Harrop MPTS thread 2

Those reasons are interesting. Misogynistic...wholly inappropriate...highly offensive...plainly inappropriate... concerning...

Plus one 'not proved' is because he only sent 10-20 inappropriate tweets about E, rather than 'at least 38' as the GMC had asserted. So it's more about the GMC setting its stall too high, rather than disregarding E's evidence.

There's not a lot for Haddock to crow about there.

@WitnessE I am so very sorry you had to go through this and I hope you have good people around you. AH comes across as a toxic raging misogynist regardless of the outcome and he will be forever tainted with the stain of it.

They didn’t believe me. Time to be where others are not.

Reading the findings

"Witness E was contradictory and paradoxical"

She's not a doctor and is not employed by the GMC you feminist baiting, vile, bigoted tribunal.

Apparently it's fine to say that to people so..

💐💐💐💐❤️ E ❤️💐💐💐💐

@FindTheTruth

This was in the context of Dr Harrop tweeting about looking at my kids and identifying them/their schools on Instagram.

I kicked off and was upset by this, so Dr Harrop tweeted that he was concerned by the level of my anger, that my home environment cannot be safe for my children etc and copied in these people.

This was after admitting that he had got all the details of my family from a Mr Drewitt-Barlow who was also, coincidentally, the source of a doctored screenshot of my FB in which I supposedly said that “children with cancer & AIDS deserved it because of the sins of their parents”.

Dr Harrop reported this comment and said it was entirely consistent with my views but that he wouldn’t share the (looked as though it had been doctored by a 3 year old) screenshot because I would only gaslight people by pretending it was doctored and he wasn’t prepared to facilitate gaslighting.

Sorry, off to spend time with family. But I have found the panel’s reasons for their decision fascinating. They weren’t prepared to accept unchallenged evidence.

The MPTS have provided the basis for their decision:

twitter.com/tribunaltweets/status/1463547446487920640

Dr Harrop tweeted the police, my local council, children’s services and the local press to state I was an unfit mother and he was concerned for the welfare of my children.

My god. I'm so sorry E. 💐💐💐 Intimidation and harassment by an NHS Doctor on social media is one thing but to contact children's services because you believe sex is real!! and dared to challenge his extremist ideology? This isn't right. It's appalling. WTAF is going on in this country?

I’m just highlighting the flaws in the process. The witness statements, or mine at least, was heavily redacted.

I don't understand why this happened/was allowed, hopefully someone with more knowledge will explain. Surely victims and witnesses have the right to be heard in full and the right to have all their evidence heard?

Again, a stellar endorsement of his abilities as a doctor. Absolutely right that he should carry on prescribing hardcore meds to children.

Venomous little toad. Some might think.

X-posted.

I still fail to understand the GMC's rationale on witnesses.

So sorry @MNHarpie

I’ve been incredibly distressed in the run up to the tribunal. Dr Harrop tweeted the police, my local council, children’s services and the local press to state I was an unfit mother and he was concerned for the welfare of my children.

He played on every mother’s fear.

But, and I mean this, it’s not false humility, I appreciate it’s not in the same league as physical abuse. I cannot imagine the effect this has on people.

@MonsignorMirth

We were all deemed too credible to speak and we were defamed with no right of reply. Sorry E I'm not sure I understand what you mean by "Too credible to speak"?

I don't think this has ever been clear.

It seems from the tweeted accounts that the defence chose not to cross-examine the witnesses. But what about the GMC's barrister? Why didn't he choose to examine? Again, I was never clear on this point.

WitnessE & LouiseMoody I am so sorry this process has been so difficult.

I guess we’re no longer surprised that it took so long to catch Shipman now.

I was abused as a child by a doctor but I can honestly say I was still ok with male doctors. However seeing what Harrop and to a lesser extent Jensen felt free to say publicly on twitter made me nervous that any male doctor I see could secretly hate women as much as they do.

It was agreed with Dr H’s defence that the witness statements would be heavily redacted and there would be no need for witnesses to speak.

There was no dispute over the effect that his behaviour had upon us.

The dispute seems to be over whether or not this was intended.

I'm so sorry, E. This is so distressing.

AH will get his comeuppance. I believe that. It might not be this time, but it will come.

We were all deemed too credible to speak and we were defamed with no right of reply.
Sorry E
I'm not sure I understand what you mean by "Too credible to speak"?

❤️🌸💐to both

Nothing I can say here will affect any sanction applied to Adrian Harrop or have any impact on the assessment on his fitness to practice.

I’m just highlighting the flaws in the process. The witness statements, or mine at least, was heavily redacted.

We were all deemed too credible to speak and we were defamed with no right of reply.

And the whole affair was limited to 4 specific complainants which we know is the tip of the iceberg.

It may just be that intention to intimidate is too difficult to prove.

Women can make up their own mind whether or not they feel safe in the care of this doctor. I am very concerned for my child, whose full name Dr Harrop and his friends know (she was catfished on the fruit farms by one of them) who is hopefully going to study medicine at University.

As I said in my statement, thanks to Dr Harrop she’s not applied to a single English institution. But that was redacted.

I'm so sorry

Women are actively trained like this not to come forward or stand up to abusive treatment, the process punishes and re abuses all over again. This is appalling to read.

It's amazing, isn't it? AH parading around endorsing the spraying to chemicals on women for their views. Even as his/her/furry actions are under review.

Yet, women have to tread so carefully as we don't have the deodorant of being male.

I am sorry Witness E. I wonder though if you should be posting this before the outcome is known? (IANAL, just concerned)

I am really sorry, E.