Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

The tone of this suggests further turning of the tide.. can we dare to hope!!

112 replies

loopyapp · 18/12/2021 17:24

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10322699/ALISON-BOSHOFF.html

First time I've read mainstream reporting supportive of JKR!!!

OP posts:
Artichokeleaves · 21/12/2021 15:10

Always interesting when people who like to name and define their own labels for themselves, and obviously find those labels meaningful and important, are unwilling to permit others to do the same.

I suspect if I said that I as an adult female homosexual had exactly the same lived experience and knowledge as a TW, I'd be scolded for invalidating the very unique experience of having transitioned, that I could not possibly know what it was like, that I could not possibly understand experiencing other people's feelings towards that transition and living as a trans lesbian.

Why this necessity to insist, female words, experiences, definitions and existence must be blurred and subsumed and stomped out to fit male needs better?

Not really doing much in the winning hearts and minds stakes. They're separate, unique experiences. They're not the same thing. It is not necessary to devalue one group of people in order to sufficiently prop up another. Nor is it acceptable.

Waitwhat23 · 21/12/2021 15:02

@roaringtolangcleginthedark as always, fantastic post. And thank you for mentioning this point -

'It’s quite ludicrous that you try to muddy the waters like this, and it’s reminded me that you don’t actually acknowledge exclusive same-sex attraction as a genuine sexual orientation at all - if I remember rightly, you seem to think that everybody is bisexual to some degree, deep down, and just in denial about it. Which, again, is homophobia.'

As I've been a bit baffled by that poster's mentioning of bisexuality in the context of same sex attraction - the idea that women might only be attracted to other women seems to be a difficult concept.

RoaringtoLangClegintheDark · 21/12/2021 13:57

You haven’t really answered my questions, have you, Helen?

How’s about this one:

Do you think those people who are exclusively same sex attracted should be supported by LGBT orgs such as Stonewall?

I would like your answer to that instead of the way you avoided that part of the question in your reply.

And when I say “those relationships” I mean relationships between two people who are both clear they are only attracted to the same sex. Of course the relationships in itself doesn’t really differ from that which you have with your partner, but the point as, is you well know, that exclusively same sex attracted people are being ostracised and excluded by “LGBT” orgs for being clear that they will never consider partners of the opposite sex, however they identify.

That exclusion and ostracism doesn’t affect you because you are bisexual and your partner presumably signs up to “same gender” attraction in theory (and luckily is unlikely to have to actually put it to the test as your relationship is so committed), so you two can cheerlead for the theory at no personal cost whatsoever.

So that’s how your relationship is different from that between two women who are challenging the pressure to consider biologically male people as potential partners. You’re included in the great big rainbow family; they’re excluded. Nice.

I see this as on a spectrum with specifying any other criteria about a potential partner - eg no one over 40, under 5 foot tall, East Asian, deaf, fat etc.

That’s deeply homophobic. These are sexual preferences, not sexual orientations, as has been spelt out to you on here many, many times before. Nobody has ever been discriminated against or persecuted because they weren’t attracted to people from races different to their own, and so on.

It’s quite ludicrous that you try to muddy the waters like this, and it’s reminded me that you don’t actually acknowledge exclusive same-sex attraction as a genuine sexual orientation at all - if I remember rightly, you seem to think that everybody is bisexual to some degree, deep down, and just in denial about it. Which, again, is homophobia.

Apart from which, people are fully entitled to their sexual preferences and to state them clearly on a dating site, FFS, otherwise it’s just wasting everybody’s time. Why would anyone want to pressure someone who is never going to be attracted to them into considering them as a partner? What is that if not coercion? And when it comes to actual sexual orientation, the same argument applies tenfold. It shouldn’t even be a discussion. It should be accepted, full stop.

Why is it, Helen, you seem to struggle so much with the concept of women saying no to all biologically male people as potential sexual/romantic partners? I really can’t get my head around it. Does women saying no to men/male people make you uncomfortable in general? It’s a really, really unusual attitude to find in a woman, particularly a woman who thinks of herself as a feminist.

