Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

School not using "girl" and "boy"

157 replies

Personwithrage · 10/11/2021 08:42

My year 7 DC had a session on puberty in RHSE yesterday. As part of this they labelled diagrams of "people with penises" and "people with vaginas" so as to "not make transgender people uncomfortable" as someone could be "born a boy but believe their personality makes them a girl".

I am so so cross.

I don't have a gender identity, absolutely and wholeheartedly reject regressive stereotypes and have brought DC up to challenge them and to believe they can do and be whoever they want to be. I have also always talked about biological reality and believe that whatever you do, say, wear or think you are still a boy or girl as defined by your biology.

Am I over reacting? Is it unreasonable and excluding to expect puberty lessons to refer to male and female, boy and girl? Is it not ok for my child to refer to themselves in terms they're comfortable with? Are there really lots of 11 year olds with gender dysphoria and a sense of gender identity such that this rings true?

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
MrsOvertonsWindow · 15/11/2021 10:43

The problem is the DfE guidelines are fairly 'mild'. This government are trying to roll back what they have actively promoted for the last decade without seeming to be accountable for what they've enabled. I've seen appalling letters from tory ministers like Nick Gibb & Damian Hinds completely ignoring questions from women about safeguarding children and instead droning on about how wonderfully inclusive they find mixed sex facilities for children.

The government are never going to admit that they've funded unsuitable organisations to persuade schools to remove parental rights, celebrate drugs and surgery for teenagers, sell age inappropriate concepts to young children and remove children's boundaries and right to say no. So the roll back will happen at snail's pace to try to avoid drawing the attention of the deranged activists (just look at their hysterics at the bbc at the moment).

Personwithrage · 15/11/2021 08:51

Imagine being a teacher who is concerned at this. Concerned that safeguarding isn't being prioritised for the children they are working with. Concerned that their school has a curriculum and lesson plans that directly goes against explicit DfE guidance. Concerned that children with a range of protected characteristics are being placed second to an ideology that seeks to be first and foremost in every context. And they're not able to speak up, speak out, challenge or refuse.

Absolutely chilling.

OP posts:
HipTightOnions · 14/11/2021 23:05

Thanks MrsOvertonsWindow.

I don’t blame you for being cross, it’s utterly enraging.

MrsOvertonsWindow · 14/11/2021 22:44

@HipTightOnions

It's also why parental challenge is so important. If teachers are in hock to activist groups rather than centring children's needs, then parents are going to have to stand up and insist that children come first and not the wishes of self interested adults.

It’s also because in many schools parents are listened to while teachers are not.

We’re not all “self interested adults” who are “in hock to activist groups rather than centring children’s needs”.

My apologies HipTightOnions. I do know that the majority of teachers centre children and so many are quietly concerned at this. My language was careless (and cross). I'd looked at the DfE equality guidance which some of us have been complaining about to MPs etc for years and was enraged to see that it still hasn't been changed and pushes teachers in the directions of these unsuitable organisations.
HipTightOnions · 14/11/2021 22:36

It's also why parental challenge is so important. If teachers are in hock to activist groups rather than centring children's needs, then parents are going to have to stand up and insist that children come first and not the wishes of self interested adults.

It’s also because in many schools parents are listened to while teachers are not.

We’re not all “self interested adults” who are “in hock to activist groups rather than centring children’s needs”.

Personwithrage · 14/11/2021 21:02

Thank you @2fallsfromSSA.

I feel really strongly about this now. I'm not just going to shuffle off.

Finding that the school think they're doing the right thing by using resources from Brook, then seeing what Brook actually say has really shocked me.

OP posts:
2fallsfromSSA · 14/11/2021 19:35

Just seen this thread. Well done for writing/challenging.

The DfE us to blame for much of this. They refuse to accept responsibility. Their relationship with stonewall has influenced them greatly. They say it's not their job to police resources etc and it's up to individual schools. We are fully aware that it's a problem. And it's why it's also important for parents to challenge schools. And if appropriate write to EHRC and the education minister: safeschoolsallianceuk.net/2021/10/23/write-to-the-ehrc-you-can-make-a-difference/

Personwithrage · 14/11/2021 19:02

It seems that the DfE need to come out with real leadership and clarity in this.

It would make a huge difference!

