsheet on single sex changing:
safeschoolsallianceuk.net/resources-2/factsheets/#Single_Sex_Toilets_and_Changing_Facilities_factsheet

BernadetteRostankowskiWolowitz · 24/01/2022 19:50

I'd check in with dd that she will read a counter letter from you in response to hers and be prepared to "be educated" by it

foodfiend · 24/01/2022 19:37

Oh, thanks @Goatsaregreat, that's good advice for my conversation. I am proud of her - she's a good friend, and she's willing to stand up for what she thinks is right. (This is why I think girls like her are so at risk here - even if she was worried about such an arrangement, she wouldn't admit it because she'd want to be a good ally.)

In fairness, I don't know yet what's been said in school. (Waiting for my letter/lecture after dinner). But if we've said no, there isn't any way that the school can avoid revealing that to the children, even if dd were to claim she didn't know. (I think all her friends have been told at great length all weekend about how awful I am.)

OP posts:
foodfiend · 24/01/2022 19:32

I know there are some smart folk on here who know about safeguarding, so would really value some pointers here. It strikes me that while this has been forwarded by the safeguarding lead as their justification for this approach this is very much NOT a safeguarding policy. The only reference to safeguarding in the whole document is this:

"There are no issues under child protection or safeguarding law or practice specific to trans children and young people aside from what is in place to keep all children and young people safe. For example, there is nothing that would prohibit trans children and young people using the changing rooms or toilets which reflect their gender identity."

What does a safeguarding policy look like?

OP posts:
Goatsaregreat · 24/01/2022 19:30

Just seen your last post - that's what a captured school look like. And what the future is for girls with their needs and rights being at the bottom of the pile.
I'd definitely ask for the complaints procedure and follow it up. Expecting 14 year olds to make decisions about mixed sex sleeping is plain wrong. They want it, then they allocate it and face the consequences. It abdicating professional responsibility.

Goatsaregreat · 24/01/2022 19:27

So sorry to hear that OP. This is a direct result of the school's actions. In addition to forcing the decision onto children they have again avoided all responsibility and are now discussing your discussions with the school with children.
I'd make an urgent appointment with the Head to lay out a formal complaint:

  1. The failure to safeguard children by implementing mixed sex sleeping and putting the onus on girls to acquiesce to demands to share bedrooms / bathrooms.
  2. Why has your discussion with staff about safeguarding been shared with the children?

Ask for their complaints procedure as the leaking of your safeguarding concerns to children is outrageous, inappropriate, breaches confidentially and potentially dangerous.

Re your daughter - I'd just reassure her that you know she's a lovely caring young women, reiterate that your proud of her for caring about others but reinforce that as an adult you see the big picture and why she might be happy to agree to sharing, girls should not be put in the position of having to agree to this. These need to be adult decisions. And then agree to disagree.

foodfiend · 24/01/2022 19:24

Convo with deputy head was pretty awful. She's clarified that they would have informed us and got our approval, but that the policy is to deal with everything case by case. I've pointed out that this is terribly unfair on everyone, forcing us to look like we're make some kind of judgement about this individual child, which we're absolutely not, and feels awful. She says they're following the LEA guidance on safeguarding, and sent me a link to the Local authority's Transgender inclusion toolkit. This has a huge great 'Stonewall approved' stamp on the front. I'm not going to post it here because outing, but here's what it says about residential trips:

"As far as possible, trans pupils should be able to sleep in dorms according to their gender identity. Some trans children and young people may not feel comfortable doing this and in such cases alternative sleeping and living arrangements should be made."

That's it. There is nothing, literally nothing, about how any other children might feel about this, what risks might arise from such an approach, or how to handle parents, children from religious minorities where single sex is particularly important. Nothing. The only question the guidance prompts schools to ask is 'What does the trans young person want?'

So, I guess I should just be relieved that the school are going as far as to ensure the children and parents are happy with any arrangement, right?

OP posts:
foodfiend · 24/01/2022 19:16

@Goatsaregreat Well, it's one thing to speak out here. I'm now dealing with the consequences of saying 'hang about' which is that dd (and presumably her friends) now all think I'm a horrific transphobe. I'm feeling pretty crushed and not very happy to challenge at all. dd is preparing a letter to educate me.

(Interestingly, I'm the target of the letter - DH is off the hook. Seems like the same rules apply as in the outside world. Everything is women's fault for not being nice enough. )

OP posts:
Goatsaregreat · 24/01/2022 17:57

So pleased to see so many adults speaking out - especially parents and teachers. People are waking up to what's being done to children in the name of "inclusion" and it's great to see everyone happy to challenge and not being intimidated.