I mean, you might expect it in some deeply devout women who follow a very patriarchal religion, or some very reactionary women who believe in male authority over females, but from someone like you it just seems really odd.

But if I saw a gay man carrying a placard declaring how repulsed they are by vaginas that would strike me as unhelpful, unpleasant and a touch misogynistic.

What an odd response, again. Where have you seen anyone doing that or suggesting that? Nobody is advocating for that, to the very best of my knowledge. And again, your invented scenario has been a means for you to sidestep the question you don’t want to answer.

I ask you again - Do you think people who are exclusively same-sex attracted should be able to be out and proud about their sexual orientation, or should they have to keep it quiet in case it hurts trans people’s feelings?

And let’s be sensible about this and not make up rubbish. We’re not talking about imaginary gay men wandering around with placards saying “fannies smell, yuck gross!”, FFS. We’re simply talking about the right of people who are exclusively same sex attracted to own their own sexuality, to have it acknowledged by LGBT orgs and by society in general without being ostracised or shamed for it, without having to whisper it in secret and make up their own special code for finding other people who feel the same way, like they did in the bad old days.

Just being able to state their orientation freely and have it respected, whether that be on a dating app, at work when someone is trying to set them up with someone of the wrong sex, or whatever scenario there may be where someone’s sexual orientation is relevant.

I think I already know all your answers to my questions though, precisely from the way you haven’t answered them, and I can only conclude that you, notwithstanding that you say you’re a bisexual woman in a long term relationship with a woman, must be a homophobe when it comes to actual homosexuals.

Not so good to see you again after all.

334bu · 21/12/2021 13:31

I meant a bisexual female person and lesbian,.

334bu · 21/12/2021 13:28

See above re how a relationship between two exclusively same sex attracted people differs from a relationship between two bisexual people of the same sex.

If both pairs are in committed exclusive homosexual relationships, I am not sure what the difference is, except for the possibility in the future that a bisexual person might consider a heterosexual relationship with a man, transwoman or male born non binary person , whereas a homosexual person would only consider a relationship with a person of the same sex.

Scraggythang · 21/12/2021 13:23

@PurgatoryOfPotholes I remember the woman who shared that on Twitter. She had been kicked out of the group for questioning this.

Helen8220 · 21/12/2021 12:23

@RoaringtoLangClegintheDark
Hi Helen, good to see you again.

Thanks, I just don’t seem to be able to stay away.

Do you think those people who are exclusively same sex attracted should be supported by LGBT orgs such as Stonewall? Are those relationships just as valid as those between people who aren’t fussed about the sex of their partner as long as their “gender” turns them on?

When you say ‘those relationships’, it appears you mean an ‘exclusively same sex attracted relationship’ - what do you mean exactly by that? How is it different from my relationship with my partner, where we are both bisexual (which is a matter of our individual histories and sense of identity, but makes no difference to our relationship with each other)?

Do you think lesbians should be able to specify on a lesbian dating app that they’re only interested in other biologically female partners if that’s their sexual orientation? Without being booted off the app?

Probably yes, but I think there are better and worse ways to communicate it. I see this as on a spectrum with specifying any other criteria about a potential partner - eg no one over 40, under 5 foot tall, East Asian, deaf, fat etc. The bottom line is, we’re not in control of who we’re attracted to, and no one should be pressured into any sort of romantic or sexual involvement with anyone, obviously. But our criteria for a partner don’t exist in a vacuum, and we should be aware of how the way we express them might impact on others.

Do you think people who are exclusively same-sex attracted should be able to be out and proud about their sexual orientation, or should they have to keep it quiet in case it hurts trans people’s feelings?

Again, it’s just a matter of how you express yourself. I’ve been on many pride marches and I’ve seen people express their pride about their queerness in a wonderful range of ways. But if I saw a gay man carrying a placard declaring how repulsed they are by vaginas that would strike me as unhelpful, unpleasant and a touch misogynistic.

