Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Bringing your whole self to work

167 replies

FlyingOink · 14/11/2021 12:13

What are your thoughts on this?

As a lesbian, out at work and highly visible, I like not having to make up a pretend husband if questioned by colleagues.

But does my workplace need to know everything about who I am as a person? Is there any benefit to this?

I think the move towards always-on working, where WFH can bleed over into leisure time, the fact many people work shifts, zero or minimum hours, or casually, and the fact our employers seem to want to own us almost entirely makes the idea that I have to commit to sharing my whole self with them really off-putting.

Also, what do I do with this information about my colleagues? Is it relevant? Where I'd maybe get to know someone as a friend and then learn of their passion for model boats or romantic poetry or the Liberal Democrats, now am I expected to be faced with all of this information and somehow use it?

Is bringing your whole self to work forcing the issue, is it harmless as an idea, what does it mean for various people? And how do you set boundaries around privacy if other people are determined to overshare?

OP posts:
MilitantFawcett · 15/11/2021 16:03

What a timely thread! In a survey today on our Directorate Xmas party the options are “yes I want to help” or “no I don’t want to help because I hate Xmas”. AIBU to question the team on how “inclusive” this is of working parents (but especially mums who carry the mental load let’s be honest) and less extrovert colleagues who might feel pressure to help when it’s really not their thing?

AlfonsoTheUnrepentant · 15/11/2021 15:50

@toomanytrees

However, if people are going to spend eight hours a day with others for a period of years, I would hate to think that they would rather not know whether the other was getting battered at home; or that a loved one was dying; or that their child won a place on the Olympic team.

There is an assumption here is that the default is to tell one's work colleagues about one's trials and tribulations. But many people want privacy while they work through their life's difficulties and sorrows. Work also provides a respite from these.

I agree. If my child had won a place in the Olympics I would tell people at work because I was so proud of them but no way would I ever tell anyone at work my personal problems.
Peanutbutterrules1 · 15/11/2021 15:29

Well yes it’s complicated @BloodinGutters I don’t really want to know the ins and outs of my colleagues lives but am willing to give extra support when needed. But yes you are right, it’s not helpful to know everything about everyone! It’s too much.

BloodinGutters · 15/11/2021 15:18

[quote Peanutbutterrules1]@MultiStorey I agree, i do want to know important stuff and be supportive to work colleagues. I guess it’s just a balance. This stuff always seems to be interpreted as “people must understand everything about me”. Yes I want to support a colleague going through a terrible divorce but I don’t need to know all the details. I can be supportive by making sure work is done or helping them with tasks at difficult times. I like helping people but find it very draining to have to emotionally support them . I can’t do that for friends, family and work ![/quote]
What happens if he’s going through a difficult divorce because she’s finally left him after years of violence and abuse?

I think most people think they’d be happy to support co workers, because they assume coworkers are essential decent humans who think similarly enough to us. But the problem is once people bring their whole self to work we find out that really isn’t true.

There’s lots and lots of situations I wouldn’t be willing to support co workers with if I knew who they really were.

KittenKong · 15/11/2021 15:16

Some people don’t want the world and his colleague knowing their business. And there’s nothing worse than an oversharer who will tell you about every bowel movement of their cat in great detail.

toomanytrees · 15/11/2021 15:11

However, if people are going to spend eight hours a day with others for a period of years, I would hate to think that they would rather not know whether the other was getting battered at home; or that a loved one was dying; or that their child won a place on the Olympic team.

There is an assumption here is that the default is to tell one's work colleagues about one's trials and tribulations. But many people want privacy while they work through their life's difficulties and sorrows. Work also provides a respite from these.