OP posts:
MrsOvertonsWindow · 14/11/2021 17:26

That's very depressing MsGoodenough It's why we need the DfE to start righting the wrongs that they've caused with their lack of due diligence.
It's also why parental challenge is so important. If teachers are in hock to activist groups rather than centring children's needs, then parents are going to have to stand up and insist that children come first and not the wishes of self interested adults. Angry

Personwithrage · 14/11/2021 17:21

Oh no @msgoodenough. As I've mentioned them all in my correspondence, maybe I'll just be dismissed as a transphobe . So frustrating.

OP posts:
MsGoodenough · 14/11/2021 16:14

I agree the DfE could be more proactive. They can't check every resource out there but they could check the big ones such as Brooke, PSHE Association and Jigsaw.

I am feeling pretty despairing at the ideological capture of PSHE teachers as I'm on some PSHE teacher FB groups and there was recently a thread where all the teachers apart from me agreed that SSA, Transgender Trend and Genspect were transphobic and should be ignored. Every group that talks sense is branded transphobic and then dismissed.

(I am ValancyRedfern BTW. Due to forgetting passwords I've got different accounts on different devices right now).

BelleOfTheProvince · 14/11/2021 15:59

I think the wider culture of Ofsted and the DfE promoting unrealistic expectations has been a big factor in this. Due to the implementation of such policies, outsourcing culture has been positively encouraged. And leaving the school responsible for checking companies that are all but endorsed by the DfE and Ofsted is not fair, considering most teachers are now meant to lead a subject, often not even put of their nqt year. Teachers are not paid for this leadership, nor is it part of the teaching standards until you are on leadership pay scale, so it's no wonder it's not been given due care and attention.

I personally think it's a scandal this ideology has been allowed to take root in schools, but it is hard to challenge because doing so creates more work for teachers. Haven't been able to wrest it out of my partner's school entirely because of workload related push back and lack of alternative resources or schemes.

Even those that know something has been up, like my partner, are reluctant to go against stonewall because it's seen as a legitimate consulting agency, not a lobby group.
Ofsted and DfE behaviour have contributed to that lack of clarity.

MrsOvertonsWindow · 14/11/2021 15:51

I agree that schools have been misled. The 2018 Equality Act guidance

( statutory guidance that schools must use) prioritises gender reassignment over all the other characteristics! It gives specific links to GIREs and Stonewall - no other activist lobby groups are mentioned at all - the only other links are government websites.
So since 2018, schools have been getting dire advice in the key Equality At guidance, from inappropriate adult groups pushing queer theory ideology at schools, all enabled by the captured civil servants in the DfE.

It's the Denton's playbook in actions. And with all the unions also dancing to the queer theorist's tune, prioritising child safeguarding and the wellbeing of children is taking second place to the demands of these groups.

Personwithrage · 14/11/2021 15:20

Yes @whatisheupto! I agree, really helped me to ponder this! Like the Brook website talking about "breasts if your dominant hormone is oestrogen," it all relies on someone having used plain language to lay the foundations of your understanding prior to this ideology sweeping in to confuse and bamboozle you.

Imagine just having to wonder which is your dominant hormone? And wondering whether that means you have breasts or chest?

OP posts:
whatisheupto · 14/11/2021 15:11

@HipTightOnions
"And how do the “people with vaginas” know that they have vaginas?

This brainless PSHE teacher is relying on the fact that someone else has at some point told them that they are, indeed, girls."

Oh, this is wonderful. Thank you!

BloodinGutters · 14/11/2021 15:08

@Personwithrage

From what I've read over the last couple of days - SSA, transgender trend and genspect, I would be so worried if I was working in a school right now. Having to go along with something so clearly shown to be against norms of safeguarding, disadvantaging children who already disadvantaged by using language, ideas and concepts that are confusing and intimidating because on the one hand you're being told to, but on the other hand it's being made clear that responsibility has to be taken somewhere.
They don’t have to go along with it though. They just have to point out it breeches dfe guidance. Or whichever law it breaks if it’s toilets etc. They don’t need to bring it up as their opinion, just point out guidance/laws/safeguarding duty.
Personwithrage · 14/11/2021 15:06

From what I've read over the last couple of days - SSA, transgender trend and genspect, I would be so worried if I was working in a school right now. Having to go along with something so clearly shown to be against norms of safeguarding, disadvantaging children who already disadvantaged by using language, ideas and concepts that are confusing and intimidating because on the one hand you're being told to, but on the other hand it's being made clear that responsibility has to be taken somewhere.