Just trying to get a feel for exactly how valid, healthy, valuable and acceptable you think relationships between exclusively same-sex attracted people are

See above re how a relationship between two exclusively same sex attracted people differs from a relationship between two bisexual people of the same sex.

Datun · 21/12/2021 09:49

@PurgatoryOfPotholes

This is a person who identifies as a transwoman, who moderates a group for women who like travelling. This individual is sexually attracted to women, and was in a relationship with a woman.

If you think this person ever has to worry about being seen publicly holding hands with a girlfriend, I have a bridge to sell you.

Ffs. Make up tips and being girly.
FrancescaContini · 21/12/2021 09:29

@PurgatoryOfPotholes

This is a person who identifies as a transwoman, who moderates a group for women who like travelling. This individual is sexually attracted to women, and was in a relationship with a woman.

If you think this person ever has to worry about being seen publicly holding hands with a girlfriend, I have a bridge to sell you.

Make up tips!

Yep, cos all we women love swapping make up tips.

Datun · 21/12/2021 08:52

@ChakaFridaMendips

So if a religious person scolds a lesbian for not being in a relationship with a male it’s homophobia, but if the LGBT ‘community’ scolds a lesbian for not considering the same thing they somehow have the moral high ground?
Precisely.

Disagreement with lesbians being solely same sex attracted is homophobia.

Disagreement with lesbians being solely same sex attracted is transgenderism.

PurgatoryOfPotholes · 21/12/2021 08:40

This is a person who identifies as a transwoman, who moderates a group for women who like travelling. This individual is sexually attracted to women, and was in a relationship with a woman.

If you think this person ever has to worry about being seen publicly holding hands with a girlfriend, I have a bridge to sell you.

The tone of this suggests further turning of the tide.. can we dare to hope!!
MsGrumpytrousers · 21/12/2021 00:14

@prudencepuffin

The ultimate hope is that you will end up worrying so much about being right-wing that you will fall into line on gender identity philosophy and sign women's rights away, in order to buff up your left-wing credentials.

True. And it wont bloody work!!!

Also, it's such a pathetic scattergun approach. Accuse us of being racist; accuse us of being right wing; accuse us of being anti-Semitic - it's just any old crap they can come up with to avoid actually having a proper discussion, because they don't actually have anything rational to offer. No wonder the preferred stance was 'No debate'.
MsGrumpytrousers · 21/12/2021 00:02

@334bu

*For example a woman in a relationship with a trans women who refers to her partner as a wife or girlfriend might not be invited to a work function where people are invited to bring spouses*

This would be transphobia, not homophobia surely, as in most cases it will be obvious that their partner is a transwoman. However, if the company has a blanket ban on inviting the spouses of their homosexual employees and they have not yet met their employee's spouse, then it might be considered homophobic as the company is unaware that they are a heterosexual couple.

I think that this is the first time I have ever seen the word transphobic applied to something that is actually transphobic. I had to read it twice.
RoaringtoLangClegintheDark · 20/12/2021 23:44

Hi Helen, good to see you again.

Do you think those people who are exclusively same sex attracted should be supported by LGBT orgs such as Stonewall? Are those relationships just as valid as those between people who aren’t fussed about the sex of their partner as long as their “gender” turns them on?

Do you think lesbians should be able to specify on a lesbian dating app that they’re only interested in other biologically female partners if that’s their sexual orientation? Without being booted off the app?

Do you think people who are exclusively same-sex attracted should be able to be out and proud about their sexual orientation, or should they have to keep it quiet in case it hurts trans people’s feelings?

Just trying to get a feel for exactly how valid, healthy, valuable and acceptable you think relationships between exclusively same-sex attracted people are Xmas Smile

ChakaFridaMendips · 20/12/2021 23:39

So if a religious person scolds a lesbian for not being in a relationship with a male it’s homophobia, but if the LGBT ‘community’ scolds a lesbian for not considering the same thing they somehow have the moral high ground?