BlackAlys · 24/01/2022 17:50

The job of any safeguarding lead and Health and Safety Officer is to minimise risk.

On school trips particularly, by law, every school must adhere to stringent risk assessment policies and those responsible need to consider every possible risk and put measures in place to prevent these where possible.

Can a male impregnant a female abs have life changing consequences particularly for the female? Yes. Hence we have single sex provisions.

Ask for their Impact Assessment.

Theeyeballsinthesky · 24/01/2022 17:17

Yes Ploppy! I find the idea that girls should accommodate gay boys as “honorary girls” because the straight boys are bullying them as all kinds of wrong! I mean what lessons are we teaching with that?

That girls are support humans for boys
Tjat boys can bully without consequence
That a boy sexually attracted to other boys is somehow a girl?
I mean ffs!

tellmewhentheLangshiplandscoz · 24/01/2022 17:17

@gogohm

Whether it's ok does vary depending on circumstances. On choir tour we had a gay lad and he shared with his best friend, a straight girl, they were 15 and parents were consulted - they both had slept over at my house before then too, he was one of the girls! I was a bit uncomfortable but it was just as awkward with him sharing with one of the lads as they were uncomfortable and there wasn't money in the budget for spare rooms so they had singles. It's a case of is this appropriate for this very specific friendship group and remember youngsters are not as concerned about sex and gender as adults are, they are friends
Nope, friendship groups are irrelevant to safeguarding.

And even if they were, we all know how fickle they can be!

Artichokeleaves · 24/01/2022 17:00

@Feelingoktoday

As a young teen many years ago I shared many camping trips with girls and was never “touched up”. One sleep over with a male friend and his sister and i was. This pair were my best friends. I never told my parents. He took advantage of the situation. Just one occasion that’s all it took.
Flowers I am sorry.

As we've seen from the experiment on female prisoners in prisons; when something inevitably goes wrong and women are sexually assaulted and raped, the political lobby merely shrug and argue it's only a female hurt, it's not like it matters.

Which illustrates the core issue here: that other people have rights too.

Ploppy1322 · 24/01/2022 16:49

@gogohm

Whether it's ok does vary depending on circumstances. On choir tour we had a gay lad and he shared with his best friend, a straight girl, they were 15 and parents were consulted - they both had slept over at my house before then too, he was one of the girls! I was a bit uncomfortable but it was just as awkward with him sharing with one of the lads as they were uncomfortable and there wasn't money in the budget for spare rooms so they had singles. It's a case of is this appropriate for this very specific friendship group and remember youngsters are not as concerned about sex and gender as adults are, they are friends
No it really doesn't depend on the circumstances, it depends on the biology. WTF is going wrong at that school that a gay lad doesn't feel comfortable with the boys, bloody well sorting that out should be where the attention is focused!
Feelingoktoday · 24/01/2022 16:39

As a young teen many years ago I shared many camping trips with girls and was never “touched up”. One sleep over with a male friend and his sister and i was. This pair were my best friends. I never told my parents. He took advantage of the situation. Just one occasion that’s all it took.

FacebookPhotos · 24/01/2022 16:29

I would just put my foot down and tell my child that there will be no sleeping arrangements that could result in pregnancy.

Completely this. I don't have DC, but I am a teacher. Although it hasn't come up yet on any of my school trips, this is the line I would use to say a blanket "no" to supervising any such trip.

That said, the latest iteration of keeping children safe in education explicitly includes peer-on-peer abuse, points out that girls are more likely to be victims and boys more likely to be perpetrators, and requires school staff to minimise the risk of it happening. I'd seriously worry about the competence of any safeguarding lead who would permit mixed sex sleeping arrangements on a school trip.

Whatwouldscullydo · 24/01/2022 16:28

Trans children should absolutely be able to have different provision to the others of their sex if they wish: this is the respecting of their identity and meeting their need. They are not an exemption to safeguarding

I'm.torn about this tbh

We go on about having their identity etc respected then elevate them to a status others can only dream of. I'm.sure even child would love a private room and private shower etc all this extra expense amd restrictions on where they can go and all this pandering is just going to mean that these trips just don't happen. It's all gonna require extra staff, more expensive insurance. All to avoid , what all the other kids are told on a regular basis, saying no.

Frankly whatever a kid or adult decides to do is up to them. However of its being done on the expectation of others going along with it and special treatment and then it's on the adults around them to ensure that its made clear that it's not theor job to do this nor have they been asked if they even consent. No is not a dirty word.kids are told it all the time every day fir their own good their own safety and because their wants do not trump everyone else's needs.