OP posts:
BloodinGutters · 14/11/2021 15:02

@BelleOfTheProvince

Yes, I agree schools have been fairly useless. But I do think that they have been misled and that there will soon be a u turn so people following in good faith will be punished whilst those who pushed it into schools in the first place get away Scot free.
I don’t think the pshe guidance is misleading. It’s vague and somewhat contradictory, but if parents can read the part that says the dfe do not endorse resources and that schools must be responsible for checking them teachers can certainly read that.

I think it shows up how many teachers don’t read the guidance. I’ve found that true of a lot of guidance and the education act and schools own policies. I appreciate that for teachers or teaching assistants it isn’t as easy to be on top of this with everything they have to do, but I’ve found ht, academy seniors, dsl etc completely blind sighted that I know the policies/guidance/education act/equality laws etc, and that’s very scary that they are clueless on this. All of which we’re outstanding of good schools btw, including some that are named on everyone’s invited. So I’m inclined to think they need marked harshly. They may need more support put in place to go with that but not knowing dfe guidance isn’t something that can be overlooked, even without the glaring safeguarding fails it leads to.

BelleOfTheProvince · 14/11/2021 14:53

Yes, I agree schools have been fairly useless.
But I do think that they have been misled and that there will soon be a u turn so people following in good faith will be punished whilst those who pushed it into schools in the first place get away Scot free.

BloodinGutters · 14/11/2021 14:41

@BelleOfTheProvince

From what parents post here repeatedly it sounds like even when parents show schools the guidance and the laws and all the ssa etc resources, plenty schools still turn round and tell parents they won’t fix it.

Without ofsted assessing them what other power do parents have to ensure schools follow dfe guidance and our countries laws?

The number of schools I’ve seen or read about with mixed sex toilets who refuse to follow building regulations act or equality act and safeguarding guidance is horrifying. The only option when they ignore parents complaints is ofsted.

BelleOfTheProvince · 14/11/2021 14:36

Many schools have been warned they may lose their 'outstanding status'. This and the u turn on core subjects, assessment for learning and other key areas mean that they'll happily find lots of fault in the schools and teachers who don't keep up with the merry-go-round of teaching trends.

This is a very serious but wider symptom of how Ofsted, which is meant to be a guiding hand, is failing schools and creating more problems than it solves.

BloodinGutters · 14/11/2021 14:27

As are stonewall in the resources section, despite the guidance being updated to get them out of schools.

But I don’t think there would be any response past the one ssa got from them at the moment.

Reportedly the dfe are on the list expected to leave stonewall, was reportedly in telegraph recently. And reportedly the new education secretary is well aware of the problems with stonewall and gender ideology, so if that’s correct then when the guidance is due to be reviewed again (is 3yrly I think, so in a yr & half would be due) he’ll hopefully tighten this up more.

Personwithrage · 14/11/2021 14:22

@BloodinGutters.

I do understand that and they could never possibly cover everything. But it just seems so wrong that these large and well known organisations can position themselves as advisors and sources of learning materials when they so clearly don't comply with the DfE guidance.

And it just seems so contradictory for DfE to set out their standards (which I agree with and am grateful for their clarity) but at the same time for them to link to and give as examples of resources, materials and organisations that do not meet those standards. SSA and Transgender Trend highlight issues with the PSHE Association for eg and yet they are linked to the in the DfE resources section.

Seems a bit unfair on schools really.

OP posts:
BloodinGutters · 14/11/2021 14:10

[quote Personwithrage]@ValancyRedfern I was wondering about asking the DfE their opinion on Brook and their compliance with DfE guidance. I think DfE need to be clearer about which exeternal organisations they don't think schools should work with based on their inability to meet the criteria they specific "factual, evidence based" etc.[/quote]
Have you seen the letter on ssa from dfe? It explains why they can’t check the organisations on their resources section. Which is why they say schools must check them.

I think it’s fair to complain to them after schools, but I don’t think they’d ever be in a position to check every free resource and ensure they comply with the updated guidance at all times. So they would probably always say it’s schools responsibility.

Personwithrage · 14/11/2021 14:08

@ValancyRedfern I was wondering about asking the DfE their opinion on Brook and their compliance with DfE guidance. I think DfE need to be clearer about which exeternal organisations they don't think schools should work with based on their inability to meet the criteria they specific "factual, evidence based" etc.

OP posts: