Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Margaret Atwood

567 replies

MummBRaaarrrTheEverLeaking · 19/10/2021 14:22

twitter.com/MargaretAtwood/status/1450429768067846145?t=8q-A8MlvzZsx6pt4Vu1_LA&s=19

Has retweeted an article from the Toronto Star "why can't we say woman anymore" and bloody hell are they coming for the latest witch burning in the comments!

Ranging from disappointment to the usual sweary abuse. I thought oh how long till the capitulation begins, turns out I didn't have to wait long!

She's following it up with retweets about 'we can say people when it's accurate and inclusive' and then defending the article because the writer isn't "a terf"???

Not really sure what she's trying to achieve here, anyone?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
19
ThumbWitchesAbroad · 24/10/2021 11:45

@EmbarrassingHadrosaurus - that's just one example. If you go on her Twitter thread, you will see numerous other appeasements, including her promoting Shon Faye's book.
She is not standing for women.

Vanishun · 24/10/2021 11:42

I don't think I can feel so lenient. She's active online. No matter where she lives or what her age is, she has no excuse whatsoever for buying into uncritical "terfs vs trans" stuff.

She joined the mob against JK Rowling which says it all: Jo's letter could not have been more reasonable or spelled out the issues any simpler.

Datun · 24/10/2021 11:39

I can't imagine what it is like in a country that doesn't report on trans issues. We have the Daily Mail, the Telegraph, and the Times, all alerting people to the problems. You can't fail to be aware of the negative implications. So much so that quite a few btl comments are along the lines of stop shoving this down our throats.

But yes, I agree that the abuse of an 80-year-old woman for asking questions is absolutely disgusting.

The only possible upside is if it gives her pause for thought. But even then, she's going to get absolutely targeted.

The Canadian authorities should be waking up to the maliciousness and violence behind this.

EmbarrassingHadrosaurus · 24/10/2021 11:38

@ThumbWitchesAbroad

She's a lost cause, sorry.
I don't read that the same way. She seems to be surprised that other people aren't accepting her own assessment of her allyship, possibly because, in Vaclav Havel terms, she didn't understand quite what it was she was abdicating by signing up to the ideology.
FindTheTruth · 24/10/2021 11:37

I think she needs to get off twitter, reach out to feminists and listen.

KittenKong · 24/10/2021 11:33

Please don’t eat me! Please don’t eat me!

ThumbWitchesAbroad · 24/10/2021 11:28

She's a lost cause, sorry.

Margaret Atwood
beastlyslumber · 24/10/2021 11:20

Ah yes, she may be using a blocker.

Good point too about the other writers. She won't be getting any support from them. If anything, the opposite. They'll be part of the pile on (as she was for JKR).

EmbarrassingHadrosaurus · 24/10/2021 11:19

It's because TRAs are abusing and gaslighting her. And she has isolated herself from the women who want to support her. It is just horrible to see.

Do you think she's using a blocker so literally can't see the supportive comments?

But, the other issue is that it's difficult to support someone with whom you have no overlap (e.g., culture, faith, an occupation or activity). Atwood is isolated from fellow successful writers like JKR with whom she has that activity in common.

beastlyslumber · 24/10/2021 11:13

I'm starting to find this quite upsetting. Atwood cringing and groveling for scraps from TRAs, desperate to please and appease them. She's an 80 year old women, one of the world's most successful writers, and if anyone has earned the right to her voice, it's she. So why is she acting like a dog that's being kicked?

I know why. It's because TRAs are abusing and gaslighting her. And she has isolated herself from the women who want to support her. It is just horrible to see.

WarriorN · 24/10/2021 11:09

It strikes me that she's still only operating / reading within an echo chamber.

EmbarrassingHadrosaurus · 24/10/2021 11:06

@MedusasBadHairDay

I think we're still a long way off that. She's still desperately trying to distance herself from the ones she's been told are evil
She has a journey ahead of her but absent a grovelling self-abasement session and re-education there is no redemption on offer from a particular community.

Atwood has an opportunity to be a cooler within her own community. She's already done it to some extent.