Peanutbutterrules1 · 15/11/2021 14:27

@MultiStorey I agree, i do want to know important stuff and be supportive to work colleagues. I guess it’s just a balance. This stuff always seems to be interpreted as “people must understand everything about me”. Yes I want to support a colleague going through a terrible divorce but I don’t need to know all the details. I can be supportive by making sure work is done or helping them with tasks at difficult times. I like helping people but find it very draining to have to emotionally support them . I can’t do that for friends, family and work !

elastamum · 15/11/2021 13:51

As a recently retired senior director I am quite sure that it was a good thing I did not bring my whole self to work. I was widely considered a great people person and business team leader. In reality I am a middle aged cynic who swears a lot and gives no fucks at all about my organisations roulette wheel of mostly recycled initiatives. I have been around a long time and think I retired just in time!

KittenKong · 15/11/2021 13:20

Ah yes - bringing your ‘right’ person to work...

Leafstamp · 15/11/2021 13:02

@ArcheryAnnie

Like so much of this type of guff, it never means what it says. Too many women have found that bringing their whole self to work, including their beliefs that women have rights, and that same-sex attraction is OK, have got them threatened with the sack.
Totally this.
ArcheryAnnie · 15/11/2021 12:43

Like so much of this type of guff, it never means what it says. Too many women have found that bringing their whole self to work, including their beliefs that women have rights, and that same-sex attraction is OK, have got them threatened with the sack.

MultiStorey · 15/11/2021 12:39

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

KittenKong · 15/11/2021 12:02

I work with a team of extroverts - they never really seem to get/care that I don’t want to sit n chat every single morning about the dogs bowel movements or their social lives. I don’t like talking about myself, and they’d probably find my hobbies pretty boring anyway!

I’m just there to do my job...

Peanutbutterrules1 · 15/11/2021 11:57

I find it exhausting and another example of how the world is geared to extrovert. I don’t have the energy to care about it all. I want to get my work done and work with my colleagues in a professional way. I like hearing about their weekends and general chit chat but don’t need to know everything. I am happy for colleagues to share personal issues with me on a need to know basis but generally I don’t have a lot of interest in their whole selves!!!!! I also don’t want to impose all my shit on others. I come to work to get away from having to emotionally supportive others!

KittenKong · 15/11/2021 11:07

Turn up at the interview dressed as a clown or pantomime horse. Being along your pet pig (support animal) and crack open a bottle of gin (alcoholics have to work too...). Also swear and fart... a lot.

Phew what a relief! And they can’t not give you the job for any of these!

EmbarrassingHadrosaurus · 15/11/2021 11:06

@Toddlerteaplease

My trust says this on job adverts. It just made me laugh.
And we mean it. Except if you need any accommodation for caring responsibilities. Or, say, you need temporary accommodations because you're having chemotherapy even tho' you're keeping up to date with your other duties…
Toddlerteaplease · 15/11/2021 10:51

My trust says this on job adverts. It just made me laugh.

shreddednips · 15/11/2021 10:50

@FlyingOink I agree, I think a lot of this is about getting as much out of employees as possible in terms of their commitment to their jobs, and it's unhealthy. It wouldn't surprise me if the theory is that if work becomes somewhere to socialise, form friendships, and pour absolutely every part of who you are into your role, the lines between work and home become blurred and it becomes harder to detach from work when you need to. That doesn't mean that some of the sentiment behind it isn't worthy, but I think it could really benefit employers to have their employees deeply emotionally bonded to their workplace by encouraging oversharing. Plus, as you say, it's a free way to say that you're prioritising staff well-being.

I feel the same way about the trend for promoting mindfulness in workplaces. I actually think mindfulness is helpful and use aspects of what I learned. But I also found that it gave some employers an excuse to not address causes of stress in the workplace. I remember massively struggling with job-related stress, and my employer at the time was keen to encourage me to practice mindfulness instead of addressing my unmanageable workload.

SenselessUbiquity · 15/11/2021 10:48

Good analogy with being fobbed off with beer and pizza when a crappily organised project means you have to work late to get it done. I don't want cheap beer and pizza at 10pm x nights a month, I want to get my work done in time to leave and have good home made food with friends or family at my own expense. Same with relationships - I don't want faux intimacy at work, i want work to be contained enough within my life to allow me time and resource to develop rewarding personal relationships outside of work.

shreddednips · 15/11/2021 10:37

@FlyingOink

In that particular workplace, I really felt like senior management were keen on this culture of oversharing because it made us quite vulnerable and they liked knowing as much about us as possible. I saw a few times people being encouraged to share information and then becoming the focus of extra scrutiny if it was felt that there was something going on in their personal lives that might take their focus off work.

