Anti trans for asking not to conflate sex with gender?

Unless this is only for a trans audience I’d say it ignores this.

Sex is also a protected characteristic. They can’t exclude women to prioritise another protected characteristic.

It also makes it much more confusing for anyone who has a language barrier. Which will likely also include people who come under the PC of disability or race/ethnicity etc often.

They could use women and other people who menstruate if they want to be inclusive. At a push.

Quote The Equality Act in your response, they can't rewrite the law.

Sex is a named protected characteristic. Its an offense to create a hostile environment for others based on their protected characteristic; so the people challenging others for standing up for their sex based rights should have their comments removed at the very least.

Victimisation
www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/section/27

Harassment
www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/section/26

The Civil Service has a legal duty to act on your complaint.
''The Equality Act 2010 requires public authorities to:
• Eliminate unlawful discrimination, harassment and victimisation and other conduct prohibited by the Act.
• Advance equality of opportunity between people who share a protected characteristic and those who do not.
• Foster good relations between people who share a protected characteristic and those who do not.''
www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/section/149

How is 'a person who menstruates' worse than 'a woman who menstruates' ?

It’s dehumanizing language. Why the refusal to use the word for adult human females?

Are people aware of the strategy often used in warfare and in conquering a population that one strategy is psychological warfare?

Banning the language of the population is often used. Banning certain words etc.

It breaks down the unity of the population and it promotes fear in that population out of being harmed for breaking the rules.

I’m not saying that this is a strategy being used, but you can see after effects from populations that had their language outlawed.

Sorry OP that’s really rubbish! If it’s anonymous why would you be in trouble?

They should be using the correct language related to the biological state of being a woman which is a protected characteristic.

Write right back, that you are being made to feel unsafe by the erasure of the word woman from a conversation about biological female physical processes. You are also being made to feel unsafe by being misrepresented as Cis when you don't believe in genderism and you are being made to feel unsafe by the implication that your legally allowed views are not allowed to be aired in this environment.

Fuck them. It's time to start using their own shitty unsafe language against them. Fight safety with safety!

Has someone missed the point that the menopause is about turning a 'person who menstruates' into a 'person who doesn't menstruate'?

How are they going to talk about menopausal women, and those who have gone through menopause? 'people who once menstruated, but don't expect to be doing it again?'

Sorry? Who is accusing others of being a terf? A professional consultant? Colleagues?

Sorry, no suggestions, but I'm just gobsmacked that they want to talk about menopause without reference to biology.

That is factually true.
I think it sensible to ask them to be clear about their language.
It's great that some feel able to challenge.