Matt Walsh asks trans activist 'what is a woman'..

Bit late to the game isn't he??!!

If you can be bothered to trawl back through his Twitter feed (I can’t be) he was on it from the onset, and one of the first to link to the Daily Wire article. He controversially rented a house in Virginia so he could then have access to the school board meetings prior to last year’s elections for governor so he could discuss this issue on the ground, as it were. The election was, incidentally, won by Youngkin, the Republican

Bit late to the game isn't he??!!

We had loads of press on it over here for crying out loud!

Girl was attacked middle of last YEAR!

Well done him? For being at forefront of raising awareness?!

It was in mainstream USA news channels!

This is the only point got left to say ha UK woman so far left can't see arse from elbow doesn't want anyone with political views not hers saying rape is bad?

Come off it.

This bloke saying rape is bad waaay after it was in public eye including at least one other country. Is what is in the end the only thing that matters?

Don't be silly.

PS are you aware here massive news free months back about sexual harrassment, assault, rape massive issue schools and being routinely covered up?
Prob irrelevant....

Weird thread for sure.

And amazed others up posting during the hours we've been chatting. Night owls the lot of us!

Mind boggling.

Only to you it seems.

We are not in America!

Dr Phil is on UK TV also, and if you don’t think US politics and culture influences the UK, firstly, that’s obviously bonkers, and secondly, you should be able to answer my question without fear of the American right wing politics and culture having any bearing on you. Why are you in fear of the US right if you don’t think the US has any influence on the UK at all?

being super interested in some bloke

Again, we are not interested in “some bloke” we are interested in what he said on a hugely influential TV show.

Your links may be relevant, but to another thread, not this one. This one is about someone making these issues known in this instance. If you want to talk about UK people talking bollocks about sex and gender, start a thread on that, but it doesn’t negate this thread.

Do you or do you not think it’s a good thing that Matt Walsh brought the horrible events in Loudoun County to wider prominence on a TV show with a huge audience?

We are not in America!

Why this insistence on random UK women from thousands of miles away, being super interested in some bloke who hardly anyone will have heard of here, in a show that they've never heard of before?

You understand that vast vast majority people here would see this bloke as a total right wing loon? Who is of zero interest and has zero relevance to their lives?

Yet when I explain. With examples! That over here there's plenty of powerful people on big audience stuff talking bollocks on sex/gender. And that going to be way more interesting over here.

I get told that's irrelevant. Nothing to do with anything. Because not seen by 6 million USA people?

Thanks for posting OP. If it helps the later discussion here, I don't know who this guy is, and it sounds like I'd disagree with him on other issues, but I'm really pleased to see a bit of good sense here. The more discussion we have on these issues the more we expose TRA arguments as what they are.

But you didn’t answer the yes or no question!

Ok, going back to lurking. This thread is a bit hypnotic.

Do you or do you not think it’s a good thing that Matt Walsh brought the horrible events in Loudoun County to wider prominence on a TV show with a huge audience?

Evidence claim now please that USA involved in England/Wales maybe wider. In pushing gender > sex since at least early 80s.

Also that the small group who have merrily said worked behind closed doors, got their ideas and etc from USA.

…Require research!

Lol I wasn’t even intending to post that, no one needs my intervention, I just got frustrated reading it and started typing.

I'm being asked if I object to anyone (this guy) saying rape is bad?

I’ve mostly lurked on this thread but I’m pretty sure you were not asked that.

You were asked this:

Do you or do you not think it’s a good thing that Matt Walsh brought the horrible events in Loudoun County to wider prominence on a TV show with a huge audience?

Idk why you Googled when he first got into the Loudoun thing, doesn’t seem relevant to the question which is a yes or no question that doesn’t

The link has been posted for you on the previous page and several times in the thread:

mobile.twitter.com/mattwalshblog/status/1483925582274564097?s=10

He brings the Loudoun County rapes to a wider audience who might otherwise not have known about it. Do you think this is a good thing or a bad thing? It’s a simple question.

Oh and,

Has he spoken out about sexual assaults on girls in school by boys in general?

Because that's linked obv.

The behaviour of the school, the body that oversees them etc. Police. All that.

Huge structural problem must be addressed. Anyone got the latest on that?

I've had a look at when as far as I can see MW got into the Loudoun thing.

Read what he said at first council (whatever called) meeting went to.

Didn't mention anything at all about the girl attacked.

Personally the treatment of the dad, and the unmitigated shitshow about safeguarding revealed in court is the most important thing.

When did he bring to attention? V early on was it? Because my googling seemed to point not, but obv can't be sure.

