Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

The Women's Institute and inclusivity

58 replies

GloGirl · 17/11/2021 10:44

In March the WI updated their Equality, Diversity and Inclusion policies, which makes for interesting reading.

The Women's Institute is the the UK’s largest women’s membership organisation so a fairly important voice in campaigning for women and supporting them. So, it was difficult to read that the WI "called in trans education charity Gendered Intelligence to help draft the section on transgender members in the new Equality, Diversity and Inclusion policy".

www.thewi.org.uk/about-us/wi-key-messages/equality-diversity-inclusion-policy

This might explains why anyone reading the WI's Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Glossary of Terms could see definitions for the words:

Agender, Ally, Cisgender, Gender expression, Gender fluid, Gender identity, GRC, Non-binary, Transitioning

But there are no written definitions for Lesbian or Bi-sexual .

Bi-Gender of course, is defined.

(if you were wondering, the word Gay is defined as a man who has a romantic and/or sexual orientation towards men .)

Anyone visiting a WI, would think that inclusion policies based on race, disability or ageism might be the most appropriate topics to spend time getting right. It is a predominantly white charity with a lot of elderly and infirm members. I'm enormously proud of the WI and our members. Warm, welcoming, campaigning - the whole bunch. Many campaigns have started in grass roots WIs such as Keep Britain Tidy.

I'm deeply upset to read of the brief sentence given to breastfeeding mums in their document, but paragraphs devoted to transgender members.

But I am mostly furious at the disregard given to lesbian and bisexual members who only have a small paragraph in the Inclusivity policy and are not even graced with being defined in the Glossary.

OP posts:
PaleGreenGhost · 17/11/2021 12:35

It amazes is me that gendered intelligence can be so nakedly misogynist and get away with it. Except of course it shouldn't. It's the same old shit women have been dealing with for centuries.

I've seen them pop up on MN before a few years ago. I'd love someone to explain the thinking behind the exclusion of lesbian from the glossary. And the potentially transphobic definition of "gay".

SnoopsCaliforniaRoll · 17/11/2021 12:30

I had to leave my local WI last year due to this crap - how an organisation with such a proud history of championing the female sex could betray women so badly is heart-breaking. Where are the organisations for women now?

MrsFin · 17/11/2021 12:27

Does anyone know what the Masons' policy is? Isn't that an all male club?🤔
...off to google.

MrsFin · 17/11/2021 12:26

I'm sure GG could give them some good advice on this. We all know how well they've handled the gender/trans issue Grin

WitchButNotTheFunKind · 17/11/2021 12:13

If the welcome in men identifying as women they will get them as what is more affirming than being a member of the WI and the WI will eventually die a death due to this just like Lesbian bars have Sad

KathleenWho · 17/11/2021 12:12

If TW without a GRC are allowed in then they are male. Isn't it discriminatory to exclude other males?

FlibbertyGiblets · 17/11/2021 12:09

The W I have been twaw for a few years now.

The overlooking of lesbians is despicable.

GloGirl · 17/11/2021 10:50

See the attached snippet from July's WI Life magazine where they talk of bringing in Gendered Intelligence to help draft their documentation.

If anyone could help me draft a letter, I will be happy to send it to the National Federation raising these matters. If any other WI member could join me I would appreciate it.

If anyone knows about the legalities of being a sex-exclusionary charity, but also being able to admit members based only on gender, I would be curious to learn more. The document makes it clear that it is not necessary or appropriate to ask for a GRC.

The Women's Institute and inclusivity
OP posts:
Swipe left for the next trending thread