Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Why aren’t binders a regulated medical device?

91 replies

everythingthelighttouches · 14/11/2021 11:34

I’m just getting my head around this and wondering if there is recourse via MHRA.

Anyone looked into this?

Definition according to government website:

www.gov.uk/guidance/medical-devices-how-to-comply-with-the-legal-requirements

“ Definition of a medical device
You need to decide if your product is a medical device before you go through the compliance process.

According to the Medical Devices Regulations 2002 (SI 2002 No 618, as amended) (UK MDR 2002), a medical device is described as any instrument, apparatus, appliance, software, material or other article, whether used alone or in combination, together with any accessories, including the software intended by its manufacturer to be used specifically for diagnosis or therapeutic purposes or both and necessary for its proper application, which is intended by the manufacturer to be used for human beings for the purpose of:

diagnosis, prevention, monitoring, treatment or alleviation of disease
diagnosis, monitoring, treatment, alleviation of or compensation for an injury or handicap
investigation, replacement or modification of the anatomy or of a physiological process, or
control of conception”

Email address for reporting non-compliance n the link below. What I’m not sure of is whether selling an item which should be regulated but is not is non-compliance??? e.g.Lush

www.gov.uk/government/publications/report-a-non-compliant-medical-device-enforcement-process/report-a-non-compliant-or-suspected-counterfeit-medical-device

Is there recourse through general consumer act or something?

OP posts:
ArabellaScott · 15/11/2021 07:56

I think questions need to be raised and those involved in child safeguarding need to be aware of all the potential risks. How many companies make binders? Are they all vigorously tested to make sure they're not going to cause the most serious damage?

Perhaps if they had to be prescription doctors could assess and prescribe better types or some of the other types with fewer side effects? And monitor their patient's health.

I'm sure teachers would welcome guidance, doctors and families too. How does one go about asking for NHS guidance into something like this? I think am awareness campaign on the possible dangers/harms and ways to avoid would be good too.

Bordois · 15/11/2021 07:50

@anaily

Convince you of what? I don't need your permission or approval. My body my choice. It's harmful with your silly approach. Under 18 i personally think it should be with parental supervision rather than diy, so properly fitting. I have a dull ache on my left side and it hurts when i breath because i wore it over night. That might happen more when you try to ban it and drive it underground with DIY methods. Rather than going against the group you want to ""protect"" maybe engage with us. You have 2 ears and 1 mouth, use that ratio.
So you agree that binders, especially when being used by children, should be subject to rigorous safety testing and fitness for use, and fitted properly to ensure they do no damage to a child's body or cause pain or long term issues?
Motorina · 15/11/2021 07:35

I find it hard to believe we are being told Binders are perfectly safe and described as ‘shapewear’, including high heels, by one poster.

I didn’t describe them as ‘perfectly safe’. I described them as no more harmful than some of the stupid things I wore as a teen, one of which I noted left me with a permanent dicky ankle. The list of harms from heels (ankle damage, bunions, shortened achilles, distorted toes, foot pain, blisters…) is greater than anything I have seen from binders. But we don’t ban those.

I also noted that it would be hard to distinguish in law between garments which smoosh the breasts down and those that use wires and padding to smoosh them up. Both are distorting the breasts for aesthetics. Having worn both, the latter is substantially less comfortable. The latter are also associated with injuries.

I don’t like binders. But I don’t like them because I see them as a ‘gateway drug’ to medical transition, which emphatically is harmful to teens. I think what lush is doing is appalling, because they’re going behind parents backs.

But I think trying to get them banned as a medical device is a hiding to nothing. Particularly as the more lightly regulated medical devices (bandages, splints, pulse oximetres) are freely available for kids to buy, anyway.

Helleofabore · 15/11/2021 05:33

Harmless? And because you wore it too long you now suffer pain? Do You understand that pain is your bodies way of telling you that binding your breasts is the very opposite of ‘harmless’?

You are an adult. You make your own choices. But you cannot deny that no person under the age of 18 should be using them, parental supervision or not. The study that shows binding impedes breathing are clear.

When is it a suitable time of day/week for a child to impede their breathing? To restrict their movements because of what they are wearing?

