The Guardian did an article last year when the ruling was made that explains a bit more about the case (but not much): www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/dec/07/loud-academic-wins-unfair-dismissal-case-against-university
They didn’t find sex or race discrimination except in regards to one comment at a return to work meeting. But they did find the firing unfair and that seems like a big award (maybe not for a physicist?). So not sure what’s going on.
This article makes it sound like they fired her because she shouts at people and blames it on her ethnicity. Not sure I would want people to be able to use ethnicity as an excuse for shouting at people in the work place, but since the tribunal ruled the firing unfair suspect there’s a little more to it than that.
But I also wonder if maybe they may not have taken into account how she had to be when she started as the only female academic in the department and are now wanting rid of those characteristics as things have changed, but it’s unfair on her because she sort of needed to be like that to survive and trailblazer a path…