This is what I was getting at, and it's interesting it was aimed at younger workers. I think young people have poor boundaries around work because they have a poor job market, and are used to crappy contracts/hours/security and non-existent career advancement.

I just hate the idea of David Brent wanting to get into some young employee's psyche so he can instill deep loyalty to ACME Products Ltd or whatever the fuck they were called.

I don't even like "checking in" in group meetings (thankfully we don't do that anymore) because actually if I'm really upset because of a bereavement it's up to me who I tell and why. Likewise if I don't trust the company and feel really dubious about X new initiative. It suits me to keep that quiet, and I should be allowed to without cod psychology probing at my bloody feelings.

This is one of the biggest dangers of this type of policy. Younger employees who don't know the unspoken rules of what and what isn't appropriate to share in a professional environment don't end up learning these boundaries, and even worse, they're actually encouraged to see behaving at work as you might in a social situation with friends as normal or desirable. Disaster when they then move to a new workplace and their behaviour, which was encouraged in their previous job, is seen as unprofessional.

This has made me think of an example of this sort of thing going wrong that I saw in real life. My 'bring your whole self to work'-type setting resulted in people feeling really too relaxed about the topics of conversation in the work kitchen. I can distinctly remember a raucous conversation between a group of work mates about online dating and some of their experiences- not the sort of chat that everyone would want to be forced to listen to while they make a cup of tea. I don't mind hearing it, but I did mind that other people might mind and feel like the staff kitchen wasn't a comfortable place to be. These policies can be really non-inclusive for people who, quite rightly, want to maintain boundaries with their work colleagues.

MilitantFawcett · 15/11/2021 09:30

Being less cynical, perhaps this idea has just had it’s day. It was necessary to get workplaces to a point where personal characteristics don’t matter or impede progression. Normalising difference probably does more to challenge bias than painful yearly training.

Findwen · 15/11/2021 09:27

Does this mean I can finally attend work as my true self ?

On Mondays I am a nudist.
On Tuesdays I do pup play
On Wednesdays I take a vow of silence, this extends to all forms of communication
On Thursdays I need connection to my children so want to bring my three under fives in
On Fridays I observe the sabbeth and will not work.

It looks to be an interesting week, this week.

FlyingOink · 15/11/2021 08:55

@GoodieMoomin

Where does it come from? In my last job it was HR driving it. A lovely but clueless woman of the #BeKind variety, and she got it from the CIPD organisation. But where did they get it...?
There's probably some management theory that suggests the more people lose the distinction between work and their private life, the happier they are to spend more of their day working, or something. I really think the work/life balance is no longer balanced. Maybe for the kind of man who doesn't know his kids and answers emails in the bath through choice, it is actually helpful to be able to impose his personality on his colleagues, but for his wife in her job it's a distraction? Or for the twentysomething in a cheap suit wedded to "grind culture" it makes up for a lack of actual pay and free time? From what I hear of some tech workplaces, eg video game development, the perks like a gym or free doughnuts etc fail to make up for the 60-80 hour weeks and lack of advancement. But what's cheaper for the employer? Cod psychology and doughnuts or fair pay and career progression?
OP posts:
FlyingOink · 15/11/2021 08:44

I just want to be judged on how I do my job

See, that to me sounds much more fair.

OP posts:
MilitantFawcett · 15/11/2021 08:02

@GoodieMoomin

Where does it come from? In my last job it was HR driving it. A lovely but clueless woman of the #BeKind variety, and she got it from the CIPD organisation. But where did they get it...?
I don’t know but I distinctly remember my old Perm Sec (Claire Moriarty) driving it in my Dept. In some ways it’s been helpful to discussion though as I’m hearing more and more people saying “this is bollocks, I just want to be judged on how I do my job”.