Matt Walsh asks trans activist 'what is a woman'..

The transactivists on twitter are excited about this thread.

I can't even muster up enough interest to click on your link.

There are nine fucking characteristics in the Equality Act. It is not the Gender Identity Equality Act.

Quite.

Wow. Good.
We need people to say this out loud.

We can argue about differing views on abortion with Matt once we've got the world to agree a man cannot be a women.

That's not surprising really. I've yet to see a gender ideologist on twitter who seems capable of separating out the opinion from the opinion-giver. So, in their view, everyone is either good or bad, and the opinions good people believe in are good, and the opinions bad people believe in are bad.

It's why they have to convince everyone else (and themselves) that JKR is bad - she has to be bad, otherwise people might just listen to her.

This guy is bad (and, yes, lots of his opinions are pretty dodgy), so therefore we all have to agree that every opinion he has on everything is bad.

It has to be simple - the ideology just doesn't stand up to any sort of nuance.

Mmm! And we are NOT being monitored?

If any of you Twitterites are still here: We know he also has some abhorrent ideas. But that doesn't stop him beng right on this one!

We are, after all, not BORG.

The transactivists on twitter are excited about this thread.

twitter.com/setoacnna/status/1484467833169977358?t=HeoDd13DhzH9s8amcgA3lA&s=19

I am so bored of right wingers spouting 'left wing gender ideology'.

I saw a link to a parody article about M&Ms introducing a new character who identifies as a Skittle.

I didn't realise it was based on something real, and just as ridiculous.

why is the battleground always what is a woman, why not what is a man?

I mean, where's the disabled M&M?

Where's the one with beliefs/faith?

Where's the pregnant one?

There are nine fucking characteristics in the Equality Act. It is not the Gender Identity Equality Act.

When did 'inclusive' get changed in meaning to 'pretending sex is something other than it is'?

Ooh! Some of those respones

The green one will become more female and show empowerment by being a swimmer
The yellow one will claim to be female and not lose its nuts
The red one will swim, suck at it, claim to be a female swimmer and then beat the tar out of the green candy repeatedly

twitter.com/mattwalshblog/status/1484294945087590400?s=21

“This is not a parody”

M&M's too exclusionary? Should be M&MTF's?

M&M’s are apparently getting a new look to become more ‘inclusive’

As in the chocolate? How do you make chocolate more inclusive?

That was great to watch, go Matt, not that I agree with everything he stands for but on this he was right on point. Also had a browse at his wall and am sure I saw a post stating that M&M’s are apparently getting a new look to become more ‘inclusive’?

Wow that was so refreshing to see!

I agree - the people he's talking to there (i.e. the TRAs on the show with him) are bad people who don't care about the harm they cause. I love what he said for its clarity, simplicity and truth.

@nolongersurprised and @NotBadConsidering make important points about that Loudon County father.

I worry about that - he was desperate for someone to hear his daughter, and was dismissed by the school and the media - what about his community?

If he has support from other parents then things can escalate into civil unrest quickly. If he doesn't have local support, well, that way madness lies.

My impression is that MW has sympathy for the dad and is using his platform to add some sunlight to an unjust situation. MW benefits with clicks and attention, but he's got a point - a civilised society would not be so casual with the safety of girls.

I hope that man and his family are doing ok.

Oh yes! I thought it was simply the tv show discussion :)

[quote DoubleTweenQueen]Developments:
twitter.com/MattWalshBlog/status/1484268313815441418[/quote]
That’s in the OP

Jesus - well, that pulled no punches..

Mind you, given his opinions he should probably take some of his own advice too.........

Developments:
twitter.com/MattWalshBlog/status/1484268313815441418

AAAAnd one more thing.

Women are endlessly told that we'll get to women's issues once this bigger injustice is rectified (yes, I did watch that movie about Dagenham recently), we're just doing the same thing here - we'll take this person's support on this issue, and then work on other issues once this one is solved.

I also wish I knew what it was that possess people to go onto a TV show completely unprepared and unable to define their terms.

He thought he was prepared - he tried the - "Oh, it's sexual organs/reproduction - what if someone's had them removed/doesn't want to have kids" line, as if that was a massive gotcha - which obviously it isn't. If you had a uterus to remove then YOU HAD A UTERUS