No. And it's really depressing the BPS has come out with this.
Also doubly unbelievable territory when looking at how Stonewall define 'conversion therapy', and how many of our large institutions who would provide counselling and therapies, are signed up.
www.bacp.co.uk/events-and-resources/ethics-and-standards/mou/
And SW definitions in the questionnaire:
Definition of So-Called “Conversion Therapies” and Practices:
(Taken from their survey):-
Our recommended legal definition combines elements of the legislation in place in both Madrid, Spain and Queensland, Australia, which are the two best examples of international
legislation. This is because the Madrid definition is the most inclusive of various forms of conversion practices and the Queensland definition ensures that gender-affirming treatments are not included in a ban:
“Conversion therapies”:
i) Encompass all medical, psychiatric, psychological, religious, cultural or any other interventions that seek to erase, repress or change the sexual orientation and/or gender identity of a person, including aversive therapies or any other procedure that Involves an attempt to convert, cancel or suppress sexual orientation, gender identity and/or gender expression.
ii) Do not include any practice that—
(a) assists a person who is undergoing a gender transition; or
(b) assists a person who is considering undergoing a gender transition; or
(c) assists a person to express their gender identity; or
(d) provides acceptance, support and understanding of a person; or
(e) facilitates a person’s coping skills, social support and identity exploration and development.
*don't know whether point e refers to exploration and development of affirmed identity only, but content would suggest so