I find it hard to believe we are being told Binders are perfectly safe and described as ‘shapewear’, including high heels, by one poster. Told that another has worn theirs for too long in one stint and is suffering pain. While both posters are declaring that those that oppose under 18 year old females wearing binders are just ignorant because people will just do it anyway.

How dare any adult try to stop their child making decisions that may cause them to permanently harm themselves? How dare any adult seek to try and address the root of the issue in the first place - the need to do it?

NotBadConsidering · 15/11/2021 04:10

Breast ironing (my bold):

www.safeguardingcambspeterborough.org.uk/children-board/professionals/procedures/breast-ironing/

2. Definition

“The United Nations (UN) states that Breast Ironing affects 3.8 million women around the world and has been identified as one of the five under-reported crimes relating to gender-based violence. The custom uses large stones, a hammer or spatulas that have been heated over scorching coals to compress the breast tissue of girls as young as 9 years old. Those who derive from richer families may opt to use an elastic belt to press the breasts so as to prevent them from growing.”

“The mutilation is a traditional practice from Cameroon designed to make teenage girls look less ‘womanly’ and to deter unwanted male attention, pregnancy and rape. The practice is commonly performed by family members, 58% of the time by the mother. In many cases the abuser thinks they are doing something good for their daughter, by delaying the effects of puberty so that she can continue her education, rather than getting married.”

Why is it abuse if the breasts of a Cameroonian girl are bound, but celebrated if the breasts of a gender non-conforming girl are bound?

FlyingOink · 15/11/2021 00:24

I have a dull ache on my left side and it hurts when i breath because i wore it over night.

Is that with a commercial binder? If so, how does this follow, logically:
That might happen more when you try to ban it and drive it underground with DIY methods.

Because what you're saying is that you're an adult with the "proper kit" and you have still managed to injure yourself and you don't follow your own advice.
What about your statement will make anyone think a child would do better than you have?

FlyingOink · 15/11/2021 00:21

Ace bandages (which are designed to constrict, so as you breathe, they get tighter and tighter)
How does this work? They're just stretchy bandages, how do they tighten themselves?

Ace is a US brand name, I see they're available on amazon etc here now. But these kinds of bandages have been available for years. Do they only self-tighten if placed on the torso? I've used them elsewhere and never noticed this phenomenon.

ArabellaScott · 14/11/2021 23:00

Grin Right you are, ducks.

anaily · 14/11/2021 22:37

Convince you of what? I don't need your permission or approval. My body my choice. It's harmful with your silly approach. Under 18 i personally think it should be with parental supervision rather than diy, so properly fitting. I have a dull ache on my left side and it hurts when i breath because i wore it over night. That might happen more when you try to ban it and drive it underground with DIY methods. Rather than going against the group you want to ""protect"" maybe engage with us. You have 2 ears and 1 mouth, use that ratio.

ArabellaScott · 14/11/2021 22:24

I've listened to you. I am not convinced.

Binders are clearly harmful.

Children and those under 18 should not be getting them handed out with their glittery unicorn bath bombs.

anaily · 14/11/2021 22:11

@everythingthelighttouches

“ A good quality binder worn correctly is not a health risk.”

How do you know???
It hasn’t been tested.

“You don't see the pros but heavily focus on the cons”
What are the pros?? How do you know??

Pros= Changes my appearance to my preference = stupid fashion item

OR
Pros= Necessary to improve the mental health of vulnerable people, despite the physical harm = should be tested and regulated.

There is a difference between a fashion item (see high heels, corsets as someone mentioned) and something that is designed and marketed to have therapeutic benefit.

People will always find ways to do something but that doesn’t mean it should be marketed as having a benefit.

That is irresponsible, misleading and taking advantage of a vulnerable group (the group who are in need of the therapeutic benefit).

The reason that we have a medicines regulatory authority in the U.K. is to protect patients and consumers.

Don’t people who believe that a binder is offering them some therapeutic benefit deserve to have that rigorously tested ?

and proven to 1) be safe 2) actually offer the benefit it is purporting to have???

If not, then it is just a fashion item…

If no benefit then manufacturers, retailers, trans charities, institutions (including NICE and the NHS) should not be putting any misinformation out there that implies any kind of health (mental or physical) benefit whatsoever.

