Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Does anyone have any real stats on mental health and using preferred pronouns?

32 replies

Spottybluepyjamas · 28/11/2021 15:54

As the title says, I'm looking for stats around using preferred names/pronouns - particularly for children, but not sure where to go to get accurate ones. I keep seeing stats being shared like 'using preferred pronouns reduces risk of suicide in children by 43%' but I'm not sure where these are coming from, never mind if they're correct or not!

I feel like anyone can just share any stats and no one will question it, especially when it comes to the mental health of children and I'd quite like to rebuff if possible with some real information!

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Shedmistress · 29/11/2021 11:52

In answer to the question, I think one female centred organisation did some research a couple of years back into teen suicide and could find no link to being transgender.

Which is very positive news, that nobody was actually killing themselves due to being trans.

Shedmistress · 29/11/2021 11:50

But until the enormous benefits for trans people enabled to live our lives in freedom and peace are recognised, then 'questions' will be interpreted as hate however legitimate they may be.

Your freedom to live your life surely ends at the point that you step into female spaces and start blethering on about yourself in answer to a question about actual facts.

Like coming on MN FWR telling us all about you.

Do you not even see this? Does it ever register that the OP isn't asking about YOU.

NotBadConsidering · 29/11/2021 11:43

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

EmbarrassingHadrosaurus · 29/11/2021 11:15

@ArabellaScott

How can we recognise benefits if we can't measure them? How can research be done if we can't ask questions?

What is the suggestion here, research can't be conducted because it would be 'interpreted as hate', therefore we are to go on 'personal stats' , which I presume means personal anecdote? Have I understood you correctly, Robin?

That seems accurate to me, Arabella.

It was the same reasoning that has had some research projects cancelled.

It is, as I miswrote previously, also a premise that would negate evidence-based appraisals for health and social care.

ArabellaScott · 29/11/2021 11:11

How can we recognise benefits if we can't measure them? How can research be done if we can't ask questions?

What is the suggestion here, research can't be conducted because it would be 'interpreted as hate', therefore we are to go on 'personal stats' , which I presume means personal anecdote? Have I understood you correctly, Robin?

Ereshkigalangcleg · 29/11/2021 10:45

I agree. But until the enormous benefits for trans people enabled to live our lives in freedom and peace are recognised, then 'questions' will be interpreted as hate however legitimate they may be.

What an odd thing to say. This is about empirical evidence.

Spottybluepyjamas · 29/11/2021 09:50

Happy to offer you some personal stats.

Thanks for your input @RobinMoiraWhite and I’m pleased that transitioning has helped your mental health. I certainly don't deny that true gender dysphoria exists, although I’m not sure that it exists to the extent that is currently being reported. I’m after quantifiable stats (and specifically for children if possible) because I think that children are so easily swayed and if told that they are agreed with, it will clearly make them feel ‘better’ - but what does that actually mean?

It’s certainly nice to be told that you’re right (especially as a teenager), but is that the best thing for them in the long run if the encouragement and support means that they start along a pathway of interventions that they regret. I’m not saying that all children will regret interventions, but I do think that the amount of children who will benefit is small in comparison to the amount of children who won’t - but this is what I’m trying to understand.

I’m not trying to show hate under the guise of questions, I’m trying to understand what is best and if there are any actual unbiased studies that show the true effect of e.g., calling a child by preferred pronouns or not - it’s such a fine balance between accepting someone for who they are, and being complicit in starting minors on a road that is difficult for them to get off.

OP posts:
FindTheTruth · 29/11/2021 04:46

❤️leafstamp

FindTheTruth · 29/11/2021 04:45

I'd quite like to rebuff if possible with some real information!

Stephanie Davies Arai has testimonies aka real information on the devastating impact on mental health of children. Mental health is mentioned 9 times in this video clip

Leafstamp · 29/11/2021 04:42

Section 6 here might be worth a read safeschoolsallianceuk.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/redflagsa4.pdf

(Same document as just posted by FindTheTruth on another thread)

FindTheTruth · 29/11/2021 04:37

pronouns - particularly for children

Adults like Robin is one thing. children are another thing entirely.

there's mounting evidence that teaching gender identity to children is the CAUSE of mental health problems, so I'd suggest starting there rather than jumping to pronouns.

