For me the places I have been assaulted are on top of a bus, on a train, walking home and at a party. All very public places. You have to be aware everywhere.
I’m sorry to hear that, and of course I agree that as women, we have to be aware everywhere, because of the actions and attitudes towards us of the opposite sex - something which is not the case for male people like Izzard.
When you were growing up there were still strong social taboos against men accessing the women’s toilets, women and girls felt justified in challenging a man who was in there, and so the likelihood of being sexually assaulted there was less. It still happened of course but obviously the opportunities for predators are far greater now that men are being encouraged to self ID as women and access women only spaces without fear of challenge.
The fact that all of us are so sadly familiar with the reality and ubiquity of male sexual assault/harassment makes me ask: why would anyone pursue a policy which makes it easier for those males to assault females, not harder; which offers them more opportunities to access victims, not fewer?
What kind of a world says not how can we keep women and girls more safe from predatory males, but how can we make them even less safe than they already were?
One which quite simply doesn’t value people of the female sex as highly as people of the male sex, I would suggest. One that regards people of the female sex fundamentally as service humans, here to facilitate the lives of the primary humans, the male ones.