Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

A trans-Identified BDSM fan/gun nut is now a senior leader at Girlguiding

611 replies

Scraggythang · 23/11/2021 10:59

Via Glinner’s sub stack. Sorry if this has already been posted!

grahamlinehan.substack.com/p/wtf-are-girlguiding-thinking

OP posts:
Thread gallery
14
LizziesTwin · 23/11/2021 18:12

Just to show that Girl Guides are not allowed to shoot at animal or people shaped targets.

A trans-Identified BDSM fan/gun nut is now a senior leader at Girlguiding
SheldonesqueTheBstard · 23/11/2021 18:11

Aye. They will have been totally rigorous in the checks.

Just not rigorous enough when protecting the rights of our women of the future.

They may think it was fine. Guess what…

Scraggythang · 23/11/2021 18:04

@SheldonesqueTheBstard no, they were too busy virtue signalling after women had to step down for warning them this sort of shit would happen.

We know that these kind of people need to be in female spaces for (at the very least) validation of their female identities. But those who haven’t fallen down the rabbit hole and choose to look away and remain pure only believe they are doing good by allowing one of the most marginalised in society be included.

OP posts:
FindTheTruth · 23/11/2021 18:01

UPDATE:

Tweet:

Girlguiding
@Girlguiding
The safety and wellbeing of our members is our absolute priority. We follow rigorous recruitment and vetting procedures, have clear policies, and a volunteer code of conduct which volunteers are expected to follow to keep our members safe. We are aware of concerns raised. 1/2

We are looking into this as a matter of urgency and will provide the necessary support and action in line with our compliance procedures. 2/2

twitter.com/Girlguiding/status/1463148343018889222

RedCarpetRebellion · 23/11/2021 18:00

@SheldonesqueTheBstard

Sometimes when I think I’ve seen it all, I find out I haven’t.

They weren’t nearly fucking rigorous enough.

They were. They will have done a social media check I’m sure, no one wouldn’t these days. I don’t buy they didn’t.

The problem is they thought this was fine.

If it was a woman it wouldn’t be fine, but the poor tw are just finding their feet with social rules for women and just got too enthusiastic at finally being their inner woman and let’s just support them finding their feet and learning to celebrate their sexual womanhood and offer our gracious support as we are honoured by their bravery. This can help us all grow as woman. We should be grateful to have such an opportunity to extend compassion.

SheldonesqueTheBstard · 23/11/2021 17:40

Sometimes when I think I’ve seen it all, I find out I haven’t.

They weren’t nearly fucking rigorous enough.

averylongtimeago · 23/11/2021 17:38

I noticed pp saying the page on Nottinghamshire gg about commissioners has been taken down.

A trans-Identified BDSM fan/gun nut is now a senior leader at Girlguiding
Styletryle · 23/11/2021 17:35

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

yourhairiswinterfire · 23/11/2021 17:14

including trans women and non-binary members who were recorded as female at birth, who can make their Girlguiding Promise

This is so devious. Not everyone is aware that a transwoman is actually a MtF. '' Trans women and non-binary members who were recorded as female at birth '' is suggesting transwomen are actually born female. Very sly.

Lovelyricepudding · 23/11/2021 17:09

@Helleofabore

A tweet from GG

"The safety and wellbeing of our members is our absolute priority. We follow rigorous recruitment and vetting procedures, have clear policies, and a volunteer code of conduct which volunteers are expected to follow to keep our members safe. We are aware of concerns raised."

"We are looking into this as a matter of urgency and will provide the necessary support and action in line with our compliance procedures"

Keep on writing in, I say.

necessary support and action The poor dear should be supported and action must be taken against these horrible tweeters insisting on safeguarding .
Scraggythang · 23/11/2021 16:57

[email protected]

[email protected]

If any of you would like to forward this onto the press, these journalists have been taking a keen interest in stonewall and women’s rights. Alternatively, if you’re on Twitter, they are easy to contact.

OP posts:
MinervaBoudicca · 23/11/2021 16:56

The likelihood is that Monica is a bisexual autogynephile. If you want to understand why that raises many red flags before allowing such a person to work with young teenage girls, I recommend listening to this long interview with Dr Ray Blanchard. He is the man who studied this paraphilia for years and eventually came up with the name ‘autogynephilia’. It explains a lot

transparency.podbean.com/

whitehorsesdonotlie · 23/11/2021 16:56

Under the Girlguiding's Volunteering page, under Women only tiles, it says

Some Girlguiding roles are only held by women - such as unit leader. These roles are open to all women, including trans women and non-binary members who were recorded as female at birth, who can make their Girlguiding Promise.

Some roles can only be held by women, including trans women. 🙄🙄🙄

So, not roles for just women at all! What a load of wafty unthought-through nonsense.

foxgoosefinch · 23/11/2021 16:56

@AuntDympna I think that page was there earlier today but has been swiftly taken down.

Darkpheonix · 23/11/2021 16:55

Apparently Girl Guiding on twitter carried our rigorous checks on this person.

If so, they must be aware of all this and quite happy to proceed with their appointment anyway.

But now looking into it as a matter of urgency?

So either the checks were not rigorous or they were but GG were fine with it. Either way the organisation shouldn't be trust to deal with children.

Pourvous · 23/11/2021 16:54

I live in Southwell and I've written to my MP about safeguarding concerns due to boundaries being blurred/eroded by gender ideology historically (as well as other things). I'll be writing to him about this too. I know that the local community will not be happy with this situation. It's a very MC area with low crime etc, I cannot imagine that any parent would be happy with the images that this person has shared, regardless of the intent or story behind them.

TedImgoingmad · 23/11/2021 16:47

Amazing what is allowed to be said on Chat, but is moderated on FWR.

HoardingSamphireSaurus · 23/11/2021 16:45

Pages from the website started to disappear mid afternoon. There will be archived versions somewhere, hopefully.

Magistera · 23/11/2021 16:39

Parents of guides need to vote with their feet. If they don’t then it’s obviously not an issue for them 🤷‍♀️

Shehasadiamondinthesky · 23/11/2021 16:36

For fucks sake what is happening here, my child neither male nor female would be left alone with this person.

Helleofabore · 23/11/2021 16:35

There may be archive versions of the pages if you plug the URL into archive sites.... like wayback for instance.

AuntDympna · 23/11/2021 16:32

This seems to apply to Girlguiding Nottinghamshire if I understand correctly and their webpage "Division Commissioners" does not exist:

www.girlguidingnottinghamshire.org.uk/who-we-are/meet-the-team/#division

Leafstamp · 23/11/2021 16:28

Finally, people are waking up to the fact that trans ideology paves the way for some inappropriate people to gain access to women, girls and boys.

In active threads in Chat: www.mumsnet.com/Talk/_chat/4408927-safeguarding-issues-in-the-girl-guiding-movement

Helleofabore · 23/11/2021 16:26

A tweet from GG

"The safety and wellbeing of our members is our absolute priority. We follow rigorous recruitment and vetting procedures, have clear policies, and a volunteer code of conduct which volunteers are expected to follow to keep our members safe. We are aware of concerns raised."

"We are looking into this as a matter of urgency and will provide the necessary support and action in line with our compliance procedures"

Keep on writing in, I say.

Swipe left for the next trending thread