CheeseMmmm · 29/11/2021 01:45

OP for UK the best stats would be from NHS.

Of course for some reason services like NHS, police etc collecting both sex and gender, giving a huge data set that would massively help the trans population in loads of ways.

Must not happen.

Weatherwax13 · 29/11/2021 01:43

Questions do not=hate. How fucking ridiculous.

CheeseMmmm · 29/11/2021 01:43

Personal stats??!!

🙄

MultiStorey · 29/11/2021 01:25

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

OldCrone · 29/11/2021 00:37

But until the enormous benefits for trans people enabled to live our lives in freedom and peace are recognised, then 'questions' will be interpreted as hate however legitimate they may be.

I think it is generally recognised that there are benefits for anyone, trans or not, when they are able to live their lives in freedom and peace, so I'm not really sure what you're getting at here @RobinMoiraWhite.

Trans people in the UK have the same rights and protections as everyone else. What more do you believe has to be done for the benefit of trans people before you will stop interpreting any questions on the subject of transgenderism as hate?

This thread was started by someone who wanted to know more about whether any statistics existed about the benefits of changing pronouns for children who identify as transgender. I didn't interpret the OP's desire to know more about this as 'hate'. Could you explain why you interpret a wish to understand more via research and statistics as 'hate'?

LonginesPrime · 28/11/2021 23:38

But until the enormous benefits for trans people enabled to live our lives in freedom and peace are recognised, then 'questions' will be interpreted as hate however legitimate they may be.

If you don't have quantitative data, you could just say that.

It doesn't mean something isn't true because there aren't any stats on it. It just means that no-one has funded research on it yet.

Why are you interpreting asking whether there are any reliable statistics out there as hate? Are we talking about science or religion here?

RepentMotherfucker · 28/11/2021 22:49

So we're not allowed to ask any questions until Robin has what Robin wants? Otherwise they are hate speech?

I think I pretty much had the same conversation today at home about who had eaten the last packet of salt and vinegar crisps but that was with a four year old.

EmbarrassingHadrosaurus · 28/11/2021 22:44

@NotBadConsidering

But until the enormous benefits for trans people enabled to live our lives in freedom and peace are recognised, then 'questions' will be interpreted as hate however legitimate they may be.

That has absolutely nothing to do with whether calling a female child “he” is ultimately helpful Hmm.

And it pretty much brings a fair amount of evidence-based scrutiny in health and social care into disrepute if questions are to be interpreted as hate rather than robust appraisal of value-based propositions (where value refers to humanitarian as well as ethical considerations).
Leafstamp · 28/11/2021 22:20

Not quite what you asked for OP, but could be interesting to challenge this by asking querying the impact on the mental health of those who are compelled to express a belief they do not hold. Or who live in fear of ‘slipping up’.

Oft quoted article: fairplayforwomen.com/pronouns/

NotBadConsidering · 28/11/2021 22:14

But until the enormous benefits for trans people enabled to live our lives in freedom and peace are recognised, then 'questions' will be interpreted as hate however legitimate they may be.

That has absolutely nothing to do with whether calling a female child “he” is ultimately helpful Hmm.

RobinMoiraWhite · 28/11/2021 22:07

@RepentMotherfucker

The word 'stats' is doing some heavy lifting there isn't it Robin? Hmm
I agree. But until the enormous benefits for trans people enabled to live our lives in freedom and peace are recognised, then 'questions' will be interpreted as hate however legitimate they may be.
NotBadConsidering · 28/11/2021 21:49

Happy to offer you some personal stats.

The OP asked for real stats. On pronouns. For children.

The answer OP, is that there aren’t any good stats, because the few studies there are show kids feel better if “supported”, which includes a variety of things. Which makes entire sense because if you tell a young child or teenager that you agree with them then they’re bound to feel happy in that particular moment.

But the studies don’t reflect suicide accurately and they don’t reflect that the confrontation with reality, particularly for teenage girls, is just kicked down the road.

RepentMotherfucker · 28/11/2021 21:44

The word 'stats' is doing some heavy lifting there isn't it Robin? Hmm

ArabellaScott · 28/11/2021 21:44

www.transgendertrend.com/the-suicide-myth/

Study of over 8k people:

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7317390/