You obviously feel very strongly about a UK woman who you don't know at all
No, I just feel strongly about identity politics, which you’re embodying.
Who having made the effort to find info about the Man the thread is about
Which I have no issue with. Good for you, being informed.
The man who is from a totally different country. Clearly contraversial in country from. General views are based in USA political environment and discourse. Plus loads of other USA specific cultural historical background. His views beyond extreme to vast majority people here.
His views on other things maybe, but not trans ideology.
A man I've never heard of before on a chat show (!) I've never heard of before.
Which I find a bit strange, Dr Phil has been around for a long time, on Oprah before getting his own show, but whatever.
You seem really taken aback that on having a look. A woman on MN feminism would (also watched the video the thread is about and no I'm not watching more I know more about this man than I ever needed to. And I didn't need to know anything because totally irrelevant in every way to average UK person).
I’m not taken aback you had a look, I’m taken aback you can’t proffer an opinion simply on the words he said in the multiple clips, because of other things he has said at other times.
That you're so appalled and taken aback and frankly insulting. By said woman thinking essentially.
I have asked you to explain your thinking. You haven’t.
No mark random. Zero relevance here. Also, clear utter total unapologetic ville piece of work.
The first part of this makes zero sense, but the relevance has been explained multiple times, I won’t bother again. Others see this as highly relevant.
And. Plenty people who aren't utter scumbags who are in UK, relevant, understand our culture etc
Start a thread on their views then.
No thanks not for me
Good for you. Why keep returning then?
That really makes you feel, unhappy? Angry?
It makes me annoyed that I am being accused of dismissing someone’s other views just because I agree with one view, being likened to right wing fundamentalists, and being implicated in the perpetuation of TRA trolling propaganda for daring to express my view without considering it might be screenshot. Like pp said, that is a TRA strategy you’re implementing.
On child rape. Dead girl Vs alive girl. He says dead girl please if saving means termination
And I disagree. It’s not hard.
You really can't understand why, given the points above about USA nothing to do with me
So why are you here posting it it’s irrelevant to you?
You can't begin to understand why a woman might think that. Other than her being a brainless, thoughtless, hopeless zombie of a person? Or whatever you said. It wasn't exactly complimentary and there was a lot of it!
No, what I actually can’t understand and haven’t got an answer about is why you can’t offer an opinion on what he actually said.
Why do you give a toss? Why is it such a massive deal to you that I think the dead/alive girl matters in this conversation which you have brought rape into multiple times?
You can bring up what you want, but it has no relevance to what Walsh said on Dr Phil. If you want to know how Walsh’s abortion views fit with Walsh’s views on the Loudoun rapes, ask him.
I'm no threat to you. You really can't see why it could actually be perfectly understandable for me to think that, even though you strongly disagree?
You’re no threat to me, but your way of thinking is a threat to progress in preventing further Loudoun County type scandals happening. The thinking that only the “correct” people with the purest of histories and thoughts can help us. Well, that’s how we got here in the first place, by virtue signalling and ignoring those with concerns because they weren’t the “right” people.
I've not tried to change your mind. I've been trying to understand your reasons for Insisting that anyone who doesn't watch this and that and SAY HE'S RIGHT is a total git.
You won’t change my mind on my view on what he said. He said quite a simple thing and I agree with it. I don’t think anyone who doesn’t say he’s right is a “TOTAL GIT”, I just expect people to explain why they think he’s wrong based on the words he actually said, which I don’t think is a difficult concept.
I have been trying to understand YOUR reasoning for dismissing the words he said. You’ve made it clear it’s because he doesn’t pass your integrity test, purity test, relevance test. You’ve come up with multiple ways of not even addressing the words he said, not even getting to those, because of the barriers you’ve set in between.
Like I said, enlightening.