Oh, and generally we don’t try to sell high heels and corsets to children.

Because it is damaging to their bodies.

How do i know? Errrr i wear them at times. Do you? Pros: makes me feel comfortable in myself, gives me confidence, my body my choice. I follow someone on social media that binds, it's very obvious when they don't wear a binder. It's our individual choice and we have our reasons for wearing them. You talk about "a group" and want to dictate your opinion on to that group without ever listening to that very group.
snekkes · 14/11/2021 22:08

People on here seem to think that a binder squeezes DDcups completely flat. That’s completely unrealistic.

^ This. E cups for sure will not be flat. (But it's entirely possible to have a great result from top surgery after five years of responsbily wearing a high quality binder to lessen the appearance of E cups.)

BloodinGutters · 14/11/2021 21:33

@Itsanewdah

The funny thing is that a group of people who have never seen or worn a binder are discussing them…. And at the same time normalization objectively damaging body shaping devices that they deem to be appropriate and are commonly worn by under 18 year olds. A short reality check: Good binders are expensive. Mine are £40 a piece. You generally need a credit card to buy one. The chance that an 11 year old manages to buy one and wear it nonstop ( as implied above) is laughable and would need some seriously unengaged parents (they are binders! Its bloody obvious if you wear one!). Good ones allow you to breath just fine - its the cheapos via amazon that can be trouble, or ace bandages etc (trans tape is fine, but you can’t get it in the uk). Binders also don’t have and claims attached - apart from flattening your chest. Same as bras really, just that bras promise bigger chests or support while being active. They also don’t promise or provide a completely flat chest. Depending on cup size, that’s just not possible. I have a small b cup, my binder gives my a flat chest. Anything bigger - its flatter, not but not completely flat. People on here seem to think that a binder squeezes DDcups completely flat. That’s completely unrealistic.
11 year olds can arrange to get them from lush.

If they are only just developing then it wouldn’t be obvious under baggy clothing at all.

Breasts aren’t just random lumps of fat. They are organs designed to make milk for infants. It isn’t just flattening thighs, it’s compressing an organ and that causes long term damage. According to the nhs there is serious risks associated with wearing them and they won’t endorse them.

Mother’s can care about issues that impact our children’s safety and well-being.

Helleofabore · 14/11/2021 21:27

The funny thing is that a group of people who have never seen or worn a binder are discussing them….

Oh. This again.

And yet, many of us are parents of teenagers who this is entirely relevant to.

Again, crack on doing what you want. Stop making out this is harmless.

And stop trying to ‘shame’ people, parents included, from discussing the harms here.

ArabellaScott · 14/11/2021 21:25

The funny thing is that a group of people who have never seen or worn a binder are discussing them….

A reality check? Oh, good lord.

I'm also concerned about FGM, despite not having experienced it myself. And child marriage, and unnecessary circumcision. This is 'mumsnet'; I find it really odd that you are surprised that mothers are concerned about potentially harmful practises among young people.

ArabellaScott · 14/11/2021 21:21

@snekkes

*Actually that large scale study showed DIY binding was less harmful than binders, iirc.*

Regardless of what the large scale study says, in practise this is laughable. Surely you can see that a properly fitted binder is way less harmful than duct tape or Ace bandages (which are designed to constrict, so as you breathe, they get tighter and tighter).

I prefer to use the most reliable evidence possible. So I'd say that was the peer reviewed study.

I mean, a binder is obviously also designed to constrict. That is how you flatten a breast. There is no other way to make tissue take up less space or be less prominent than by constriction.

I would definitely like to see some NHS/Nice guidelines, though. That would seem sensible.