Datun · 20/12/2021 21:34

barleybadminton

Your answers are tedious. And predictable.

If someone perceives you as same-sex, even if you're not, then it's homophobia based on their perception, not based on your sex.

The same way discrimination can happen if someone perceives you to be disabled, or perceives you to be nonwhite.

But if a man and a woman are in a relationship, and everyone perceives them as such, irrespective of their gender identity, they are not homosexual.

This is just so basic it's not even worth talking about.

And Helen8220 of course all relationships are valid. But homosexual relationship are based on same-sex attraction. That's it. It doesn't make them less valid. It does make them subject to homophobia.

Homophobia is a reaction to same-sex relationships/attraction.

Strewth.

334bu · 20/12/2021 21:32

Completely agree, I have no idea what this ridiculous gatekeeping is supposed to achieve.

Ridiculous!!!?? Are you saying that same sex relationships don't exist and if they do they are the same as a same gender relationship? This is the very epitome of homophobia!

Linguini · 20/12/2021 21:27

Should lesbians be able to define themselves as females attracted to females without fear of violence or accusations of bigotry?

Linguini · 20/12/2021 21:26

Should a woman be attacked by a person with a penis for sexually rejecting them? When both of them identify as lesbians?

Helen8220 · 20/12/2021 21:21

And yes; there is a conflict between apparent homosexuality through gender transition, choice and appearance, and actual homosexuality which is sex based. It's important to be honest about this.

What conflict? Also I’m not sure what choice has to do with it, I’ve always been very dubious about the argument that gay people have to be accepted because they were ‘born that way’ or they can’t ‘help it’. Same sex (or gender) relationships should be accepted and valued purely because (to repeat myself) they are just as valuable and valid as opposite sex/gender relationships. If I face discrimination because I’m in a relationship with a woman is that my fault because I’m bisexual and so freely chose a woman as my life partner rather than a man?

334bu · 20/12/2021 21:20

For example a woman in a relationship with a trans women who refers to her partner as a wife or girlfriend might not be invited to a work function where people are invited to bring spouses

This would be transphobia, not homophobia surely, as in most cases it will be obvious that their partner is a transwoman. However, if the company has a blanket ban on inviting the spouses of their homosexual employees and they have not yet met their employee's spouse, then it might be considered homophobic as the company is unaware that they are a heterosexual couple.

Helen8220 · 20/12/2021 21:13

@barleybadminton

I think it's quite likely same gender couples face quite a bit of homophobia. It seems a bit mean spirited to then tell them well yes you do, but you're not gay even if they and much of society views them that way.

Completely agree, I have no idea what this ridiculous gatekeeping is supposed to achieve.

littlbrowndog · 20/12/2021 20:22

Her Xmas book doing great

No 1 in the best sellers list

Go JKR

barleybadminton · 20/12/2021 20:08

@334bu

They can be in a heterosexual relationship but if their attacker mistakes them for a same sex couple and attacks them because they are in the attacker's opinion homosexual, then it is a homophobic attack. The fact they are a heterosexual couple is irrelevant, as what is important is the attacker's intent
So that kind of thing could happen quite a lot I imagine. For example a woman in a relationship with a trans women who refers to her partner as a wife or girlfriend might not be invited to a work function where people are invited to bring spouses. Or a trans man and cis man in a relationship might be turned down for a one bedroom flat because there are two male names on the application. I think it's quite likely same gender couples face quite a bit of homophobia. It seems a bit mean spirited to then tell them well yes you do, but you're not gay even if they and much of society views them that way..
334bu · 20/12/2021 20:04

They can be in a heterosexual relationship but if their attacker mistakes them for a same sex couple and attacks them because they are in the attacker's opinion homosexual, then it is a homophobic attack. The fact they are a heterosexual couple is irrelevant, as what is important is the attacker's intent