I'm being asked if I object to anyone (this guy) saying rape is bad?

Well that's a bit of a leap!

You'll need to evidence that it's a bold claim

After you’ve answered my question, which I have now asked repeatedly:

Do you or do you not think it’s a good thing that Matt Walsh brought the horrible events in Loudoun County to wider prominence on a TV show with a huge audience?

Got anything to show that?

Because TW were in women's prison here from at least early 80s.

Public lied to about early 2000s single sex wards. Documented.

Plenty things stating by those involved. That been years of work behind scenes by v small group activists. To quietly get things changed that trans people wanted.

Yes SM awash with USA people applying USA history, social views, politics, religion etc to UK without any thought apparently. That it's totally irrelevant here.

But USA behind scenes pushing this for at least 40 years?

You'll need to evidence that it's a bold claim.

[quote CheeseMmmm]Try these for starters-

Shadow chancellor (was then not sure now) makes complete arse of self - vid top article.
Nick Ferrari asking questions, he's definitely and well known to be generally right politics wise.

www.lbc.co.uk/radio/presenters/nick-ferrari/labour-mp-struggles-to-answer-if-its-transphobic-to-say-only-women-have-a-cervix/

Leader of opposition BBC
Again vid at top. What a wriggly politician display. Kier imo hopeless.
Evening standard not left at all.
www.standard.co.uk/video/news/trans-rights-starmer-says-mp-was-wrong-to-say-only-women-have-a-cervix-v4c9c2366[/quote]
What has ANY of that got to do with the price of Cheese? Start a thread on it if you want.

Do you or do you not think it’s a good thing that Matt Walsh brought the horrible events in Loudoun County to wider prominence on a TV show with a huge audience?

Plenty more where that came from!

Politicians. IE in parliament.
Things well known in UK and both BBC prog and Ferrari well known. In fact Ferrari vv listened to.

There's loads and loads more.

This chap no idea why anyone would think yep listen up UK here's The Man!

And to answer your question as to why it’s relevant to the UK, the answer is of course it bloody is. All of this ideology has transgressed from other countries, particularly the USA. Children in the UK are given puberty blockers because they came under pressure from parents who were taking their children to the USA. Political parties all over the world look at the social trends and policies in other countries because of the influence they have on voting in their own countries.

Try these for starters-

Shadow chancellor (was then not sure now) makes complete arse of self - vid top article.
Nick Ferrari asking questions, he's definitely and well known to be generally right politics wise.

www.lbc.co.uk/radio/presenters/nick-ferrari/labour-mp-struggles-to-answer-if-its-transphobic-to-say-only-women-have-a-cervix/

Leader of opposition BBC
Again vid at top. What a wriggly politician display. Kier imo hopeless.
Evening standard not left at all.
www.standard.co.uk/video/news/trans-rights-starmer-says-mp-was-wrong-to-say-only-women-have-a-cervix-v4c9c2366

And I’ll give you some advice and reassurance Cheese

If you answer that question and you say “yes, it’s a good thing” no one will think bad of you. It doesn’t make you a bad person because you agreed with the bad man. No one cares really. Your life will not be altered, you won’t suddenly start protesting outside abortion clinics chanting “baby killers!”

If you don’t think it’s a good thing the Loudoun rapes were brought to a wider audience then explain why, without discussing the person who did it.

We are saying (sorry if forced teaming, notbad) that this clip is really important, especially for those people who may have never heard about the rape in the bathroom, as there was a cover up.

This is what the clip is about, it’s from the show. There’s nothing about Canada, Karl Rittenhouse, abortion, forced marriage or Chris Christie or anything else you’ve brought up to somehow try to demonstrate why Matt Walsh exposing the idiocy and dangerousness of the TRAs is bad.

Feels like I'm taking to his fan club or something!

And I feel like I’m arguing with a teenager.

Do you or do you not think it’s a good thing that Matt Walsh brought the horrible events in Loudoun County to wider prominence on a TV show with a huge audience?

I watched the clip in OP! You want me to watch more?!

If not careful I'll bung up vid by David icke. Or Timmy mallet. And insist you watch it!

Actually got an awesome clip for you. Tangentially related to topic! Interested to hear views.

80s, anyone remember the clothes show?

I need to look at this guy in depth to understand that he's somehow... Ok?

You don’t need to look at the guy at all! Just listen to what he said.

Do you know what ad hominem means?

I need to look at this guy in depth to understand that he's somehow... Ok?

No, that is the clip that notbad and I have been talking about, the one where he talks about the girl being raped in the bathroom.

It’s not about Matt Walsh in depth, it’s the main discussion point of this thread.