Itsanewdah · 14/11/2021 21:18

The funny thing is that a group of people who have never seen or worn a binder are discussing them….
And at the same time normalization objectively damaging body shaping devices that they deem to be appropriate and are commonly worn by under 18 year olds.
A short reality check:
Good binders are expensive. Mine are £40 a piece. You generally need a credit card to buy one. The chance that an 11 year old manages to buy one and wear it nonstop ( as implied above) is laughable and would need some seriously unengaged parents (they are binders! Its bloody obvious if you wear one!). Good ones allow you to breath just fine - its the cheapos via amazon that can be trouble, or ace bandages etc (trans tape is fine, but you can’t get it in the uk).
Binders also don’t have and claims attached - apart from flattening your chest. Same as bras really, just that bras promise bigger chests or support while being active.
They also don’t promise or provide a completely flat chest. Depending on cup size, that’s just not possible. I have a small b cup, my binder gives my a flat chest. Anything bigger - its flatter, not but not completely flat. People on here seem to think that a binder squeezes DDcups completely flat. That’s completely unrealistic.

everythingthelighttouches · 14/11/2021 20:53

Auntycorruption

Brilliant, so glad you are looking into this.

what is the mechanism by which someone can report false health claims being made?

What powers, if any, does MHRA have to prevent or stop such products being on the market or claims being made?

OP posts:
snekkes · 14/11/2021 20:41

Actually that large scale study showed DIY binding was less harmful than binders, iirc.

Regardless of what the large scale study says, in practise this is laughable. Surely you can see that a properly fitted binder is way less harmful than duct tape or Ace bandages (which are designed to constrict, so as you breathe, they get tighter and tighter).

ArabellaScott · 14/11/2021 20:30

Oh, fab, thanks Embarrassing!

EmbarrassingHadrosaurus · 14/11/2021 20:28

Arabella's link

Here's the study on health effects of binding.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27300085/

Peitzmeier S, Gardner I, Weinand J, Corbet A, Acevedo K. Health impact of chest binding among transgender adults: a community-engaged, cross-sectional study. Cult Health Sex. 2017 Jan;19(1):64-75. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2016.1191675. Epub 2016 Jun 14. PMID: 27300085.

is available to read free to access here:

cabinradio.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Health-impact-of-chest-binding-among-transgender-adults-a-community-engaged-cross-sectional-study.pdf

ArabellaScott · 14/11/2021 20:23

Fab, Aunty. I'll be really interested to hear your thougths.

ArabellaScott · 14/11/2021 20:22

Binding is mentioned on this site about FGM, on the page about breast flattening.

'some adolescent girls and boys may choose to bind their breast using constrictive material due to gender transformation or identity, and this may also cause health problems.'

nationalfgmcentre.org.uk/breast-flattening/

Auntycorruption · 14/11/2021 20:18

I work in medical device regulation.

It's an interesting thought.

It is down to the manufacturer to determine if a product classes as a medical device or not with regards the claims they make about how it should be used and what it does. However they shouldn't be disingenuous and can't advertise claims which are not supported by data. Devices are put into different categories depended how high risk they are - simple bandages are Class 1 where manufacturers can self certify to get a CE/UKCA mark with little clinical evidence. How would you differentiate a binder from a bandage? It's all down to the way it is described by the manufacturer.

Unfortunately medical device regulation in the U.K. has fallen behind that in the EU at the moment. But MHRA are keen not to be seen as a lightweight.

I haven't looked into where binders can be bought before and what the product descriptions are. I'll have a look tomorrow and feedback.

Helleofabore · 14/11/2021 20:02

I would also like to see the negative effects be very clearly stated and not hidden in search engine results.

No, they are not ‘just like corsets’ or ‘sports bras’ unless you are buying corsets or sports bra that are ‘binders’.

And spreading the misinformation about them being safe is very dangerous.

How about instead of supporting their use, young females under the age of 18 are counseled about accepting their body even with gender dysphoria. After all, why are females who identify as males having to replicate a stereotyped male body? And before you tell us all about how they hate their bodies, why are trans people encouraged to hate their bodies. Why is this acceptable?

And yeah, I hated my female body as a teenager and suffer body dysmorphia even now. So, please tell us why exactly and then why gender dysphoria no longer is defined by stereotypes yet young girls are using those stereotypes to define their needs for binders.

And frankly, as on the other threads, just because people are going to do it anyway is no reason to not regulate binder usage to over 18.

If you as an adult are fully conversant with the effects and still do it, crack on. But don’t ever try to argue that under 18 females should be using them.

Swipe left for the next trending thread