She's probably not in a place where she would accept more than tokens of support on offer from those whom she disdains. But, it would still serve her well to read Joyce and consider what it is that she would reject.

WarriorN · 24/10/2021 11:04

She's recommending Shon Faye's book but not Joyce's... hmm

ferretface · 24/10/2021 11:01

She's deviated from the orthodoxy now, there will be no redemption. She'll realise soon enough that even what she deems as a moderate middle ground is under attack.

Beamur · 24/10/2021 10:34

I wonder what will happen when she realises that most of the people she's been told are terfs are in fact the middle ground.

MedusasBadHairDay · 24/10/2021 10:29

I think we're still a long way off that. She's still desperately trying to distance herself from the ones she's been told are evil

EmbarrassingHadrosaurus · 24/10/2021 10:24

@FindTheTruth

she's at the stage where she thinks she's the first person to put forward a reasonable argument and if only other women had been less mean and bigoted we'd have got our points across and solved all this. I don't think she's quite reached the stage where she realises that anyone who dares speak up, no matter how reasonably and kindly, will be labelled a witch and burned at the stake.

Yup, this is what's happening to individuals constantly, snowballing into swathes of populations.

It's a shame that no North American publishers would publish Helen Joyce's book. Atwood would still benefit from reading Joyce's book even if it is UK-centric. MA would also learn something from a chat with her or watching one of the many chats/interviews she's done.

I wonder what it would take for MA to want to phone JKR?

1Week · 24/10/2021 10:14

Sorry ^ talking about Laura Bates there.

1Week · 24/10/2021 10:13

I'd say she just tried not to kick the hornets nest.
Probably just tried to duck it in order to get her central message out

WhiskyXray · 24/10/2021 10:13

I don't think she's thinking clearly at all. She tweeted,

So I got attacked for a while from "the other side" for Tweeting pro-trans rights... maybe the two sides should consider their common opponents: those who hate all kinds of women?

That's such a diabolical mischaracterisation of GC voices, as shrieking "TERFs" who were "attacking" her for being "pto-trans rights."

She's using every rhetorical trick in the book to paint herself as reasonable, appease the unappeasable, and still demonise the women who have been fearless enough all along to point out the emperor's lack of clothes.

I find it hard to believe this is the same observant snd sharp-minded woman who wrote The Robber Bride and Alias Grace. Although, come to think of it, she has always adored a female villain...

Ereshkigalangcleg · 24/10/2021 10:09

Laura Bates has a huge blind spot on this. I can't believe she can't see the misogyny, she just can't bring herself to acknowledge it.

BraveBananaBadge · 24/10/2021 09:24

Absolutely, trancepants

FindTheTruth · 24/10/2021 09:19

@WarriorN

I don't know much about the laura Bates book - was there any analysis of the GC / trans perspectives?
Laura Bates gave a wishy washy response to GC / trans in this mumsnet webchat www.mumsnet.com/Talk/mumsnet_live_events/4016668-Webchat-with-Laura-Bates-founder-of-the-Everyday-Sexism-Project-and-author-of-Men-Who-Hate-Women-Tuesday-8-September-at-12pm?msgid=99827683#99827683
trancepants · 24/10/2021 09:13

@BraveBananaBadge

It looks as if she's thinking clearly and explaining herself without being defensive but why she's bothering to appease the likes of these people - who see anything that isn't trans centred as wishing them all dead - is a waste of everyone's energy. See also the silly fool whining to her that there's "no safe spaces for trans people in the UK" etc etc Hysterics.
I'm not sure if she gets that the vast, vast, vast majority of 'terfs' are that third side. Women like Germaine Greer, JKR, the lesbian groups who protested Pride in 2018, concerned mothers with long left/liberal histories like so so many of us here, Kathleen Stock, etc. We've been here on this third side, wanting to make things fair and safe for everyone, for years.
BraveBananaBadge · 24/10/2021 09:10

@WarriorN

She's trying very hard to be a centrist in a binary argument.

When it boils down to science, biology and law, you can't appease both sides.

As a life-long fence sitter, I'm sympathetic Grin - but while she's still happy to accept the thinking that people with GC views are evil t---- who literally want trans people not to exist, she's not quite there is she.